Law Forum : THE LEGALIZATION OF POT

ogoun

Well-Known Member
MEMBER
If this dandruff starts making a snowman my poor computer is going to suffer and it'll look pretty silly sit'n there with a big hole blown through it.

Maybe, just maybe I got the pm thing straightened out, dunt know I haven't touched it since the last pm I got so's what could've happened is beyond me. I must've punched some button wrong. Maybe it still punched wrong for all I know.
Let's find out.
 

Kemetstry

going above and beyond
PREMIUM MEMBER
I would if the link would work for me. doh
So provide a link that works and I'll be glad to read it.

However, whatever it says though if it includes realfarmcy I doubt I'd take it to the bank. Particularly after doing a search on realfarmcy and the first 5 or 6 hit listings come up with reviews that say fake news, compares it to satire and suggest it's pages offer some of the worst health advice given.
Now, so far as peer review goes when speaking about a web site with such 'good' ratings who do they choose as their peers? The believers that the human race was created from interbreeding with a race of alien reptilian interlopers? Or Southern Baptist snake handlers? Climate change deniers? Part of the L Ron Hubbard cadre?
Ya see, peer review means squat if what is called a peer review is carefully targeted. It all depends on 'the who' one considers ones peers are.

Oh and by the way, for your head shakes.
I hear a bit of bud helps with treating the early onset Parkinson's.

Or, you could try actually googling the subject



.
 

ogoun

Well-Known Member
MEMBER
I did that days ago.

My question is, instead of positing from some sketchy news site, why didn't you?
 

Kemetstry

going above and beyond
PREMIUM MEMBER
I did that days ago.

My question is, instead of positing from some sketchy news site, why didn't you?


Because I didn't feel it was sketchy. Moreover, it wasn't the subject of the thread



.
 

ogoun

Well-Known Member
MEMBER
If you're posting something (anything) that claims to be FACT then 'it' certainly is on topic. When you post something from a conspiracy-pseudoscience news source, then whatever 'it is' is certainly on topic. When you make yourself the arbiter for what qualifies as good information, then any of that info as well as your qualifications for making any judgement/s in arriving at that those decisions is on topic.
At least twice I have asked you post a usable link to that article so I could read what it has to say or if not that, then to spill a little ink and relate what it purports. Zippo, nada, nothing from you but snide bs. And likewise when earlier in the thread I asked about any studies done within the Rastafarian communities. Nothing but snide brush-offs and yet more bs. In fact throughout this entire thread between ducking honest questioning all you have done is post sketchy bs and moralized to no end towards one and all.
So don't (yet again) try to give us any of that lame 'off topic' excuse as an attempted deflection.
 

Kemetstry

going above and beyond
PREMIUM MEMBER
If you're posting something (anything) that claims to be FACT then 'it' certainly is on topic. When you post something from a conspiracy-pseudoscience news source, then whatever 'it is' is certainly on topic. When you make yourself the arbiter for what qualifies as good information, then any of that info as well as your qualifications for making any judgement/s in arriving at that those decisions is on topic.
At least twice I have asked you post a usable link to that article so I could read what it has to say or if not that, then to spill a little ink and relate what it purports. Zippo, nada, nothing from you but snide bs. And likewise when earlier in the thread I asked about any studies done within the Rastafarian communities. Nothing but snide brush-offs and yet more bs. In fact throughout this entire thread between ducking honest questioning all you have done is post sketchy bs and moralized to no end towards one and all.
So don't (yet again) try to give us any of that lame 'off topic' excuse as an attempted deflection.


Just because it wasn't to your satisfaction, does not disprove it.



.
 

ogoun

Well-Known Member
MEMBER
Uh huh, about what I expected from you.
Don't let anyone ever accuse you of doing any of that nasty over thinking stuff or put up with being called a man of letters.

As you STILL either haven't found the ways or means to share what realfarmcy says (because I still don't know. Gee thax keme) this is what a couple of google hits say:
https://www.trulieve.com/blog/scientist-reveal-what-cannabis-does-to-your-bones

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19634029

Weather or not they agree with the realfarmacy site I have no idea as kemetstry has been so spare in words if not in thought.
 

Kemetstry

going above and beyond
PREMIUM MEMBER
kemetstry, that response comes close to showing illiteracy in reading comprehension and writing skills.

We agree to disagree. Glad you finally got off your @** and looked it up though



.
 
Top