- May 7, 2009
- 6,371
- 2,947
What!!!?
What!!!?
What a shock!
First of all, I am so surprised that you have responded to me! Secondly, If I have misunderstood the entire premises of your book, please forgive me. I hope that you will come back!--Or at least be open to my desire to speak with you! I in no means mean to discredit you at all! I hope you understand that I love your book!
In regards to 'Aztecs' not being white or 'Olmecs' not being white, I absolutely agree. I in no way define the Aztecs as being white, nor the Olmecs. And as far as you revealing that 'the Cali' in 'California' means 'black' on the internet in 1997--Brilliant.
I absolutely do not want you to believe that I think something is wrong with you and only hope that you will give me a chance! As I did write though, the geographical writings in the Bible and etc. is what I draw from. In addition, it is my research and understanding of the word 'corn' in context refers to many other meanings including the term 'barleycorn'. I so agree too, that the corn in the ancient Americas is indigenous to that region. I have researched the ancient Mayan Corn festivals and compared this to the ancient Egyptian barley festivals and etc.
I sure do hope that you give me a chance. I love your research.
Sincerely.
So, Chevron,
You think you know what's wrong with that author of "When Rocks Cry Out?"
Well, here he is.
And no darling, you have misunderstood the entire premise of that book. The biblical writings DO NOT say the events happened in the place now calling itself "Middle East." The biblical writings say those Africans called Hebrews took Egypt's cities, where there is an abundance of "corn." Joseph interpreted the Pharaoh's dream about 7 EARS OF CORN.
But as your encyclopedia informs you, "corn" was indigenous ONLY TO THE AMERICAS in ancient times. But it's ok, that's why I wrote that book--to help the perceptions get their understanding back.
And no, neither the Africans called, derisively, "Aztec," nor the Africans called "Olmec" were white. And you misunderstand who the ruling people were when Cortes arrived. The Africans were those rulers, not the Indians.
And not only do I know of the events that were occurring in Europe at the time of the arrival of the Africans in the 1300s, but I saw those letters that these Africans wrote to Spain to attempt to make them stop warring against the Moors in Spain in the 1400s.
And finally, I am that man who gave that lecture in 1997 that revealed that California was named for the Cali. That was this man who put that out on the Internet for others to begin citing it. Que that.
What!!!?
What a shock!
First of all, I am so surprised that you have responded to me! Secondly, If I have misunderstood the entire premises of your book, please forgive me. I hope that you will come back!--Or at least be open to my desire to speak with you! I in no means mean to discredit you at all! I hope you understand that I love your book!
In regards to 'Aztecs' not being white or 'Olmecs' not being white, I absolutely agree. I in no way define the Aztecs as being white, nor the Olmecs. And as far as you revealing that 'the Cali' in 'California' means 'black' on the internet in 1997--Brilliant.
I absolutely do not want you to believe that I think something is wrong with you and only hope that you will give me a chance! As I did write though, the geographical writings in the Bible and etc. is what I draw from. In addition, it is my research and understanding of the word 'corn' in context refers to many other meanings including the term 'barleycorn'. I so agree too, that the corn in the ancient Americas is indigenous to that region. I have researched the ancient Mayan Corn festivals and compared this to the ancient Egyptian barley festivals and etc.
I sure do hope that you give me a chance. I love your research.
Sincerely.