- May 7, 2009
- 6,379
- 2,947
Then, which name would you accept or use, if you had to?
...
That is a good question.
The Bible today, refers to Israel being captive in Egypt and then uses other names for other parts such as Simon from Cyrene and etc. But the broadest term in the ancient scriptures translated today would be 'the land of Ham'.
In the American Protestant Movement, they refer to the continent as 'Africa' so, this is what I would use, however, I absolutely understand and agree to the term KEMET. But the term ALKEBULAN is not recognized, to my knowledge, even in African governments anywhere. So, while I agree with your research based on Dr. Ben and Dr. Nana from Ghana, I feel that this term needs to be acknowledge by Black AFrican government first. And because of the Arabic nature of its transliteration, I don't think that it will ever be widely accepted by Black AFrican leaders though. I believe they would accept the root terms though such as 'Kebu-lan' but not 'Al-kebulan', imo.