te
Tell that to the Polar Bears, they can't read or plug in a laptop, but they sure can drown real good and recall were there was plenty of ice and now there is none!
Checkout who made and funded climategate; corporations are putting their children on the street corner,
hoping you and I will not see how much they are gang rapeing the earth mother
3 weeks before Mis-giving day and it's 70 degrees in NYC, go figure!
some articles
http://www.garynull.com/home/category/global-warming
--I said global warming is real, climate change is real too, but man's pollutions being the cause of all of this, no.
--Gary Null has exposed a lot of things, I've seen a lot of his stuff, but just as I've watched Democracy Now for years and don't agree with their take on Global Warming/Climate Change, I don't agree with his (if that which is on the website is his view).
--I know there is an abundance of man-made pollution in the atmosphere, which is of course having some type of effect, but ....
--Al Gore's documentary:
An Inconvenient Truth (2006)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0497116/
Al Gore
Was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, sharing the prize with the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Had he been the actual recipient of an Academy Award for the documentary An Inconvenient Truth (2006) in which he starred, he would have become the first person other than George Bernard Shaw to win both a Nobel Prize and an Oscar. [2007]
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0330722/bio
Many people were in disbelief at his win, and they had reason to be. This documentary wasn't even packed with knowledge. If you listen closley, you will hear "untrues" and "unfoundeds" alongside visual and audio that is designed to attack certain emotions and beliefs.
Nobel Peace Prize? Sounds "Barrackish" (Barrack winning the nobel peace prize for war). Wins like his and Barrack's show that very power people, those above governments, are trying to accomplish something.
Compare his documentary to one's I posted.
--Talking about Monsanto's RBGH, the reporter in this clip (portion of the documentary
The Corporation) states how she: "didn't realize how effectively a corporation could work to get something on the marketplace ... the levels of coordination they had to have ... they had to get university professors into the fold, they had to get experts into the fold, they had to get reporters into the fold, they had to get the public into the fold, and of course the FDA, let's not leave them out."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agh2Ubunxu4
Here, in this case, of a hormone being injecting into cows, one corporation was able to get university professors, experts, reporters, the federal regulators, and the public. And it was done. And this sort of thing is always done. So, to think that widely shared beliefs with accompanied "evidence" cannot be a fraud/lie/conspiracy because so many people believe, and so many important people say so, including experts, is to think wrong.
--Corporations have always done this. Corporations have more power that the US government (they pay them, and later employ them). All these decades of extreme protest against their polluting; all these decades of the government allowing them to pollute for brides; and now all of a sudden the government is punishing them?