Black People Politics : Which One is More Treasonous?

[thePreacher]

So what do you suggest we do when Obama leaves office in 2016?

I am strongly suggesting that people in general, and black people in particular, should be fighting Obama and everything he stands for right now, now after he leaves office. He has proven himself to be an enemy of all people of integrity, regardless of race.

He is _NOT_ the man most Black Americans want to believe he is. By the time he returned from his first trip to Kenya in 1988, he was 100% committed to the worst goals of White Supremacy. There were signs even before 1988 that he was in love with the White way [such as the fact that he was as bad as OJ and Tiger Woods when it came to his preference for white women until he decided to be a politician instead of a lawyer].

There is no non-White person alive today who has ordered the deaths of more human beings [most of them brown Muslims] than Barack Hussein Obama. And, just look at him. Clearly, he is not losing a moments sleep over what he has done. Sadly, nor are his legions of Black supporters.

 

[chuck]

Most black folk don't go as deep into it all as some whites do and only a few of other ethnic minorities do too...

Though his mostly (big) talk/no (real) action approach, i. e., on their issues/problems/etc., is bound to get contrasted with the reality checks/wake up calls they get anyhow...

So stay tuned...

 

[chuck]

In all due honesty and respect, it is time we stopped going on the defensive, i. e., and it is not us advocating breaking the law etc. to advance our self serving agendas, sis..

 

[Gorilla]

Between the two, which one is worse? Violating the constitution or exposing the violation of the constitution? I think that violating the constitution is worse because we are supposed to have a guarantee of privacy of our property, goods, etc. Something like wiretapping, has been a controversy for a few years I guess (or probably longer) If wiretapping was court ordered, that's fine, but the random wiretapping of millions of people in hopes that somewhere there is a terrorist, that's going too far. How long before they start reading our mail? Hell they already read our emails. Anyways, going back to the question, in case I threw you off: Which one is worse? Violating the constitution or exposing the violation of the constitution?

Exposing it is far more patriotic than spying.

The justification for spying is always flimsy. What crimes or terrorist have ever been stopped by broad surveillance?

Didn't stop the pressure cooker and backpack plot of Boston.

 

[sekou kasimu]

I am strongly suggesting that people in general, and black people in particular, should be fighting Obama and everything he stands for right now, now after he leaves office. He has proven himself to be an enemy of all people of integrity, regardless of race.

He is _NOT_ the man most Black Americans want to believe he is. By the time he returned from his first trip to Kenya in 1988, he was 100% committed to the worst goals of White Supremacy. There were signs even before 1988 that he was in love with the White way [such as the fact that he was as bad as OJ and Tiger Woods when it came to his preference for white women until he decided to be a politician instead of a lawyer].

There is no non-White person alive today who has ordered the deaths of more human beings [most of them brown Muslims] than Barack Hussein Obama. And, just look at him. Clearly, he is not losing a moments sleep over what he has done. Sadly, nor are his legions of Black supporters.

"brown Muslims"? Does that mean because they are not white they are on our side? Nonsense! There are a lot of Arabized Afrikans fighting for Arab imperialism, just like there are a lot of Europeanized Afrikans, "black Christians", fighting for European imperialism. There is no difference between the two! Like an old lady said, "it's a mess I tell you"!