Black People : Undeniable Proof the Media is Manipulating the Election Process

Discussion in 'Black People Open Forum' started by Writeous1, Sep 4, 2011.

  1. Writeous1

    Writeous1 Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2010
    Messages:
    522
    Likes Received:
    190
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Sacramento, California
    Ratings:
    +202
    First off, I am not on any side, and I do not endorse any candidate. My intention is to show exactly what the title of this post states.

    Watching the Sunday talk shows and looking at the reporting from this weekend’s Republican straw poll, you would not think that Congressman Ron Paul even participated in the event. Paul came in a very close second to Representative Michele Bachmann in a field of Presidential Candidates. Bachmann received 4,823 votes; Paul received 4,671 votes, which represents a margin of just 152 votes. To me, it appears to be a statistical dead heat, especially when you consider the next closest competitor, Governor Tim Pawlenty, received only 2,293 votes. Pawlenty’s distant third place finish effectively blew him out of the race. Source: http://www.infowars.com/why-does-mainstream-media-disrespect-ron-paul/

    Watch this:



    Establishment Media Admits Conspiracy To Ignore Ron Paul
    http://www.infowars.com/establishment-media-admits-conspiracy-to-ignore-ron-paul/

    Pew Research Evidence Corporate Media Connived to Ignore Ron Paul
    http://www.infowars.com/pew-research-evidence-corporate-media-connived-to-ignore-ron-paul/

    [​IMG]


    This is a much older, unrelated documentary which at one point focuses on the exact same media manipulation being done to another candidate.
    Watch 16:43 - 20:58

    Watch the whole documentary to see some of what goes on behind the scenes. This is good.

    You can't even be mentioned as a top candidate if you are actually serious about changing real issues (poverty, homelessness, ghetto, wars, Federal Reserve, etc.). This shows you that if the controllers of the media --the owners, board of directors, and/or the men the media-heads meet with at the CFR, Bohemian Grove, and Bilderberg-- didn't want Obama, he would have hardly been shown to you or mentioned to you! The media selects the candidates, you then select from those they've chosen. And if it's a presidential race, the Electors then choose the president:


    Wake up.
     
  2. Ankhur

    Ankhur Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2009
    Messages:
    14,710
    Likes Received:
    3,006
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    owner of various real estate concerns
    Location:
    Brooklyn
    Ratings:
    +3,014
    at first glance in regards to local black candidates, and libertarans, this could be said to be preaching to the choir,
    but the wisdom and intellecual factor, mentioned here regarding, who is presented, to us by corporate media,
    resonates with historical clarity!!!!!!!!!!!


    After JFK was assasinated, or ecexecuted,
    al of the following Demcratic candidates for POTUS, where generaly ,
    unknown!!!!!

    I did not here about James Carter until only on Black talk radio a the time, on an ad for "Jimmy Carter" for president anounced by Martin Luther King Sr, so I thugh he was Black, until I saw him on television,
    now he was catered to us,
    but he was brought to the Biderberg group bynone other hen Brzezinski, for aproval, and had Rockeffellor as a VP to keep him in line.
    Although maintaning a predominantly progresive administration,, he
    created enough executive orders, to literaly shred the constitution,
    paving the way for any impending neocon to take advantage of.

    Bill Clinton, who ever heard of him?? and he was packaged to us as a white "negro" president.
    But he in 1999 destroyed Glass Steagall, wrecking the citizenries life savings, mortgages and pensions,
    and created GATT and NAFTA that destroyed the manufacturing base of this nation, impoverising millions in factory towns all over America,
    that paved the way for the incoming GOP fascist to loot the nation legally.
     
  3. Writeous1

    Writeous1 Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2010
    Messages:
    522
    Likes Received:
    190
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Sacramento, California
    Ratings:
    +202
    Was there a lot of bankers in the Carter Administration? I think I heard that somewhere.
     
  4. jamesfrmphilly

    jamesfrmphilly going above and beyond PREMIUM MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    Messages:
    31,991
    Likes Received:
    11,477
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    retired computer geek
    Location:
    north philly ghetto
    Ratings:
    +13,731
    yes, i noticed that about ron paul. the media shut him out. it was obvious.
     
  5. Bootzey

    Bootzey Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,901
    Likes Received:
    770
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    Don't Ask
    Location:
    Metro ATL
    Ratings:
    +862
    And this is why it's important to do your own research and make decisions based on that information. Not what folks put out there
     
  6. Writeous1

    Writeous1 Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2010
    Messages:
    522
    Likes Received:
    190
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Sacramento, California
    Ratings:
    +202
    Organizer Labels Own Poll Irrelevant After Ron Paul Wins

    Paul Joseph Watson
    Infowars.com
    Monday, October 10, 2011
    The principal organizer of the Values Voters Summit derided his own group’s straw poll as irrelevant after Ron Paul won, dismissing the results as not being “truly reflective of where values voters stand.”
    Despite Family Research Council President Tony Perkins telling CBS News that the organization prevented campaigns from buying blocks of tickets for the event, Perkins still “dismissed the results as irrelevant, citing 600 people who registered Saturday morning and, he said, “left after Ron Paul spoke.”
    Congressman Paul won the straw poll after he received 37 per cent of the vote, but Perkins described the result as an “outlier”.
    Even in the course of deriding the accuracy of the poll, Perkins still found time to praise former Kansas City Federal Reserve director Herman Cain, saying there was “something to be said about his results” and his “strong” second place finish.
    Speaking before the results were announced, Congressman Paul stated, “If I win, it wouldn’t be as important to the media than if I lose.”
    Indeed, Perkins’ dismissal of the importance of the poll result continues the trend where straw polls are only deemed important if they are won by establishment Republicans.
    When Michele Bachmann won the Iowa straw poll, the mainstream media gushed with enthusiasm and immediately classified Bachmann as a frontrunner, while completely ignoring Ron Paul’s strong second place showing less than 200 votes behind the Minnesota Republican.
    However, when Ron Paul won a big victory in the California straw poll just weeks later, the corporate press all but blacklisted the story.
    Both CNN and Fox News have also sabotaged their own polls after Ron Paul emerged as the winner, CNN by swapping the poll to get different results and Fox News by deleting it from from their website altogether.
    This process of downplaying Paul’s victories while trumpeting those of his rivals is how the establishment attempts to dictate reality – this is how “frontrunners” are manufactured from the top down. As we reported back in August, mainstream media talking heads have admitted that there is a deliberate policy to sideline, ignore and discredit Paul’s campaign.
    If Ron Paul’s campaign was allowed a level playing field, he would already be in pole position. However, now that both Rick Perry and Mitt Romney’s campaigns have been largely discredited, the establishment has thrown its weight behind Herman Cain, who if anything is even more of an establishment insider, having been chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City in the mid-90′s, while also proving himself to be a keen supporter of the TARP bailout, the Patriot Act, and the unconstitutional wars launched under Bush that have been accelerated by the Obama administration.
    *********************
    Source: http://www.infowars.com/organizer-labels-own-poll-irrelevant-after-ron-paul-wins/

    The "battle" for the next lead actor in the stage play called "American Government."
    There's behind the scenes, and there's live on stage.
    The people swear they're choosing the next lead actor, but those who run/control the play are only using different means to narrow the people's potential down to 2 (out of the many) -- the 2 those who run/control the play wouldn't mind becoming the lead.
    They even have a process by which a small group of "others" (electors) choose; "others" the people/voters don't know of or hear about.
    The people vote, the numbers are tallied (with no proof that they are done correctly, or even done at all), then the group of "others" decide if they want to choose the same -- the same as the people have been guided/directed to choose (at least that's how they say the process goes).
    What results is that the choice of the "others" ends up being what/who the people chose at the voting machines when they were guided/directed to choose 1 of the 2 chosen for them. At least that's what the one's who announce the winner state/report as being the person who the people chose at the voting machines (the people/the voters have no idea ...).
    In the end, everyone is happy!
    The system is praised!
    The people even argue over whether or not voting for the lead should be a right or a privilege!
    Those who don't participate in the system are scorned.

    A stage play where the audience chooses the lead actor ...?
    Let you choose the lead actor and mess up the whole play? Yeah right. There's too much riding on the play.

    If there were a TV show where the audience/viewers chose the lead actor, do you think the controllers, people who are seeking self interests (which may include the interests of others), would actually allow you to choose the lead actor, and as a result, potentially ruin the whole show, and thereby ruin the procurement of those self interests?
    How much more the leads/heads of government?

    If such a TV show were proposed, wouldn't this be the "behind the scenes talk" of the controllers of that TV show when they discussed the idea of letting the viewers choose the lead actor:
    In The Basics of American Politics, the author writes, “The electoral college was created by the authors of the Constitution as another way of filtering what they feared might be the passions and prejudices of the mass of voters.” In another textbook, The Politics of American Government, the authors write, “The framers believed that the general electorate would not make an informed, dispassionate, rational judgment....” In The American Democracy, the author writes, “The delegates believed that ordinary citizens, most of whom could neither read or write, were too poorly informed to choose wisely. More important, the framers feared that popular election could enable a tyrant to capture the presidency by appealing to the people’s fears and prejudices.” The authors of Approaching Democracy claim the Framers wanted “to insulate that office from what they considered the popular passions and transitory fancies of the electorate.” The author of Inside the System writes, “Despite many differences of opinion among the delegates about the executive, there was a slow drift toward two points of agreement: 1) The people should not elect the president because that would be too much democracy....” In The Challenge of Democracy: Government in America, the authors say, “The delegates distrusted the people’s judgment, fearing that public passions might be aroused. Consequently, the delegates rejected the idea of popular election....The electoral college compromise removed the fear of a popular vote for president.” Source: http://gunston.gmu.edu/pfiffner/index_files/Page1080.htm

    You gotta love the election process in this country, it's not like those in other countries.
     
  7. bientempo

    bientempo Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    Dominican Republic
    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2009
    Messages:
    736
    Likes Received:
    141
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Dominican Republic
    Ratings:
    +165
    You gotta love the election process in this country, it's not like those in other countries.

    Writeous1, Today at 5:35 PM Report

    Which other countries are you familiar with? How do you tell a politician is lying, His/Her mouth is moving
     
  8. Black-king

    Black-king Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2011
    Messages:
    1,943
    Likes Received:
    715
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +720
    No way? Why would the media do such a thing? They only report, manipulate and fabricate the news most of the times.
     
  9. Writeous1

    Writeous1 Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2010
    Messages:
    522
    Likes Received:
    190
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Sacramento, California
    Ratings:
    +202
    I was actually quoting what most people in this country have always said.
     
  10. info-moetry

    info-moetry STAFF STAFF

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,724
    Likes Received:
    6,428
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    A+ technician
    Location:
    The rotten Apple
    Ratings:
    +6,486
    peace

    There is no such thing as a VOTE! There is such a thing as the VOTING PROCESS!

    Further, you haven't had a 'president' since Reagan was shot.... Bush Sr. approved the hit and he and his cronies have been running things ever since. He was actually named America's first King during his 'presidency'...

    If we are still having these kinds of talks, it's no wonder why they still get away with what they get away with!!

    I started a thread called 'proof of a fraudulent voting process' about a year ago it contains more than enough info. to let a blind person know that YOU HAVE NO VOTE and all of these primaries and straw polls are just a game they play with you to make you feel like you matter.....

    http://destee.com/index.php?threads/proof-of-a-fraudulent-voting-process.64313/

    "there's nothing worse than to walk the earth and be deprived of your own thoughts"
     
Loading...