- Jul 3, 2003
- 445
- 4
Not to belittle what has been said before. Now the state of Illinois and the City of Chicago can be corrupt places as far as the law is concerned. Now what happened with 'innocent until proven guilty?' Now R could have been the guy in the video, but IF the state of Illinois and the city of Chicago are dragging there feet and the videotape is 'slam dunk' against Kelly even if the 'victim' is reluctant to come forward (can easily solve that by giving immunity and declaring her a hostile witness and threatening the parents with aiding and abetting) then let the feds take over-they DO have child porn and prostitution laws(if the girl actually kept the money as alleged that Kelly gave her in the video) to prosecute. Enough time has passed that an indictment should have ALREADY come down. Those who are buying his music are doing so with the thought of 'innocent until proven guilty'. If YOU are accused of something vile-you'd want the same presumption until a trial is held and completed.