- Dec 27, 2013
- 502
- 31
I don't understand either of these statements.As I said earlier, you're right about 'integration' because the slave master had no problems integrating with the black slave girls and women and as far as today, well, this government is about 400+ years old, and time will tell, but it's too soon to believe statistics right now.
On your first point: How am I "right about integration because the slave master had no problems integrating with the black slave girls and women"? What does the slave masters of the past have to do with the white male/black female relationships of today? The former were established without the black female's consent while the latter are voluntary, based on mutual consent.
On your second point: What does the government being 400+ years old have to do with white male/black female relationships, especially those portrayed in the motion pictures? I don't see any way the government is forcing or influencing people's choice of a romantic partner.
On your third point: You wrote "it's too soon to believe statistics right now." I don't understand this. Why is it too soon?
My positionn is that integration is a natural product of a free society. This reality is reflected in American culture (i.e. television programs, video games, feature films, music videos, TV commercials, print ads, etc.). I also believe because interracial relationships are more accepted today--especially by younger people, who are coveted among advertisers--we see these relationships more often in the media I mentioned earlier. I just don't see any nefarious scheme or plot against our people. Of course, some of us do love our conspiracy theories...