- May 31, 2004
- 3,809
- 102
nibs said:(Music Producer) - Tuthmosis I married princes Ahmose who was daughter of Ahmose I. At this point the royal bloodline from the Hyksos war is sustained through princes Ahmose. Tuthmosis I had two elder sons that died before him.
there is both a matrilineal and a patrilineal bloodline. this is why brother's would "marry sisters" and fathers would "marry" their daughters. both bloodlines needed to be rule. tuthmose i was not a crown prince or a prince at all. tuthmose i was a general. the patrilineal bloodline ended with amenhotep i. only the matrilineal bloodline propagated after that.
(Music Producer) - Tuthmosis III married Hatshepsut-Merytre who is to become mother of Amenhotep II.
<snip>
Amenhotep II becomes that Immaculate Birth or full-blooded royal bloodline.
immaculate = clean.
my interpretation is that the "god's wife" title and role reflected the fact that the patrilineal bloodline had ended, and suggests that the true father is the great god imin, through ritual possession of the queen's husband. not tuthmose iii, as tuthmose iii also did not have the patrilineal bloodline.
(Music Producer) - As I said, Akhenaten’s bloodline can be traced all the way back to the Hyksos war.
not his patrilineal bloodline.
(Music Producer) - It is indeed a mess because we use to marry our half sisters and even in some cases our daughters but we did these things to intentionally sustain royal blood.
these things were done because aishat (isis) is the seat of power. the matrilineal bloodline is the true owner/controller of the land, and the king is the executor. if the queen, the king must take that crown princess as his wife as she is the true seat of power. similarly, a crown prince must marry the next princess in succession, (sister/half-sister) and the queen becomes queen mother.
there is both a patrilineal and matrilineal bloodline.
Nibs:
(Music Producer) - As I said, Akhenaten’s bloodline can be traced all the way back to the Hyksos war.
-----------
not his patrilineal bloodline.
This continues to not refute the fact that Akhenaten only existed and was born because of his great, great, great, great, grandfather or mother. That person’s blood is responsible for the life of Akhenaten. That person was of the Royal Bloodline that was responsible for expelling the Hyksos.
You are trying to introduce a maternal and paternal conditioning in an attempt to prove what?
You asked me to show how Akhenaten was traceable back to the Pharaoh that expelled the Hyksos. Now that I have shown you, you have injected this maternal / paternal thing.
What you need to examine is rather or not your maternal / paternal restrictions had anything to do with governing the Egyptian election of Pharaoh.
Due to the historical reality that Akhenaten is indeed recorded as Pharaoh of Egypt and also his son is recorded as such, it becomes evident that your personal restrictions that you are trying to create today did not have an impact, effect nor place in the minds of our Egyptian ancestors when it came to who would be named Pharaoh of Egypt.
Any parent being of Royal blood automatically made the son or daughter of Royal Blood, period.