Violaters / Violations : The Queen Enki thread

Discussion in 'Violators and Violations (Possible Ones)' started by Perfection, Jun 17, 2016.

  1. Perfection

    Perfection Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,464
    Likes Received:
    495
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +1,015
    I was just giving a notice that I violated a rule for mentioning a member's name in the thread, thus effectively shutting down the research I was about to demonstrate. Or, the message was sent to me that I cannot post in the thread "Enki was a Black Queen of the Ancient World" which I created.

    Please tell me Honorable Queen Destee that there was an error.

    So if I want to demonstrate (positive) research which shows the historical significance of names, I am prohibited from doing so if a member just so happens to be wearing those names?

    Enki was a Black Queen of the Ancient World (thousands of years ago) which means that her name and her presence was here before anyone here in the 21st century ever thought of using her name for an avatar...let me show the people.

    I shouldn't be punished because people don't know their history.
     
  2. Enki

    Enki The Evolved Amphibian STAFF

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2010
    Messages:
    8,153
    Likes Received:
    4,926
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Civil Eng.
    Location:
    The Third Plane of Existence
    Ratings:
    +5,928
    Sista Destee didn't do it, I did. The rule is clear on this for obvious reason. I have no problem with your opinion, I think you like the attention. I even joust with you from time to time just to switch up. But this rule applies to all, not just you.

    So please, refrain from putting members names in the title of your threads...

    Peace!
     
    • Thank You Thank You x 1
    • List
  3. Perfection

    Perfection Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,464
    Likes Received:
    495
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +1,015
    His actions remind us of a dirty cop planting fabricated evidence on innocent black people using his badge to put black people in jail or kill them. This moderator is essentially saying: "In the name of Destee (his badge) you will no longer elevate Black Women."

    And while I don't know her personally, I'mma guess I know her enough to know there is no way Queen Destee supports that.

    This is a personal attack on Black Women and her knowing her true history. Remember I showed you what Dr. Barashango said. He said there will be brothas who will be uncomfortable with the "resurgence" regarding the knowledge of the magnificence of the Black Woman. He said these brothas will be insecure. He said:

    Unfortunately, some brothers may be a little less than comfortable with the resurgence of this knowledge. Nevertheless, I suggest an awakening to the historical reality---that all available scientific evidence reveals---that it was the Black Woman who first came to the understanding of and implemented the principles of civilization should not in any way cause the Black Man to feel the need to indulge the machoism of male chauvinistic insecurities." ---quote from pages 2 and 3 from Ishakamusa Barashango's Afrikan Woman the Original Guardian Angel. (bold is mine).

    What we are witnessing here is a microcosm of what's going on in the society: Certain insecure black men not wanting Black Women to be elevated. Keep her at the average button.

    I can also show you how certain black men of the Ancient World, just like today, took over the temples of Black Women and called them their own. They stole from Black Women. Herodotus did it. He stole from the Sybils.

    It's the same file we have in front of us now: a black man taking what's not his and not wanting Black Women, and the people in general, to know the truth about a Queen who has walked the Earth more than 5,000 years before he was born.

    May I draw the peoples' attention to October 15, 2013. On that date, I opened a room entitled Monikers of Queen Angela:

    https://destee.com/threads/monikers-of-queen-angela.78126/

    You will see in that room that I begin the analysis of tracing the moniker "Angela" from the root "Angel" and I was about to get deeper. I was using etymology to defend the moniker.

    "Angela" goes back as far as the 14th century. So you mean to tell us, that because there is a member with that name I can't talk about it (history) even though the name precedes the member by hundreds of years? C'mon now, be forreal.

    So I guess it will be said it was an oversight that I wasn't given a warning then and the fact that even at this moment the room has not be disabled for postings.

    Again, this attack is personal.

    May I draw the peoples' attention to May 3, 2013. On that date, I opened a room entitled: The Truth About Rapunzal:

    https://destee.com/threads/the-truth-about-rapunzel.75811/#post-799792

    There I wrote:

    Rapunzel was indeed a beautiful Black Woman. So beautiful that one 19th Century writer describes her as, "The most beautiful and beloved of all the Goddesses." (Hélène Adeline Guerber in Myths of Northern Lands).

    So because a member goes by Rapunzal, I can't bring out positive historical data which precedes the member by thousands of years?

    But it gets better. Not only did members participate in the Rapunzal room, but the Queen of the House, the Honorable Queen Destee, posted this:

    i always loved the rapunzel story ... it had to be my most favorite as a little girl

    it's so nice to read your account ... including little black girls like me into it ... making it ours

    you should write a book ... with like content ... for this absolutely touched the little black girl in me

    beautiful ... thanks for sharing (post #5)

    No notice of a violation then...room still opened for posting.

    This is a personal attack. A clear case of a dirty cop planting fabricated evidence.

    So Jesus can't be talked about, nor the monikers Sarah, Allah, Flower, Justice etc...because a member may have those names? And we not gone even talk about how these ain't their real names, but stage names :lol:

    Certain individuals who follow and unjustly criticize my work have been saying for years--moaning and complaining--about how I don't present enough evidence and what I say is opinion and not fact. Right? But when I get on the mark and set and be ready to go with the evidence, they call off the race and say basically "Naw, I don't want to hear your evidence." So they start planting fabricated evidence to get me banned (quasi-like). Meaning, it's basically banning me by saying I can't speak the truth about the Black Woman's intelligence, her beauty and her sophistication.

    Again, this is an attack against Black Women.

    Think about this yall. And I'm speaking to those who are reasonable here. Imagine if a white man was a member here. And he used as his avatar the name "Hannibal." Then, just so happen I have evidence and research about Hannibal.

    Let's further assume I then proceed to open a room entitled "Hannibal was a Black Warrior King." So we are expected to understand that we are in violation of a rule which prohibits me from presenting the evidence? To prevent me from telling the truth? To prevent you, the people, from knowing the truth? Why? Because a white member has as his avatar the name "Hannibal" and so another member can't show historical research of that persona because its "personal"? Even though the persona Hannibal precedes the member by thousands of years?

    What sense does that make?

    There is no way in the world Queen Destee supports this move. It's personally motivated, illogical and designed to silence truth about Black Women.

    Again, we can't be responsible if certain members are ahistorical while the rest of us are well-versed in the knowledge of history in general, and about Black Women in particular.

    There is no way Queen Destee supports this move.
     
    • Disrespectful Disrespectful x 1
    • List
  4. MS234

    MS234 Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    4,063
    Likes Received:
    3,380
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +3,900
    U act like a little kid. U know u not supposed to put names in the title a destee rule. U did it mock him. Novbody has a problem elevating so called black women, it's u. U r the problem. Nobody likes how u move how u twist words around u could have presented ur evidence in ur first post but instead u chose to play games so enki showed u he can play too lol we love and elevate our women its u we dont care for lol smh
     
  5. UBNaturally

    UBNaturally Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2014
    Messages:
    6,497
    Likes Received:
    1,017
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +1,736
    Was about to get out the popcorn to read this soon to be "enlightening" information.

    :popcorn3:
     
  6. Perfection

    Perfection Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,464
    Likes Received:
    495
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +1,015
    And so was a lot of people (the numbers were adding quickly) including Hermetic and even the moderator (who shut the room down) had his popcorn saying something to the effect that he only had "enough popcorn for one person." He said that to Hermetic. He was the second poster liking the subject matter and agreeing with the first poster:

    hatah.png

    But see, he deleted his own comment before yall woke up and saw it and, like a dirty cop about to get caught, he got sloppy and forgot to "unrate" Hermetic's post.

    Again, his actions are similar to those of a dirty cop hiding stuff and planting fabricated evidence against black people.

    It's personal.
     
    • Disrespectful Disrespectful x 1
    • List
  7. Enki

    Enki The Evolved Amphibian STAFF

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2010
    Messages:
    8,153
    Likes Received:
    4,926
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Civil Eng.
    Location:
    The Third Plane of Existence
    Ratings:
    +5,928

    You've been here long enough to know there are rules, did you ever read them? Here let me post the one you violated.

    Rule #5 - No Member's Names in Titles
    Putting member's names in titles, often personalizes the discussions, which is a rule violaton (#6 below).

    The exception to this is wishing someone happy birthday, or something such as that.

    Do Not Put Members Names in Thread Titles


    Now this is the warning you are rightfully due.


    Warning
    , you are in violation of

    Rule #2 - No Name Calling
    It is best to refer to members by the name they registered as, or risk being in violation.


    Members on here are not "dirty cops"....



    And.....

    Rule #6 - No Personalizing Discussions

    You can't make the discussion about a Member.

    This includes speaking on your perception of another's intellect, or lack thereof.

    Keep your commentary on the topic, not on a Member.

    I do have a vocabulary...ahistorical means ignorant of history. You can't call members ignorant.

    Now you have been warned. Adhere to the rules and just accept that you can't put members names in your thread title....


    Peace!
     
    Last edited: Jun 19, 2016
  8. Perfection

    Perfection Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,464
    Likes Received:
    495
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +1,015
    See yall...they taking it to another level. They saying I can't even use the word "ahistorical" to describe someone :lol:.

    What did we say earlier...there's was a conspiracy to get me banned but it had to be done through the backdoor because I don't break rules:lol: I only elevate Black Women...which, I suppose, is breaking the rules:lol:

    I already showed you all that even Queen Destee participated in one of the rooms I did research on, right? She didn't say anything about the rules...she even thanked me for the post and encouraged me to write a book.:lol:

    But it's all good.

    The price I have to pay because I'm so good at expressing the Black Woman's beauty, her intelligence and her sophistication.

    I'm so good at it, so skilled--surgical--,-with no one in modern history to even come close-- it's an honor I'm being banned because of it. :yaay:That means what I had been saying for years is true: The Black Woman is the greatest woman on the planet.

    And I thank you Black Women here--even Destee, the Honorable Queen Destee, for giving me the opportunity to demonstrate my work not only in this print form but also when she invited me to do the 2 hour interview on The Perfection of Black Women.

    Overall, my experience here has been a 10 out of 10 and I would recommend this site to others.

    Thank you all...and I wish love and light to you :grouphug:
     
  9. MS234

    MS234 Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    4,063
    Likes Received:
    3,380
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +3,900
    I'm glad you can laugh because everyone was laughing at you. You sound foolish and immature.

    You could probably start the thread again without enki in the title present your evidence and be done with it. Simple.

    lol yea you're surgical at making assumptions. I agree no one in history can come close to your BS.

    If you're so skilled start the thread again like i said state your evidence in the first post. Let's see you post your evidence. Don't worry I'm being rhetorical. Everybody knows you won't because you don't post evidence you post opinions.

    Everybody sees your game. It has nothing to do with "black" women and all to do with you.

    I've asked you several times what did the first women call themselves because they didn't speak english or call themselves "black".

    What did they refer to themselves as, do you even know?
     
  10. Hermetic

    Hermetic going above and beyond PREMIUM MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    May 30, 2015
    Messages:
    264
    Likes Received:
    73
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +233
    Perfection

    The act of research is not what you seem to think it is. When you conduct research, you actually have to include your sources. That seems to be something you are unwilling or unable to do.
     
Loading...