I ask you, the jury, to examine just this evidence, and answer the question with a yes or a no (is it true/the truth/true/a fact): Did the media deceive us, and knowingly put out information in such a way, and number of times, that it painted a picture, and story, of a young, innocent boy who was minding his own business when circumstances outside his control led to him being harassed because of race and ultimately shot because of his race, when all available information, including information that was available to them -- you know this because it was available to you so …, paints an almost completely opposite picture of the boy, and the story?
Lies the Media Told Me: The Truth in the Trayvon Martin Case
--Watch the whole thing. Even disregarding the text, the images ….
Trayvon vs Zimmerman: Mainstream Media Weapon of Mass Distraction
Trayvon Martin evidence "Eye Witness"
Mainstream Media Trying to Create Backlash for Trayvon Martin Shooting
--The mainstream media going on about race and racism, and in connection to the case of a young Black male? Yeah right. Never … unless ….
Note: The question/issue is not whether Trayvon is innocent, somewhat innocent, somewhat guilty, or guilty; nor is it whether Zimmerman is innocent, somewhat innocent, somewhat guilty, or guilty. The issue is what the mainstream media did.
Additional questions to ponder:
--Did an overwhelming majority of the information say Boy = Innocent, Man = guilty, Man shot and murdered boy because of his race?
--Does it fit under/into the category of Domestic Terrorism? > Gun control …?
--In the midst of all of this, wasn’t there a small little voice saying (… in fine print): “Florida’s stand your ground law”?
--Isn’t it agitating race relations between Blacks and Whites? Wouldn’t that be known beforehand?
Note:
Race: the logical determination the current population of Americans would make provided the “evidence”/information they were Provided With. Especially with information that said “White Male” (pictures they selected to show first; with First being the scientifically proven most critical time for information to be introduced for major permanence)
Oddities/Red Flags:
--The majority of the media outlets were releasing favorable information, the majority of the releases/instances it was brought up/instances it was outputted was favorable to the idea of “an innocent, young black boy being shot dead due to racial stereotypes on the part of a gun-totting citizen with a badge.”
--Information that was shaped to target emotions and Care and Concern (Example: slow zooms-ins into a selected, innocent-looking image/picture of boy, while soft, sad, tragic music is played)
The media went from “Don’t care about young Black males” and knowingly negatively portraying young Black males, to portraying a young Black male as an innocent victim who was victimized because he was black?
--The time they spent on the story (few days went to weeks when days normally wouldn’t happen on such a story).
--The number of times they outputted the occurrences of marches, demonstrations, and other support for the young Black boy that were happening throughout America; something that never occurs. That equals the media saying “Look at how many people are supporting him,” which equals in most current Americans minds: “Everyone else is supporting him” which equals “Popular thing to do” which equals “Best thing to do”
--What was said during the output of the marches, demonstrations, and other shows of support, and how it was said, was mostly favorable.
--The appearance of those who represent --means in the minds of Americans -- “Don’t worry Black people, we have this fight.” and "This is serious!" The wolves in sheep clothing, under full government control. NAACP, The New Black Panthers, Al Sharpton, and Jessie Jackson (People change, and get changed. Don’t believe me? An example can be found in the documentary “MAAFA 21”)
***Wanna test em? Get this to them and see what they say and do: http://howmanyknow.com/2012/04/justice-or-just-us/
--A movement created, represented by a symbolic act. The Hoodie.
--The number of times the media Outputted a “Greater Than Normal Person” saying/showing support for the boy/boy’s side, and the “Greatness” of those “Greater Than Normal People” outputted.
It’s not possible? Here is a pretty recent Prior I spoke of before:
http://howmanyknow.com/2012/02/michelle-obamas-target-store-hoax/
Lies the Media Told Me: The Truth in the Trayvon Martin Case
--Watch the whole thing. Even disregarding the text, the images ….
Trayvon vs Zimmerman: Mainstream Media Weapon of Mass Distraction
Trayvon Martin evidence "Eye Witness"
Mainstream Media Trying to Create Backlash for Trayvon Martin Shooting
--The mainstream media going on about race and racism, and in connection to the case of a young Black male? Yeah right. Never … unless ….
Note: The question/issue is not whether Trayvon is innocent, somewhat innocent, somewhat guilty, or guilty; nor is it whether Zimmerman is innocent, somewhat innocent, somewhat guilty, or guilty. The issue is what the mainstream media did.
Additional questions to ponder:
--Did an overwhelming majority of the information say Boy = Innocent, Man = guilty, Man shot and murdered boy because of his race?
--Does it fit under/into the category of Domestic Terrorism? > Gun control …?
--In the midst of all of this, wasn’t there a small little voice saying (… in fine print): “Florida’s stand your ground law”?
--Isn’t it agitating race relations between Blacks and Whites? Wouldn’t that be known beforehand?
Note:
Race: the logical determination the current population of Americans would make provided the “evidence”/information they were Provided With. Especially with information that said “White Male” (pictures they selected to show first; with First being the scientifically proven most critical time for information to be introduced for major permanence)
Oddities/Red Flags:
--The majority of the media outlets were releasing favorable information, the majority of the releases/instances it was brought up/instances it was outputted was favorable to the idea of “an innocent, young black boy being shot dead due to racial stereotypes on the part of a gun-totting citizen with a badge.”
--Information that was shaped to target emotions and Care and Concern (Example: slow zooms-ins into a selected, innocent-looking image/picture of boy, while soft, sad, tragic music is played)
The media went from “Don’t care about young Black males” and knowingly negatively portraying young Black males, to portraying a young Black male as an innocent victim who was victimized because he was black?
--The time they spent on the story (few days went to weeks when days normally wouldn’t happen on such a story).
--The number of times they outputted the occurrences of marches, demonstrations, and other support for the young Black boy that were happening throughout America; something that never occurs. That equals the media saying “Look at how many people are supporting him,” which equals in most current Americans minds: “Everyone else is supporting him” which equals “Popular thing to do” which equals “Best thing to do”
- Remember, the government and media said they would no longer output the number of those attending Million Man marches? Why? A show of support for The Cause ends up being support for The Cause, in most people, especially Americans.
--What was said during the output of the marches, demonstrations, and other shows of support, and how it was said, was mostly favorable.
--The appearance of those who represent --means in the minds of Americans -- “Don’t worry Black people, we have this fight.” and "This is serious!" The wolves in sheep clothing, under full government control. NAACP, The New Black Panthers, Al Sharpton, and Jessie Jackson (People change, and get changed. Don’t believe me? An example can be found in the documentary “MAAFA 21”)
***Wanna test em? Get this to them and see what they say and do: http://howmanyknow.com/2012/04/justice-or-just-us/
- --What a coincidence it is that the New Black Panthers have the exact same image as the image created by the FBI, media, and others for the original Black Panthers -- Violent, Racist, Gang (the smear campaign that was done). It’s a program that is still intact in the minds of most Americans today, Black and White. The Cure: Fair judgment and information (the right information).
- Look at what happened when the originals said self defense; look at what happened, and has happened when the new BPs say proactive, murder and assault. How are they alive, shown to you, allowed a platform, not discredited by journalist’s commentary, etc?
- Feel …. Do you sense love and concern for oppressed and poor, especially Black, or do you sense Good Actor? Can you see “Act”?
--A movement created, represented by a symbolic act. The Hoodie.
- Recall Edward Bernays, the author of “Propaganda,” and his intentional creation of an event that made women smoking cigarettes an acceptable practice in America (Can be found in “The Century of Self”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhxfArTAcfM)
- The Hoodie, even graced by a former Black Panther who is now a Congressman. That only brings attention to the fact that a Former Black Panther is now a Congressman. Huh? Study the Panthers and you’ll see why that in itself casts suspicion on him, and thus the authenticity of his act. Was it true, or staged? That should remain open.
--The number of times the media Outputted a “Greater Than Normal Person” saying/showing support for the boy/boy’s side, and the “Greatness” of those “Greater Than Normal People” outputted.
A symphony of deceit. Propaganda.
It’s not possible? Here is a pretty recent Prior I spoke of before:
http://howmanyknow.com/2012/02/michelle-obamas-target-store-hoax/