Yes, when you called me the "Thread-ologist," you MEANT it as an insult as well....just as those who first called Jesus' followers those "Christians." ---Both of these terms/labels were MEANT to mock.
But, I have laughed at your attempt to belittle me and have claimed the label you gave me....just as the early Christians grew to claim that label.
In the Bible, the "COMFORTER" is the HOLY SPIRIT which will come AFTER JESUS.
Yes, the male pronoun "HE" is used but, clearly, the Bible says it is a SPIRIT, not a MAN.
But, it looks to me like Muslims can't make up their minds just WHO or WHAT is the HOLY SPIRIT nor who/what gave the "REVELATION" to Muhammad and they wanna CLAIM the title of "comforter" for Muhammad by splicin' and dicing the Bible.
So, (according to Muslims), how can GABRIEL be the HOLY SPIRIT and Muhammad be the COMFORTER from the Bible which Jesus said was the HOLY SPIRIT?
As for the rest of this....No, Info, I'm not trying to "assassinate your character." --You don't need any help with that.
However, do remember that my questions about "BILL" came from YOU entering the Christianity Study Forum with your disrespectful comments about the Bible and mocking Christianity, and Destee gave you a warning for it. http://destee.com/index.php?threads/the-woman-with-the-alabaster-box.57744/
Then, I started a separate thread about "BILL." ---But, because you can't support what YOU SAID, here you are telling me I should have done my own research.
So, don't try to act like your hands are so clean here. Yes, YOU have an AGENDA when it comes to the Bible and Christianity here. You will use any opportunity to mock and belittle them, and your track record goes back YEARS on this site.
No, you don't come into the Christianity forum any more; but you will use "any means necessary" to achieve your AGENDA with other threads.....just like this one.
But, according to YOU, I'm the one who has an "agenda" all because I defend my faith from people LIKE YOU who constantly attack it, either OVERTLY or COVERTLY.
YOU prefer the covert attack, the passive-aggressive approach; but it is still an attack, none-the-less. And when you get called on it, you try to act all innocent...and then accuse the other of "over-reacting." -----That's some white folks tactics...They use that all the time too...."You misunderstood me."..."You took my words out of context." etc....
I've told you before how you THINK yourself so good with the art of RHETORIC. ---You think you can MANIPULATE a conversation to your benefit by trying to discount or discredit another.
smh.....
Happy New Year!