Something bothered me. I re-viewed the film. This man's hands are RED with blood.... yet there's no blood on the street around the body. The woman who leans over the body doesn't get up with blood all over her clothing....

The narrator says "the man with blood on his hands goes across the street and talks with another man." The "other" man is black; are we being led/supposed to believe the "other" man is his accomplice? Why couldn't he be just another bystander, like those in the crowd that came up and spoke to the knife/meat cleaver guy?
The more I think on this, the more I'm concluding this is just some