Keita said:
How long will it take for our people on a global basis to get out of the situation we presently find ourselves in? One could say that since it took us 400 hundred years to get in this situation that it may take us 400 to get out. As rational as that sounds, it just isn't true. It actually took us about 3,500 years to get into this situation...so will it take that amount of time on a global basis for the pendulum to swing back to where it was?
I thought this worthy of thought as I began to analyze the rate of change, of growth, of time and of history concerning our plight. Anyone have any feedback on this? Remember, we are not just speaking of our people in America or the western world, but on a global basis.
This is one of the most focused, insightful, probing and pertinent questions I'VE run across on the internet
anywhere, in a long time.
However, I AM curious....specifically at what rate of change, considerations of growth, time and or of history had YOU considered in analytical hypothesis/equations (if any,) and by what standard did YOU find them relative to application regarding any potential theories, or in relation to OUR plight as a People?
The reason I ask this, is because the simple, yet singularly willful act of criminal debasement entrusted and perpetrated in/to voluntary acts if barbarianism toward OUR People, to date has been the sole culprit/vehicle
in exacting itself as the clear misery of OUR People.
And such acts are not scientific.*
Also baring in mind, that nowhere in history (since the industrial "revolution,") has "knowledge," travel, communication, opportunistic criminality/character depravity ect; been more accessible or numerous to the peoples of this earth, than they are now.
**For example, this is what he asserts "science" is:
The "roots" of analytical science are to be found in the Greek culture. "Without the analytical habit which had been kept alive by Euclid's Elements and Aristotle's writings, Kepler, Galileo, and Newton, as well as all the great men of science that came later, would have had to join the Sino-Indians in contemplative and casual observation of nature. To the extent to which we may turn history around in thought, we may reason that without the peculiar love the Greeks had for Understanding, our knowledge would not by far have reached its present level; nor would modern civilization be what it is today. For better or for worse, we have not yet discovered one single problem of Understanding, that the Greek philosophers did not formulate." [after Georgescu-Roegen p. 38:] Unluckily we have to ad, that most of the really vital problems, already formulated by the Greek, have not been solved. Especially the question on how society develops or should develop and how the individual should act. Those questions, for development the most important ones, can't be tackled by causal analysis, as there are no other societies or planets where similar processes might be observed.
newton? aristotle? (and) The "great men of science" that came "later?"
Surely if he can promote this....ANYTHING on this "superhighway"
of uncertainty is now possible.
Again Professor Gabriel Oyibo (GAGUT)
has already changed the world BACK to ANCIENT DAYS of BLACK RULERSHIP,
it's just a matter of time until the "tail catches up with the dog."
ROARIN.......