- Aug 4, 2023
- 526
- 118
- Occupation
- Web Developer
I realized too late that these subjects really deserve their own threads.
Frankster:
Gaia doesn't Judge...Gaia operates along lines of Natural Laws and Principles.
If you are in alignment or accordance with these Laws and Principles then you are Blessed....
If you behave contrary to these Laws and Principles then you are Accursed...
If However you Understand these Laws and Principles then there is the Potential for you to Manipulate them to your desires....Almost Godlike(Science and Spirituality)
One of the reasons why this can get deep very quickly goes back to something else you (Frankser) said. Which is "All is mind".
We, so far, have a very weak understanding of this. There are gurus and people who claim mastery of esoteric information. This, of course, becomes an industry, where said gurus can make money or gain following, setting up the same sort of money/power dynamic that has represented "the church" throughout time. And I think its hard to sort of stay neutral and out of all the group-think. Because inevitably we start trusting a particular source and that source has the pressure of having to answer all questions. I think we're also starting to learn that one religion doesn't have all the answers, so that's good.
The cross between science and spirituality is probably where I'm most interested and also where I trust people the least. It's not 100% because people lie, cheat, and steal, but because experiences of the mind, like dreams, are very subjective in nature. What one person sees may be a product of their own mind and subconscious interacting via neural pathways running through their imagination.
I there is a collective aspect to our consciousness then it likely extends to our imagination. Whether it is shared directly, indirectly, our imagination infuences each other. We even reference mental images of fictional stories to create iconic points of relation. How much influences do these shared ideas really have? Are they influencing our subconscious? Is there a superconscious that is being influenced as well OR EVEN where that influence originates.
And if the part of our mind that can create images and ideas can produce virtual worlds alternate realities of history and science, then how do we know that we're not creating other things or bringing thoughts to life in other ways? After all, the most direct manifestation of this is an inventor dreaming up an idea and then building it.
Where I struggle from a scientific perspective is that, as with the mind itself having a hardware component (the brain) to run on, I feel like everything in reality is a product of hardware and sofware, but with the key being that hardware is a sort of "lower level" (lower vibration) of energy. And that's what makes it "hard"-ware rather than "soft". We use energy to channel energy. But what if we didn't need that physical channel? What if you could simply project energy like we do with our voices; but perhaps with a sympathetic response from whatever one might be able to control - sort of like talking to Alexa.
I can manipulate many of the lights in my house with my voice but that doesn't work unless there is a system and devices that not only have that capability but also operate on the same "network".
Frankster:
Gaia doesn't Judge...Gaia operates along lines of Natural Laws and Principles.
If you are in alignment or accordance with these Laws and Principles then you are Blessed....
If you behave contrary to these Laws and Principles then you are Accursed...
If However you Understand these Laws and Principles then there is the Potential for you to Manipulate them to your desires....Almost Godlike(Science and Spirituality)
One of the reasons why this can get deep very quickly goes back to something else you (Frankser) said. Which is "All is mind".
We, so far, have a very weak understanding of this. There are gurus and people who claim mastery of esoteric information. This, of course, becomes an industry, where said gurus can make money or gain following, setting up the same sort of money/power dynamic that has represented "the church" throughout time. And I think its hard to sort of stay neutral and out of all the group-think. Because inevitably we start trusting a particular source and that source has the pressure of having to answer all questions. I think we're also starting to learn that one religion doesn't have all the answers, so that's good.
The cross between science and spirituality is probably where I'm most interested and also where I trust people the least. It's not 100% because people lie, cheat, and steal, but because experiences of the mind, like dreams, are very subjective in nature. What one person sees may be a product of their own mind and subconscious interacting via neural pathways running through their imagination.
I there is a collective aspect to our consciousness then it likely extends to our imagination. Whether it is shared directly, indirectly, our imagination infuences each other. We even reference mental images of fictional stories to create iconic points of relation. How much influences do these shared ideas really have? Are they influencing our subconscious? Is there a superconscious that is being influenced as well OR EVEN where that influence originates.
And if the part of our mind that can create images and ideas can produce virtual worlds alternate realities of history and science, then how do we know that we're not creating other things or bringing thoughts to life in other ways? After all, the most direct manifestation of this is an inventor dreaming up an idea and then building it.
Where I struggle from a scientific perspective is that, as with the mind itself having a hardware component (the brain) to run on, I feel like everything in reality is a product of hardware and sofware, but with the key being that hardware is a sort of "lower level" (lower vibration) of energy. And that's what makes it "hard"-ware rather than "soft". We use energy to channel energy. But what if we didn't need that physical channel? What if you could simply project energy like we do with our voices; but perhaps with a sympathetic response from whatever one might be able to control - sort of like talking to Alexa.
I can manipulate many of the lights in my house with my voice but that doesn't work unless there is a system and devices that not only have that capability but also operate on the same "network".