Hey Perfection!
These are not words becoming of someone who loves Black Women. You are doing nothing more than approving the actions of hate against Black Women.
It's no mystery to me that there's hate amongst our people, or that our people are well-hated. It's not so much an approval I'm expressing, but an understanding.
If you really want to see a hatred for women, study Europeans. As it were, we are largely imitative of Europeans. Ergo, our hatred is verily explained. I'm not 'approving' of it. I'm only putting the comments into context. I hope that clears up that concern.
Maybe you're not aware of what you are doing but you are basically saying that when it comes to 'whores' then there are some among us. But even before that you, and they, assume there is such a Black Woman who exists. That being the case, as I stated earlier, you agree with those two persons who say they love Black Women.
This may well be a language difference, but I suppose that a "prostitute" is a "whore." Not that I'd use that word.
Furthermore, it is not an intelligent response for you to say:
Everyone has their language traits. Obviously, there's a method to their madness.
So in other words, we should just be patient as these persons show their love for Black Women with hate towards Black Women. Does this make sense to you?
I was addressing MsInterpret's comment toward the two's singledom. I'm not saying what we should do. I'm simply saying that people can have any number of language traits and still find suitors. I mean, you do realize that there are many women amongst the Hebrew Israelites?
Finally, you argue on their behalf that they "are standing against sexual immorality as best they know how." Here, again, you are being an apologist for persons who hate Black Women. You are now assuming that our community is plague with 'sexual immorality' and the alleged related "black people have the highest rates of aids." I bet you believe that don't you? I had already decimated (in another room) one of those persons arguments about his Black Women abortion "statistics."
I'm trying to say what's unspoken as to their narratives. It's not that I'm in accordance. Though, actually, I borrowed the term "Sexual Immorality" from Du Bois's work in the 1913's. It's not really about what I believe, but just clearing the ear concerning the comments we're reading.
Though, I absolutely disagree with calling the women on this forum "whores." I thought I made it clear.
You see what we are dealing with here is simple. You got some black men---not all---but some who just don't like Black Women. They just don't. And the reasons are usually because Black Women are making them own up to their responsibility to their children, or, these black men are so issue-laden that certain Black Women are not giving them attention so now they, these few black men, become irate and these guys then seek to hurt Black Women by any method they can.
That can be some of it. It's debateable but my point wasn't to make judgments on the disputants.
So it's basically like they're saying "Imma show you 'whore' not to like me." But you gotta understand the person, thru their words (written or spoken) to be able to catch this because it could run right pass you because they will be using what appears to be a legitimate concern with Black Women. "I call yall whores and b-chz because I love you."
Again, it's debateable but my point wasn't to make judgments on the disputants.
What's my point? My point is that it's not about who a Queen is sleeping with. Or, we should say, how many men she may be sleeping with. You don't believe me? Think about this and I will prove it to you. How many of those type of persons, who use the Bible as their blunt object, only call Black Women 'whores' who sleep with multiple men? That's not true is it? They will call a nun a whore if she doesn't follow their dictates. This means that thier b-words and their whore words may be used against any Black Woman for any reasons at any time.
Brother, a person who researches the Hebrew Israelites will find that they are Polygamist due a following of the Old Testament. That should inform a reader as to the sexual bias in the claim of "whoredom." But this isn't a discussion on the disputants. What's more, a Polygamist people have many women followers . . ..
I was only addressing MsInterpret's claim toward the singledom of the conversants. Expressing that technically some women like their conversation.
reserve the right to call any of yall whores no matter if you sleep with 1 man, 5 men or none at all. What you don't understand is that it is their job to make you feel crummy about yourselves despite what you do.
Like I said, I'm not really discussing the disputants. They wrote what they had for a reason. I'm only showing that they are reasonable, not that they are agreeable. For instance, some Hebrew Israelites wouldn't object to a man with multiple women. But their reasoning is based on their doctrines.
Therefore, this is how you can tell that these are the kinds of males who have personal issues with themselves. They are lonely, crying behind these computer screens, filled with rage because they want beautiful women like Ms Interpret to like them. Yall are getting thrown off with them scriptures, phony statistics and seemingly legitimate social ills they are placing before you as the justification for calling our lovely Queens 'whores.'
Well, everyone knows that the women on this forum are beautiful. But I'm not psychoanalyzing posts.
![[How to] Teach Your Kids about Personal Finance](/data/xfmg/thumbnail/4/4010-b538f95d1cfbe8786075cc8911f3a877.jpg?1561827274)
