- Feb 2, 2006
- 578
- 179
Thank you, why are compliments so few and far between on cyberspace message boards but why have you shifted the context away from the manner in which even our alleged intelligentsia [Jessie Jackson did attempt to get BLACK binned too] continue to utilise the colour Black to describe the diversely mixed people of African ethnicity and ALL of their organizations/ initiatives in every area of human activity?
I don't know why Jesse 'n' dem do what they do with regards to their use of the word "Black." Can't say I care either.
NoSami, aren’t my first five questions challenging the manner in which within the current socio-exonomic paradigm/construct we’re still allowing the White Supremacist Racist status quo to define us as Coloureds, Negros, Blacks as opposed to totally ignoring/ maraginalizing them by consciously embracing our African ethnicity?
I understand where you're coming from, but I am trying to reach a certain audience - people of Afrikan descent who refer to themselves as "black". That being the case, I choose to meet them where they are by using terms they identify themselves by. Otherwise, my message gets dismissed BY them as not being applicable TO them. What words the kkkracka establishment chooses to use can best be nullified by us establishing our own lean, mean PR machine that controls the language in a way most beneficial to us. But that really takes us beyond the scope of this particular thread which is the pedophile wing of the white homosexual mafia's attempt to legalize sex with children.
Wouldn't anyone of African ethnicity who is genuinely that CLUELESS be of marginal utility to US anyway, and if the NEGROBOT zone is so all pervasive/significant in our communites in the USA, why has African ALWAYS beaten Coloured, Negro Black in all the censuses with regard to what label we should utilize?
The only census I have personally seen is that in the USA, and I don't recall seeing "African" as a category. But that really takes us beyond the scope of this particular thread which is the pedophile wing of the white homosexual mafia's attempt to legalize sex with children.
Maybe, maybe not, couldn’t their initiative be an integral part of their ongoing focus on population control, fear of the continual population growth of the non-white masses in general, the African masses specifically while the European masses worldwide are in decline; in that wouldn’t we be in great shape if homosexual relations between consenting adults was the worst thing happening in our communities in the USA and worldwide?
It is their fear of continual population growth of the nonwhite masses which would necessarily lead to their own extinction that propels their drive to homosexualize other races of people among the other dirt they've been doing to people of color around the world the past 500 years. They are in fact in negative population growth and they know it.
EXACTLY, like you I am genuinely very impressed by the manner in which Gay Rights is so constantly No.1 in the current POWER ELITE’s agenda [[as underlined by some country’s being economically sanctioned by the USA for somewhat bizarrely attempting to make homosexuality illegal as if anyone could really control what people do in the privacy of their homes], in that wouldn’t things improve rapidly for African Americans in the USA/Brazil and other parts of the Diaspora if our lobby was even 50% as efficient as their’s, in that wouldn’t this planet be in great shape if homosexual relations between consenting adults was the worst thing happening on it, in the 21st century?
If we even HAD a lobby that would be a great start.