SAMURAI36 said:I have to disagree. If they can track a child's motor functions while in the womb, I don't see why any other information cannot be catalogued.
I've noticed that for many our people, ignorance continues to be its own excuse. We are perpetually content to BELIEVE anything, while never attempting to KNOW anything.
I KNOW for a fact that most children are going to pursue a mate, based on the qualities exhibited by the dominant members of the opposite sex within their family. I KNOW this, because this has been my experience.
This is both impirical, as well as anecdotal.
Further, to talk about what is "little known", is tantamount to selling yourself and our people short; just because something is little known, does not mean that the capability to know it is not present, nor will it ever be.
PEACE
I'm detecting frustration in this post. I'm not a researcher, but I do know that many times scientists and other researchers can find the results they're looking for due to bias. Therefore, I don't tend to accept everything I read that researchers have discovered immediately.
Infant development is not my field. Therefore I can choose to accept or question, what the researchers in this field discover. Many times, findings in this area and others are later refuted by further research.
I never said that anything is beyond our peoples' reach or that we lack the capability. You do realize that's coming from you.