Black People Politics : Obama Seeks to Expand US Arms Exports

Discussion in 'Black People Politics' started by Mad Skillz, Jul 31, 2010.

  1. Mad Skillz

    Mad Skillz Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2004
    Messages:
    604
    Likes Received:
    251
    Occupation:
    Real Estate
    Location:
    So. Cal by way of L.I., New York
    Ratings:
    +251
    "Change We Can Believe In" :toast:


    I wonder how much arms will be shipped to third word countries that are trying to pull themselves out of civil wars and post colonial rule. Working behind the scenes, Amerikkka has conducted destabilization campaigns aimed at toppling governments in Africa, South America, and others. This is the message to those who resist U.S. and western imperialism: "If you don't obey, the U.S. will impose sanctions, send arms shipments to rival factions to overthrow your government, install a client regime, and support death squads to crush any resistance." Now that Obama is president this is acceptable, right? And you will support your president and continue to make baseless excuses in spite of Obama continuing the tradition of Amerikkka being the largest purveyor of arms exports and violence to third worlds nations.

    Keep your eyes closed, your mouths silenced, and remain in your slumber to make Obama look "presidential". :sick:

    ----------------------------------

    WASHINGTON - The United States is currently the world biggest weapons supplier - holding 30 per cent of the market - but the Obama administration has begun modifying export control regulations in hopes of enlarging the U.S. market share, according to U.S. officials.

    We Arm the World
    President Barack Obama already has taken the first steps by tucking new language into the Iran sanctions bill signed in early July. His aides are now compiling the "munitions list," which regulates the sale of military items.

    The administration's stated reason for the changes is to simplify the sale of weapons to U.S. allies, but potential spinoffs include generating business for the U.S. defense industry, creating jobs and contributing to Obama's drive to double U.S. exports by 2015.

    Critics say the reforms are being rushed and warn that the expedited procedures could allow weapons technology to fall into the wrong hands.

    India, which currently is seeking 126 fighter-jets worth over $10 billion, 10 large transport aircraft worth $6 billion, and other multi-billion dollar defense sales, could be among the possible beneficiaries. Allies seeking advanced U.S. weaponry and equipment, who now often buy elsewhere due to the cumbersome U.S. approval process, would draw immediate benefit from the reforms, U.S. officials said.

    Obama first called for the reforms in August 2009, then referred to them in his Jan. 27 State of the Union address as an element toward doubling exports by 2015.

    In the House of Representatives, Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Howard Berman, (D-Calif.), is drafting a bill that parallels the president's plan.

    However, it isn't clear that the Senate will go along, as it is still reviewing the president's proposals.

    "It is probably going to be some time yet before there is movement in the relevant committees on formal hearings or writing or legislation," said Andy Fisher, spokesperson for the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.

    Obama's plan, according to top officials, is to ask Congress to streamline the bureaucratic process for approving arms sales by setting up a single new agency to oversee one list of exportable weapons, "tiered" according to the sensitivity of the technology. Currently the State and Commerce Departments maintain separate lists, and the State Department list contains many restrictions.

    "Our aim is to make the system more transparent, efficient, and effective," said Ben Chang, a White House spokesman. "This means we are improving our ability to administer our controls, which improves our ability to enforce them, and equally important, improves the ability of companies to comply."

    Critics say decontrolling weapons systems could fuel regional arms races, allow technology to fall into the wrong hands and, because arms purchasers often want to set up their own industries, end up exporting jobs abroad.

    "The concern that we have is that the net result of this process would be to open the floodgates for military sales to states that do not meet the standards established in years previous," said Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association.

    "We're No. 1 in weapons in the world, so I don't understand what the problem is we need to fix," said a Republican staffer for the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, who asked to remain anonymous due to the sensitivity of the topic.

    Defense Secretary Robert Gates, the most outspoken administration advocate for the new system, said it will "build high walls around a smaller yard" by narrowing in on the nation's "crown jewels."

    However, critics point out that what those crown jewels are depends on decisions yet to be made.

    "There's nothing in their top tier currently," the Senate GOP staffer said. "They can't figure out what should be in their top tier."

    Senior officials have said possible "top tier" items include certain night vision technology and advanced stealth technology, which makes aircraft invisible to radar, infrared, and sonar.

    The new system would allow older technology such as Lockheed Martin's F-16 fighter to fall to a lower tier as newer, more advanced technology emerges. The staffer said that some versions of the plan currently circulating don't include the F-16 in the top tier of the secured list.

    The F-16 may no longer be top technology for the U.S., but as is the case with much of the aging technology that will be decontrolled, the Senate GOP staffer said, "It's often a question of what China, a terrorist, or even a rogue state would do with these things."

    Members of the Obama administration say that changes will enhance national security.

    "In fact, our system itself poses a potential national security risk based on the fact that its structure is overly complicated, contains too many redundancies, and tries to protect too much," United States National Security Advisor General James Jones said in a speech introducing the plans.

    The administration hopes that by streamlining the process, allies will be able to receive more weapons and technology faster, making their equipment more compatible with that of the United States, and making it easier to complete joint operations.

    "It spells the difference between U.S. forces going it alone or having allies who are able to operate in the lethal battle space with U.S. military forces," said former Bush administration arms regulator Amb. Lincoln Bloomfield Jr.

    Rep. Donald Manzullo, R-Ill., represents a district with aerospace and other manufacturers, and said reform is needed for the survival of U.S. manufacturing.

    "We can begin to manufacture our way out of this recession by reforming our export controls," Manzullo said in a speech at the American Enterprises Institute, a conservative think tank.

    Manzullo has worked for export control reform throughout his career and says that the job creation benefits make the initiative worthwhile, but he retains doubts about the current review.

    "I have a problem with giving all that power to one agency," Manzullo said.

    Manzullo explained that having one agency to govern export controls could be dangerous if the wrong person were put in charge.

    Similarly, Christopher Wall, former assistant secretary of commerce, said he supports reform but thought initially that the changes were being rushed. In recent weeks, he said, the administration appears to have a better understanding of the immensity of the task.

    "Whether it has to do with the possible departure of Secretary Gates or the election timetable coming up, neither of these should drive the reform process," Wall said.

    The Senate GOP staffer said that if the United States decontrols as the number one seller in the market, then others with less scrupulous records will follow suit.

    The Obama administration isn't the first executive to see the benefits of export control reform; both former President Bill Clinton and George W. Bush undertook similar reviews, which according to Gregory Suchan, a former deputy assistant secretary of state, "crashed and burned essentially because of opposition from Congress."

    "Anybody who thinks that they can come to a conclusion as to whether this is a good thing or a bad thing," Suchan said, "such a judgment is premature"


    http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/07/29-7
     
  2. $$RICH$$

    $$RICH$$ Lyon King Admin. STAFF

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2001
    Messages:
    69,983
    Likes Received:
    3,977
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    BUSINESS owner
    Location:
    Da~WINDY*CITY //CHICAGO
    Ratings:
    +4,177
    I feel and hear every lick you saying here .
     
  3. Ankhur

    Ankhur Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2009
    Messages:
    14,710
    Likes Received:
    3,006
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    owner of various real estate concerns
    Location:
    Brooklyn
    Ratings:
    +3,014
    when military, takes precedent over any other activity or expenditure, in a nation with no declared war, that system ofv government usually has a certain name
     
  4. HyperKill

    HyperKill Banned MEMBER

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2009
    Messages:
    837
    Likes Received:
    319
    Ratings:
    +319
    good thread. Way too many are givin ya boy a free pass. This idiot is worse than bush in some ways. More dead in Afghanastan than b4 he came in and more weapons to 3rd world countries mired in desperation. But i will admit, it was a smart move by the american ruling class to hit him up for the presidential job. Very little criticism from the brownies. Check out confessions of an econimic hitman at www.linktv.com
     
  5. info-moetry

    info-moetry STAFF STAFF

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,724
    Likes Received:
    6,428
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    A+ technician
    Location:
    The rotten Apple
    Ratings:
    +6,486
    peace

    About 4 or 5 years ago a military friend of mine entrusted me with the tapes of "Confessions of an Economic hitman".I played them in my car the same night he gave it to me and and it blew me away, but at the same time confirmed my thoughts and things i had already heard and read about. Just in much more detail by an actual economic hitman.....
     
  6. wetac0s

    wetac0s Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2009
    Messages:
    395
    Likes Received:
    272
    Ratings:
    +272
    Totally agree with what the OP is saying. Obama is nothing more than a puppet - just like every other president. They are using his image as an excuse to exploit and divide other countries because now they can say, "Hey, we got a Black president! That means we can bully other countries without the whiplash!"

    Obama's image and cultural background make it easy for the US to go forth with their global domination schemes.
     
  7. info-moetry

    info-moetry STAFF STAFF

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,724
    Likes Received:
    6,428
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    A+ technician
    Location:
    The rotten Apple
    Ratings:
    +6,486
    peace

    I agree and have been saying for the longest, also asking the question that never get's answered.

    What president and family do you know to ever wear all BLACK AND RED to their innaugaration?? RED and BLACK represents the C__________ of _________N!

    Michelle's dress even had particular pattern on it.....

    Some people look at this as bashing and what not, but I did not dress them, nor do i and others who (c) alike ask them to throw up their gang sign!

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    The Black Widow - spider

    - you can take it or leave it alone -
     
  8. HyperKill

    HyperKill Banned MEMBER

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2009
    Messages:
    837
    Likes Received:
    319
    Ratings:
    +319
    i usually get the info they wont show from link tv on direct and dish netwrk. As far as true investigative journalism and fair handed news, no of the corporate controlled medias even come close. www.democracynow.org there is also a site called rebelreporters dot org or com. These are the only outlets for true news that isnt controled by the Penatagon and Wallstreet
     
Loading...