- Sep 12, 2009
- 6,840
- 3,594
And how many politicians you (dis)agree with? How many said something that left you like, 'sayyy'wuuuut?' It is interesting to me that celebs are told to 'stay in their lanes' whenBeing a politician takes lots of practice and smooth talking, bringing back an initial comment of trying to give a "P.C." response... "black folks" cringe, "white folks" grin. His delivery was not well received, correct?
Thus... "maybe he should stick to something he does best, or get more practice at speaking politically within the era of his new notariaty", which was not saying he shouldn't speak publicly on critical issues.
they say something worthy of criticism. But when they say something 'we' can agree with, we are like 'right on' (e.g. bill cosby).
That is true, yet in that same channel we find personal opinions that are accepted. Why do you think espn continues to run to stephen a. smith all the time on matters dealing with race (black folk). Why is fox a media juggernaut? Don't underestimate repetition.Everything influences how many weak minded individuals think, even some of the strong minded individuals have weak moments and can be victim of influential words and thoughts. An opinion can be personal without it having to be universally accepted.
I do not see the relevancy in the above. "New nation"? "Assimilation"? ...Huh?Do we really debate these real questions, are we left hanging in the balance, not sure whether creating a new nation or assimilation is a personal or collective need?
...Reads like a question you may wanna put to that "some"(one) else.Martin and Malcolm were presented with these same questions... even though some want to suggest "it was a different time"... does this then make it a different discussion?
It doesn't matter. You brought it up. Just giving my take on it,What did he say that is worthy of a "boycott"?
so now I'm moving on.
I can't say. There are people out thereGoing after heavy hitters/corporate media wont do anything because there is too much collusion, therefore it is easier to go after (boycotting) the little peons instead?
Self defeating, no?
smarter than I just might 'break the code',
that'll get masses movin'. "Self defeating", is
accepting that it can/will never happen, I opine.
Interesting. Don't recall anyone telling 'us' what we should (not) be focused on when cosby hadThe "Pro Black" concepts were about working together.
But when there are elements trying to snatch the movements (of which we are becoming weak at):
- Orange is the New Black
- Gay is the New Black
- Millennials are the New Black
This is what we really should be focused on, as opposed to what Pharrell, Common, Nas, Jay-Z, KRS, Rakim, Lord Jamal, etc says.
our attention. It seem to me, again, that when folks disagree with a celeb(s) is when we wanna dismiss
them as being mere entertainers/celebs. The powers that be won't give them the platform, if they
thought it was a waste of time. Do they, those powers, know something we don't know?
And those "_____ is the New Black", they are being addressed. Just
not on corporate mainstream media much. And if they are, they
are given about as much time as boyce (and intellectual likes), was
in speaking critically to "empire".
That question has several or more answers, for which I amWhere are all the black networks???
sure you know at least one.
Cool. No problem.By the way, thanks for responding... this is a sensitive subject for some, and many don't care to interject in dialog in it, knee jerk responses are expected (as I was guilty of, because of sound bite and clips presented for sensationalism).