I agree 100% and thank you for being part of this conversation.
I think you also provided some backup of another point I was making about the overestimation about what science can do. Frankster is very smart so I think is looking more at the theory than application side.
Sorry for barging in.....had a little extra time
Yes, IN THEORY, a lot of things are possible, as I said before. But are they practical? Is there an application? Can we pay the cost?
It is already being done is my theory...
The fact that I cannot find explicit proof is because its secret/proprietary....But without a doubt I have produce enough proof to move it from the theoretical to the practical and even to the rudimentary as in early/beginning phases/stages.
Cost is relative to the technology being used...that we do not know.
According to Google: 100,000-watt FM stations can regularly be heard up to 100 miles (160 km) away, and farther (e.g., 150 miles, 240 km) if there are no competing signals.
We're talking about 100,000 watts just to power an FM radio wave that does no damage to the material receiving it, much less collateral damage to building materials.
Yes....but it not focused or concentrated.
I remember when solar powered electricity was sci-fi now its mundane and easily explained as science....
Focus the rays of the sun and you can burn down a house....come on
Focus Radio Waves and you cook your meals....you guys are smarter than this - the media propaganda is doing a job on you both
My apologies for sounding flippant...in a rush - always comes off that way - sorry.
China (for example) is 4,350 mi from Alaska which is not heavily guarded airspace and did we not recently have Chinese aerial drones in the US that could have easily dealt with HAARP?? (just sayin')
I'm not a math guy, by any stretch, but if 100,000 watts can only reach a 100 miles then that's a multiplier of 1,000. Right? So to hit china with even "Smooth R&B" lol we would need 4.3 Megawatts.
We do not know what China was doing with those balloons....
Waiting for whistle blower types or so called conspiracy theorist to check out their theories or explanations as to reason and purpose.
According to HAARP: The facility uses 30 transmitter shelters, each with six pairs of 10 kilowatt transmitters, to achieve the 3.6 MW transmit power.
Now you drinking the Cool aid of media and military industrial complex.
This is less than the amount of power that it would normally take to hit China with "music" but let's say that there is more of a beam-forming effect that directs and concentrates the signal. I can accept that a signal could reach China (and this would support military uses for long-distance communications). But a signal that is also powerful enough to cause cataclysmic events??
Directed Energy Weapons
Like I said... we put bomb shelters underground. So how much power would it take to even reach a tectonic plate without drilling and cause a vibration strong enough to cause an earth quake?
Even if I accept that there is some kind of harmonic frequency native to the rocks that tectonics plates are made of, and setting up some kind of resonance would have a more powerful effect, there is still the power it would take to reach it and the steady signal strength needed to permeate it with a signal. I just don't see how that's possible under current technology and power consumption.
To create these pulses, they used an exotic machine called a
magnetohydrodynamic generator, originally developed by the Soviet military as an energy source for advanced weaponry. The machine is powered by rocket engines that blast exhaust gases between the poles of an extremely powerful magnet. Just as moving a wire through a magnetic field creates a pulse of current, this jet of charged gas creates an intense but short-lived electric field.
By sticking two electrodes four metres into the ground a few kilometres apart, the geologists directed the electromagnetic pulses-effectively a blast of artificial lightning-into the Earth. Throughout the years of trials the mountains rumbled with weak tremors, but no one thought that unusual in an area prone to quakes.
That changed in 1993, when Nikolay Tarasov, a seismologist at the Institute of Earth Physics in Moscow, began a study to pin down how nuclear explosions influence earthquakes. He had developed a statistical method to determine whether seismic activity in a given area had gone up or down after a blast. To get some background data he turned to seismic records from his colleagues in central Asia. Much to his surprise, Tarasov realised that the seismic activity following these electromagnetic pulses was no fluke.
In fact, the results were staggering. The electromagnetic pulses were brief-lasting 10 seconds at most-and the total energy input was a modest 10 million joules, about the power of a single flash of lightning. But the total seismic energy released afterwards was up to a million times greater than the energy they had put in.
Geologists seem to be no closer in trying to predict earthquakes. But how about stopping them in the first place? Seismologists are looking at inducing quakes to release some of the pent-up energy and prevent some of the deadliest earthquakes.
www.eurekalert.org
Remember there is always more than One way to skin a cat.....meaning this is how the Russians are doing - Americans are using a different method.
We are still using power grids with wires on poles!
That's by design.
