plus she apparently has me on ignore so how did she know what my response was?..lol.[/I]
I do not have you on 'ignore' anymore. You were subverting that when you kept putting my name in your posts and making inane accusations and comments, so I took you off 'ignore' so I can pay more attention what you write and be able to post your comments here when I had a problem. I took you off 'ignore' when I made this thread and did not put you back on. That's one about how I was about to see and quote comments for this thread. The other way is when people quoted you.
I was hoping we would be able to come to the same tacit agreement that Workinprocess and I have. I made a thread here, addressed my problem with her using Destee or the mods as a mediator (NOT babysitter ), put her on 'ignore', and I haven't had a problem since. I do see her get quoted but it's always about the subject at hand and no cheap shots or accusations towards me or about me. I do not respond to her posts or threads, I do not post in any threads she initiates, I don't insinuate or imply anything about her or to her.... and she does the same for me and to me. Occasionally she may reply to a thread I initiated, but it's to what someone else said and not to me personally. I don't mind that, I just don't respond to her either way.
But that tactic is not working for you and I.
Your comment above shows that you are still trying to be subversive. As long as I don't 'see' you post anything, then I won't be able to post it here and you won't get reprimanded. That's very transparent; but I'm not that naive.
I'm going to sit back.... and watch you tighten your own rope.
(I hate that analogy, but what the hell).
Toodles my dear sista. I Love ya