- Jan 1, 2005
- 772
- 47
Therious said:the arguement i would give is that northr/west africa was not always inhabited by arabs. i believe after a series of wars and natural disaster blacks lost control of this area. i would argue many moors were of mixed blood after the arabs took these lands as today you find most nations the conquering class has mixed with the original citizens.i have read the moors were african..dark,light, brown, ect. including arabs, and mixed breeds.
i have read that moor means black to the ancient romans also. although i was not alive then so no one can say for certain. What prrof can be provided of hanibals identity one way or the other? is it not true hannibal was of carthage? was carthage not an afrikan empire?
If I'm not mistaken Carthage was a Phonecian (sp?) colony in North Africa. Long before the Arabs came to the Maghreb, their were Berbers, and Berbers ( except for the Tuareg and maybe some other I don't know about) are clearly not racially Black people. You can google image Berbers, some of them look White, others no different then Arabs.