As horrific as the event as described in the newspaper account.... if it actually happened....
what struck me most about the video was that the narrator tried to tell me my EYES were lying when I saw a meat cleaver, NOT a "machete" in the man's hand. Which is why I am forced to question if that really is a beheaded man in the streets (what'd the guy do with the head? He didn't have it in his hands with the knife and the MEAT CLEAVER, and I didn't saw it anywhere on the street).
So why does that "machete" comment set off alarm bells in my mind? Because 1) it's a lie and 2) it's a weaponry code word for "black." Which makes me question the truthfulness of the written account of 2 men did it. The video shows only one man. Where was the other (since was a "fresh" kill)? And why does the guy say,"
I'm sorry women and children had to witness this?" If he and another "black" guy did it, why not
WE're sorry....?
Also, the printed account LIES when it reports the guy in the video
said the public and their "children" were targets of extremists. He said no such thing. The ONLY thing he said about women (not the "public" but women) and children was that he was sorry they had to witness it.
Whateva.