Hey, Bro.
I am glad you are back to help out those sisters. I think they need some help. Two women against one poor half-educated little brother. What is taking them so long to get their response together? aybe you can answer that. I hope so, because you did not goo such an outstanding jon answering this:
Like I said...I will not get into a circular argument with you.
What do you call tis non-sense if it is not "circular"?
Notice I did mention that "Islamic scholars" refer to the Queen of Sheba as "Bilqis".
But they blamed it on the Jews.
I know what Sura 34 states. In fact, reading that Sura alone caused me NOT to convert to Islam over 30 years ago.
You took it out on Muslims what Jews did? Now, correct me if I am wrong. But, that seems "circular": and TWISTED to me.
In case you missed my point, again. in terms of the WRITTEN TEXT "SHEBA" existed before it was referenced.
That has NOTHING to do with Quran.
This is to say, the Quran did NOT exist before Sheba/Saba.
Prove it. Brother, you are an intelligent person, or so I thought. So stop the tricknology and admit that you were mistaken. That is the only honest ting to do. Honesty lends to credibility.
You can play games if you will but this is where while the Quran may not explicitly NAME Queen Makeda by her true name it does make several inferences.
Do you know the difference between literal and inferential?
As far as I know, the insanity pertaning to "literal and inferential" has no place in Islamic Scholarship. Any such scholar who to us with such nonsense would get run out of town.