- Nov 2, 2009
- 8,801
- 5,870
- Occupation
- independent thoughtist thinker, context linker
The only thing either of us have is words on a page. We are both basing our opinion of the situation on words on a page...even that the event happened at all is based on words on a page.
You are "skeptical" that Black on Black crime exist? Open YOUR eyes man...
It is obvious that until I posted information from the rest of the article, most posters, if not all, had just taken the OP and ran to their agenda corner with it...it's obvious that no consideration was given to a comprehensive look at the overall case, just a bunch of agenda driven assumptions.
I look at things from a perspective of wanting to know the truth rather it is favorable or not. In addition to the perspective of the accused and the criminal justice system, I look at things from the victims perspective as well as the victims family. It is blatantly clear that you have looked at this issue from only one persective. You are too caught up in your tunnel visioned perspective to get it.
Then, to further your agenda, rather than focus on the information available to us to present in opinion, you overlook the information all together and defend your agenda with this foolishess about house negros and field negros. A brother can't hold an opinion that differs from yours without being a house negro????
Ok, I get it. So I'm supposed to defend now right. I'm supposed to roll up
my sleeves and defend against the misinformation you're dropping about
what I said.. and then you'll side-step each point I make and drop another
6 pounds of misinformation.. No.. aint got the time. my words are clear
and they stand on their own.
Peace.