i think we could use a giggle
four score ..........................................80
buck nine ........................................ 1.09
(times) 2 ..............(81.09*2) ...............or ............... (1.89*2)
divided by 1...........162.18 .................or .................. 3.78
plus 3 ............(165.18 or 162.21).......or.............(6.78 or 3.81)
minus 8..........(157.18 or 162.10).......or............(-2.78 or 3.73)
well! "four score and a buck nine" - wasn't sure about decimal point placement although it looks as if the 81.09 would be more correct, even though 1.89 seems to "work out better".
"divided by 1" ? or could that have been "divided by (1 plus 3=4)"? that would given us (162.18 divided by 4) or (3.78 divided by 4), and then subtract 8.
("divided by (1 plus 3 minus 8=-4)" would have resulted in, effectively, multiplying by 4 ... which could be considered "workable" if we go with the "1.89" branch - approx. 15 ... or not ...)
but, like the man said, the Real answer is "Ageless Spirituality".
Class Dismissed
Last time i check she was four scores and a buck nine x 2 divided by 1
plus 3 minus 8 .........yep dats how old .........and the best part is she
one sweet lovin and kind soul from an era of caring hope dat helps !!!!!lol Brother $$RICH$$ ... wait ... i need your fingers, mine, and a calculator ... to do all that cipher'n !!!
You're so sweet ... thanks for the love!
Destee
four score ..........................................80
buck nine ........................................ 1.09
(times) 2 ..............(81.09*2) ...............or ............... (1.89*2)
divided by 1...........162.18 .................or .................. 3.78
plus 3 ............(165.18 or 162.21).......or.............(6.78 or 3.81)
minus 8..........(157.18 or 162.10).......or............(-2.78 or 3.73)
well! "four score and a buck nine" - wasn't sure about decimal point placement although it looks as if the 81.09 would be more correct, even though 1.89 seems to "work out better".
"divided by 1" ? or could that have been "divided by (1 plus 3=4)"? that would given us (162.18 divided by 4) or (3.78 divided by 4), and then subtract 8.
("divided by (1 plus 3 minus 8=-4)" would have resulted in, effectively, multiplying by 4 ... which could be considered "workable" if we go with the "1.89" branch - approx. 15 ... or not ...)
but, like the man said, the Real answer is "Ageless Spirituality".
Class Dismissed