Black Spirituality Religion : "Jesus" Is Being ''Crucified'' today for Resisting Christianity.........

[cherryblossom]

- .....- now wouldn't this depend on which one of the thousands of versions one is quoting. ....

....! And in your expeditiousness expose yet another fallacy from your scriptures. If jesus is god, yet says that HE is not WORTHY TO FILL THE SHOES OF HE THAT COMES AFTER HIM and that THE ONE COMING AFTER HIM IS MIGHTIER, well then there's something very wrong with this picture and what you christians have been led to BELIEVE about the 'son of god'!

ROFLOL!

No, Info, it depends on what "VERSION" you are attributing to it.

Yet, AGAIN, the "THOUGHTS FROM YOUR MIND" are so laughable.

Yet, AGAIN, the FALLACY lies in your so-called "TRANSLATION."

THAT BIBLE VERSE IS JOHN THE BAPTIST SPEAKING OF JESUS.
IT IS NOT JESUS SPEAKING OF SOMEONE COMING AFTER HIM.

Now, I see why you're so confused. *smh*

Matthew 3:
[1] In those days came John the Baptist, preaching in the wilderness of Judaea,
[2] And saying, Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.
[3] For this is he that was spoken of by the prophet Esaias, saying, The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight.
[4] And the same John had his raiment of camel's hair, and a leathern girdle about his loins; and his meat was locusts and wild honey.
[5] Then went out to him Jerusalem, and all Judaea, and all the region round about Jordan,
[6] And were baptized of him in Jordan, confessing their sins.
[7] But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?
[8] Bring forth therefore fruits meet for repentance:
[9] And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
[10] And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: therefore every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
[11] I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire:
[12] Whose fan is in his hand, and he will throughly purge his floor, and gather his wheat into the garner; but he will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire.
[13] Then cometh Jesus from Galilee to Jordan unto John, to be baptized of him.

 

[cherryblossom]

....See how you "splice & dice" and mix and split Bible verses together to fit your agenda??

Now, yes, JESUS did speak of the HOLY SPIRIT coming AFTER HIM; but He didn't say nothing bout tying no shoes or filling no shoes.

*I am HOLLERIN'! This is just too ridiculous to believe.*

So, just which "BY-BILL" did you get that from?! lol
YOU NEED TO STOP LISTENING TO "BILL" cuz he aint telling you right!

John.14
[16] And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever;
[26] But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

John.15
[26] But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me:

John.16
[7] Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.

 

[info-moetry]

Exactly what is my agenda again? Because last i checked no one here has ever called me a 'threadologist'. And if they did i sure wouldn't take it as a compliment! Just as the term 'christian' was not meant to be a compliment!

IT IS NOT JESUS SPEAKING OF SOMEONE COMING AFTER HIM.

Now, yes, JESUS did speak of the HOLY SPIRIT coming AFTER HIM;

- well which one is it ms. blossom? He did or he didn't? Yes, in that vs. i quoted it was john speaking of course, but Jesus said basically the same thing, as you agree above! No, the wording is not EXACTLY the same but he basically said the same thing. (i really didn't think i had to explain to this degree) John said he wouldn't be able to fill his shoes and jesus said 'if i go not away HE CAN NOT COME, THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH WHICH MUSLIMS SAY WAS MUHAMMAD (P.B.U.H)!

So while you're busy laughing @ the mind of info. ask yourself why you always seek the mind of info.! Also, ponder on the above vs. said by Jesus because if he was the light and the way, then why the need for THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH TO COME WHICH JESUS SAID WAS A HE!!

you're so busy trying to assassinate my character that you fail to realize that in all of your haste to laugh and pull up old threads to 'get your praise on' you are exposing just how much these conversations truly effect & shake you up and you pull those old threads up to give you strength to even talk to some of us. So i really don't know why you do it to yourself!

I mean geez you are still (a little more than a year later) asking me who BILL is in another thread and trying to moch me? THis means you have not done any research on your own. It's truly sad becaue the information is out there with even the slightest investigation.

Maybe it's you who has the agenda because just like what was done to 'jesus' you seek to crucify my character for resisting chritianity!

 

[MS234]

.I am HOLLERIN'! This is just too ridiculous to believe.*

i agree

Pun and irony included, no coverage charge necessary

 

[cherryblossom]

Exactly what is my agenda again? Because last i checked no one here has ever called me a 'threadologist'. And if they did i sure wouldn't take it as a compliment! Just as the term 'christian' was not meant to be a compliment!

Yes, when you called me the "Thread-ologist," you MEANT it as an insult as well....just as those who first called Jesus' followers those "Christians." ---Both of these terms/labels were MEANT to mock.

But, I have laughed at your attempt to belittle me and have claimed the label you gave me....just as the early Christians grew to claim that label.

- well which one is it ms. blossom? He did or he didn't? Yes, in that vs. i quoted it was john speaking of course, but Jesus said basically the same thing, as you agree above! No, the wording is not EXACTLY the same but he basically said the same thing. (i really didn't think i had to explain to this degree) John said he wouldn't be able to fill his shoes and jesus said 'if i go not away HE CAN NOT COME, THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH WHICH MUSLIMS SAY WAS MUHAMMAD (P.B.U.H)!

So while you're busy laughing @ the mind of info. ask yourself why you always seek the mind of info.! Also, ponder on the above vs. said by Jesus because if he was the light and the way, then why the need for THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH TO COME WHICH JESUS SAID WAS A HE!!

In the Bible, the "COMFORTER" is the HOLY SPIRIT which will come AFTER JESUS.
Yes, the male pronoun "HE" is used but, clearly, the Bible says it is a SPIRIT, not a MAN.

But, it looks to me like Muslims can't make up their minds just WHO or WHAT is the HOLY SPIRIT nor who/what gave the "REVELATION" to Muhammad and they wanna CLAIM the title of "comforter" for Muhammad by splicin' and dicing the Bible.

So, (according to Muslims), how can GABRIEL be the HOLY SPIRIT and Muhammad be the COMFORTER from the Bible which Jesus said was the HOLY SPIRIT?

Surah 2:
97. Say: Whoever is an enemy to Gabriel-for he brings down the (revelation) to thy heart by Allah.s will, a confirmation of what went before, and guidance and glad tidings for those who believe,-

Surah 16:
102. Say, the Holy Spirit has brought the revelation from thy Lord in Truth, in order to strengthen those who believe, and as a Guide and Glad Tidings to Muslims.

you're so busy trying to assassinate my character that you fail to realize that in all of your haste to laugh and pull up old threads to 'get your praise on' you are exposing just how much these conversations truly effect & shake you up and you pull those old threads up to give you strength to even talk to some of us. So i really don't know why you do it to yourself!

I mean geez you are still (a little more than a year later) asking me who BILL is in another thread and trying to moch me? THis means you have not done any research on your own. It's truly sad becaue the information is out there with even the slightest investigation.

Maybe it's you who has the agenda because just like what was done to 'jesus' you seek to crucify my character for resisting chritianity!

As for the rest of this....No, Info, I'm not trying to "assassinate your character." --You don't need any help with that.

However, do remember that my questions about "BILL" came from YOU entering the Christianity Study Forum with your disrespectful comments about the Bible and mocking Christianity, and Destee gave you a warning for it. http://destee.com/index.php?threads/the-woman-with-the-alabaster-box.57744/

Then, I started a separate thread about "BILL." ---But, because you can't support what YOU SAID, here you are telling me I should have done my own research.

So, don't try to act like your hands are so clean here. Yes, YOU have an AGENDA when it comes to the Bible and Christianity here. You will use any opportunity to mock and belittle them, and your track record goes back YEARS on this site.

No, you don't come into the Christianity forum any more; but you will use "any means necessary" to achieve your AGENDA with other threads.....just like this one.

But, according to YOU, I'm the one who has an "agenda" all because I defend my faith from people LIKE YOU who constantly attack it, either OVERTLY or COVERTLY.

YOU prefer the covert attack, the passive-aggressive approach; but it is still an attack, none-the-less. And when you get called on it, you try to act all innocent...and then accuse the other of "over-reacting." -----That's some white folks tactics...They use that all the time too...."You misunderstood me."..."You took my words out of context." etc....

I've told you before how you THINK yourself so good with the art of RHETORIC. ---You think you can MANIPULATE a conversation to your benefit by trying to discount or discredit another.