In court or in journalism
All is related until it isn't. There is no
"Well...there was a little strong arm robbery earlier in the day...but no need to mention that"
You seek out all information and then use what you use.
I myself dont find it to be particularly important to the case...but it did happen and you do put it on the table for consideration and completeness.
Enki what is more important to the case?
Saying multiple sources asked for evidence when in fact only one did.
Or leaving out the fact that Mike Brown may have assaulted the officer?
Its seems you may think releasing the video is worse then the content of the video itself.
If I was someone trying to support Mike Brown I wouldnt even bring up the video.
Bringing it up to show the cop as a snitch while showing brown as a thief and guilty of assault seems pretty laughable. If releasing the video paints yt as dirty what does it say about brown? All the while continusely not addressing the fact that the eye witnesses may have miss held key facts about the case during statements to police.
C'mon..lets be real here.
.