I can not even begin to point out the numerous factual and scientific errors in theis thread. This thread makes me think that everyone today is a retard. For some background info I work as a contractor and graduated with a degree in CM in 2005 and Civil Engineering in 2009. The WTC collaspe is a textbook example of strenght of materals and is widley accepted by the engineering, architecture, construction, and scientific communities. Trust us we are experts.
1st off the WTC towers,
1. Building fall straight down due to gravity, what did you expect it to do fall up or something?
2. If the WTC Demolitions were controlled demos like you retards say then the would have collasped from the bottom, you know like every controlled demolition in history has happened? It is impossible to control demo a building like the way the WTC, far to many factors, learn some basic physics before spouting out your garbage.
3. Not sure if it was brought up in the garbage called this thread but admitily jetfuel burn at a high enough temp to melt steel, however steel losses 50% of its strenght at around 900 degrees F and jet fuel burns around 1100 degrees F.
4. Due to the ******** coming out of your mouths I am assuming you do not have any higher education and either did not graduate HS or did not learn anything in HS, however if you had you would have learned Force = Mass(acceleration), when the steel supports in WTC heat up and lose strenght eventually that section collaspes, the force of the top section of the building multiplied by the acceleration of gravity falls on the rest of the structure causing it to collaspe under the intense force. Since this is a Mamhattan sky scraper it was orignally designed to support mostly wind forces and wind sheer rather than a large roof load.
2nd the Pentagon
1. There are several pictures of airplane wreckage at the crash site, a 17 year old kid from Canada made up the story of no airplane wreckage as a joke and a few retards took it serously.
2. The CCTV camera of the pentagon clearly shows a large airplane sized object hitting the pentagon, this footage is plublished and widley avaiable.
3. When a airplane crashes into a solid object it dosent make a cartoon impact thats exactly the size of the object.
4. It would make sense the headquarters of the military built during war time just might heavly fortified, hence why the airplane made a smaller impact holes.
5. Why would the military attack the headquarters of itself when there are thousands of other targets?
others
1. Aluminum melts at a relativly low temperature hence why an aircraft or airframe melts but a burning cars frame and body will be left.
2. Isreal was founded on May 14, 1948 not September 11, 1948 as stated.
3. Mossad warned the United states in August 2001 about an iminte attack in the United States but due to inaccuracys in Mossads previous inteligence it was disreguarded.
4. The United States and its allies never took a barrel of oil from Iraq or Afghanistan, in fact the US military protected the oil terminals from attack in the hopes the new Iraq gov could resume oil operations to improves its post-war economy.
5. The Taliban did not plan or carry out the attacks, that was Al Queda
6. September 11, 2001 in not the new millenium, the Roman calender that the world follows started January 1st.
7. Iraq and the Taliban never "Gave the US a run for its money" in every engagment between the US military and the opp forces the US obliterated the resitance.
8. Prior to 9/11 plane hijackers had never used airplanes as improvised missles, they had only ransomed the passangers. The crews of the aircraft and NORAD had no reason to suspect this wasnt a simple ransom hijacking that had happened serveral times before(In the US a couple times to).
9. The WTC was the first time a steel framed skyscraper had collasped, however the technology for steel framed building had only been around since the end of WWII, and had only been built in wealthy stable countries, and a skyscraper had never been hit with an airplane of that size or burned with that intensity so it kinda makes sense.
Hope you enjoyed truth, reason, logic, and physics debunking your stupid half assed retarded theroies.
Would you care to back up any of your claims with PROOF as i and others have? Or did you just join this site to bump this thread up after over a month with your first and only post, then just run off and go back to ghosting to check our responses to you?
Everything you have stated has not only already been proven wrong in this thread and is backed up by the fact that you call some of us 'retarded'!
