Black Spirituality Religion : When Its Speak Of The Word In John 1 ; 1 Was It Copied From The Egyptian Story

Discussion in 'Black Spirituality / Religion - General Discussion' started by IssaEl21, Aug 29, 2004.

  1. IssaEl21

    IssaEl21 Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,253
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4
    When Its Speak Of The Word In John 1 ; 1 Was It Copied From The Egyptian Story .
    Answer Yes ;... Let Me Explaing The Meaning . Before I Do This , I Must Make It Clear That Its Very Important To Read The Scripture From The Original Language In Which It Was Translated From , Not The Poor English Mistranslation To Get The Proper Meaning . So If You Want To Know TheTrue Translation Of John 1 ; 1 , You Have To Go Back To Its Original Language That It Was Written In . If You Take
    John 1 ; 1 , Which Was Written By John While In Ephesius . The Capital Of Ionia , In Asia Minor , Which Is A Part Of Greece , You Will See Why It Has Been Translated To The Greek Language < John , Son Of Zebedee , St . John The Divine > But The Book John Itself Is Of Hebrew Origin , Yokhanan , Jochanan , Who Was A Disciple Of Yashua , Known As John Son Of Zebedee , And He Was From Galilee , Which Means That Greek Was Not His Language . He Was A Fisherman From Bethsaida, Which Was A Fishing Town Located On The North Shore Of The Sea Of Galilee . Because He Came From Galilee . He Spoke Palestinian . Galilean , And An Aramic Form Of Arabic . Not Greek Or Latin . And When It Speaks Of The Day Of Pentecost In Acts Chapter 2 , Verse 4 . John Son Of Zebedee Matthew 10 ; 2 Was One Of The Disciples Of Jesus Speaking In Different Tongues / Languages . And If You God To Acts Chapter 2 Verse 7 It Reads .
    Bible -- New Testament , Acts 2 ; 7 And I Quote . And They Were All Amazed And Marvelled , Saying One To Another , Behold , Are Not All These Which Speak Galilacans ? ;.... Was John The Baptish Related To Yashua ? Yes . John The Baptist Was The Son Of Zacharias And Elizabeth , Who Was Mary's Cousin . Thus . The Was The Cousin Of Yashua . Yashua Was From Galilee According To Matthew 21 ; 11, Which Reads ; '' And The Multitudr Said , This Is Yashua The Prophet ( Prof - Ay - Trace ) Of Nazareth Of Galiless ( Gal - ll - Ah - Yah ) . So He Also Spoke Arabic . That Was His Native Tongue . AndThe Greek Word Galilaia ,
    ( Gal - ll - Ah - Yah ) Meaning '' Circuit '' Comes From TheHebrew Word Galiy ,
    ( Gaw - Lee ) Or ( Prolonged ) Galiyah ( Gaw- Lee - Law ) Meaning '' Circuit . District . '' ( John TheBaptist 6 - 36 A.D. The Forerunner Of Yashua / Zacharias . , Father Of John The Baptist ) ;.... John Son Of Zebedee And Salomes '' Language Was Galilean . A Semetic Language , Consisting Of Hebrew And Arabic , But It Was Arabic . And To This Day . They Still Speak Arabic . That Means , If He Indeed Received This Revelation From God Through TheSpirit , Then That God Would Be The Same God Of The Father Jacob , Isaac . And Abraham Genesis 28 ; 13 , Exodus 3 ; 6 , Acts 7 ; 32 , AndHis Language Would Be The Bible Language , The Old Testament Language , Which They Say Is Hebrew , So Therefore , John As A Hebrew Or Israelite Jacobite . Would Receive His Book In That Language AndIt Was Translated To Greek . ( Isaac / Jacob Son Of Rebecca And Esau ) ;... So With That In Mind , Now Let's LQQk At John 1 ; 1 The Way He . Yokhanan Bar Zebedee Would HaveReceived It , And See What DifferenceThe Word ''' Word '' Means . LQQk At This ; In Hebrew, The Word For Son Is Bar And In Aramic Its '' Ben '' Or Ibn . So The Original LanguageOf TheBible Was Syria Or Arabic , AndLater It Became Aramic Or Hebrew.
    John 1 ;1 Translated From Hebrew
    In ( Bah ) The Beginning ( Bara-Sheeth ) Was ( Haw - Yah ) The Word ( Ha-Daw-Bar )
    And ( Wa ) The Word ( Haw-Daw-Bar ) Was ( Haw-Yah ) With ( Ayth ) Gods ( Eloheem ) ;... If You LQQk Carefully At This Translation , And Take Into Though That The First Book Of The Bible Is Genesis '' The Genealogy Of Isis , The Wife Of Osiris '' . Then When It Says In John 1 ; 1 '' In The Beginning Was The Word And The Word Was With God '' . You Will See That The Equivalent To TheGreek Word For God '' Thehos '' Would Be '' Eloheem '' And This '' Eloheem Is Plural . Not Singular . No God Back To Genesis And The First Time You See The Word God As Eloheem . Why Is Their A Jehovah And An Eloheem ? Because Jehovah , Like Bar , Is Aramic / Hebrew '' And Eloheem , Like Ben , Is Syria / Arabic '' . That's Why If You Read Genesis 10 ; 22 , In It You See That Ashuric / Arabic '' Was Before Aramic / Hebrew'' Then You Have ALine For Aramic / Hebrew In Verse 23 , Then You Also Get A Line For Arphaxad In Verse 24 , Who Father Eber '' Hebrew '' Not None For Asshur . The Arab . Because They Called This The Hebrew Bible . It Is Used As A Plural In The Hebrew , So If The Story Of Creation According To The Bible Began In Genesis 1 ; 1 , Then When You Go Back To John 1 ; 1 , You Will See That This God '' Thehos '' Is Not A Songle God , But God Form . '' Eloheem '' . Then John 1 ; 1 Would Be Correctly Translated As '' '' In The Beginning Was The Conversation , And The Conversation Was With '' Eloheem ( Gods ) '' And The Conversation Was About '' Eloheem ( Gods ) .
    What Was This Conversation ? In The Beginnig , The Conversation Or Words Being Spoken Were Amongst The Gods ( Eloheem , Thehos , Alihaat ) Creating Other Gods Called Son Of God ( Genesis 6 ; 2,4 ) Taken From The Egiptian Doctrine Of Ra Uttering Forth The Decree And Created Supreme Beings , If You Translate John 1 ; 1 In The Hebrew Language , That John Received , As I Mentioned Before , You Don't Get The Implication That It's Talking About Yashua ;... Wouldn't The Gods Be Plural Through The Father , Son And Holy Ghost ? No . It Would Be A Trinity Or Triad , Another Egyptian Concept . And The Holy Ghost Is Not A Person , So You Don't Get 3 Persons In One As They Say . Its A Spirit , And The Son Is Not The Everliving God . Which I Will Explain Later . As I Mentioned Earlier . The Greek Word Thehos Is Plural . And Would Translate To Be Eloheem In Hebrew . However . Ryrie Study Bible , Page 7 , Colum 1 States ; '' God . Lit ... Elohim , A Generic Term For Deity As Well As A Proper Name ForThe True God . Its Basic Meaning Is Strong One , Mighty Learder , Supreme Deity . The Form Of The Word Is Plural , Indicating Plentitude Of Power And Majesty And Allowing For The N.T. Revelation Of The Triunity Of TheGodhead '' .
    Adam'sClarke's Commentary ----Genesis 1 ; 1 State
    '' The Original Word Elohim , God , Is Certainly The Plural Form Of El . Or Eloah , And Has Long Been Supposed . By The Most Eminently Learned And Pious Men . To Imply A Plurality Of Persons In The DivineNature . As This Plurality Appears In So Many Parts Of The Sacred Writings To Be Confined To Three Persons . Hence The Doctrine Of TRINITY . Which Has Formed A Part Of The Creed Of All Those Who Have Been Deemed Sound In The Faith . From The Earlies Ages Of Christianity . Nor Are TheChristians Singular In Receiving ThisDoctrine . And In Deriving It From The First Words Of Divine Revelation . An Eminent Jewish Rabbin . Simeon Ben Joachi , In His Comment On The Sixth . Section Of Leviticas . Has These Remarkable Words ; '' Come And See The Mystery Of The Word Elohim ; There Are Three Degrees , And Each Degree By Itself Alone , And Yet Notwithstanding They Are All One , And Joined Together In One , And Are Not Divided From Each Other , '' See Ainsworth . He Must Be Strangely Prejudiced Indeed Who Cannot See That The Doctrine Of A Trinity AndOf A Trinity In Unity , Is Expressed In The Above Words .
    Charles Caldwell Ryrie , Th . D .. , The Author Of Ryrie Study Bible, Is Making TheImplication That The Word Eloheem Is A Plural Because Of The Power Attributed To It . However . He Also States That Eloheem Is The Triunity Or Trinity Of The Godhead One God . ;.... Doesn't The Trinity Originate In Ancient Egipt As Well ? This God - Head Trinity Also Came From The Egiptian Deity Amun Revelation 3;14
    Who Is One Of A God-Head Trinity . Being Amun - Ra . Or Re , With Atum - Ra Or '' Re '' And Atun - Ra Or Re '' For The Three Motions And Movement Of The Most High Egiptian Deity '' Re '' The Morning Sun ( Dabar ) . Amun -Re ( Amen -Ra ) Is The Sun Deity Of Ancient Egipt . As A Plural . Also Called Aten - Ra As A Singular And Atum - Re ( Atom - Ra ) As The Creator . The Original Egiptian Trinity Of Life . So The Trinity Of 1John 5 ; 7 - 8 Is Not Speaking About The Father , Yashua And The Holy Ghost . But It Is Speaking About The Supreme Beings, Thehos , Eloheem Or Alihaat . Having A Conversation . It Was Gods Creating Gods And Natures .
    Bible - New Testament 1John 5 ; 7 - 8 And I Quote , For there are three that bear record in heaven , the father the word , and the Holy Ghost ; and these three are one . And there are three that bear witness in earth , the spirit , and thewater , andthe blood ; and these three agree in one
    Note You Have In Verse 7 ; 1 . Father 2 . The Word 3 . The Holy Ghost . The Again In Verse 8 ; 1. The Spirit 2. The Water 3 . The Blood . Where Did The Get The Father . The Son And The Holy Ghost ? THEY JUST MADE IT UP . :read:
     
  2. AACOOLDRE

    AACOOLDRE Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2001
    Messages:
    2,447
    Likes Received:
    364
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Teacher
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +400
    This was a cool essay. So are you saying Genesis is a deviation of Isis?

    Isis was sybolic of Nun/water the first element to give Genesis/beginnings to the others.
     
  3. AACOOLDRE

    AACOOLDRE Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2001
    Messages:
    2,447
    Likes Received:
    364
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Teacher
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +400
    Your correct about Amun/Amen from Revelation 3:14

    “These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God” –Rev 3:14



    In Egypt, at the outset of the 18th Dynasty: Hail to Amen-Ra…Lord of Truth, father of the gods, who made man and created animals, lord of everything, creator of the tree of life”-Egypt, Canaan, and Israel in ancient times by Donald Redford p.230
     
  4. Angela22

    Angela22 Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2013
    Messages:
    6,594
    Likes Received:
    2,895
    Gender:
    Female
    Ratings:
    +3,324
    Nah, the Holy Doctrine is the Original and Only Word of the Father. Those who wouldn't believe what the Son has did for us in His sacrifice for our iniquities think the Scriptures is but a copy of others works, but that's not so.

    To many, that's how they justify to themselves not believing in the works of the Father and the Son, and not having faith in the One Resurrected the 3rd day, which has brought us to salvation, when they should have these things. Nevertheless, all who live in the Spirit of the Father have wisdom as to how the Holy Doctrine could never have been copied from anywhere else, but is the Word of the KING written of His Holy.
     
Loading...