They’re still going at it. They know they still have people out there who believe their first lies, and they’re using this to enrage them further. Just listen to how they word this, still trying to make it sound like it’s close to the narrative/lies they first put out; and look at the scenes they use, the scenes they used to first push their narrative.
*
And then they bring Glen on to “help us understand all of this.” FYI: We don’t know if they are victims, which is a word that makes them sound innocent, but we know for a fact they were rioters and arsonists; it’s in the videos. But looters, I don’t know. And still, that’s the judge, not the evidence. The evidence, the full, unedited videos clearly show Rittenhouse was acting in self-defense, and the “victims” were attackers. And how do we know this judge wasn’t planted there to be bias in order to make it seem like an injustice when Kyle gets off?
*
They have this guy come on as “the expert,” refer to the attackers as victims, put out a narrative that the judge is trying to rig the case, and says based on his expert opinion Rittenhouse will be found guilty. So, when he’s found innocent… And the people who still believe the narrative are already being affected by this. It’s racist. It’s white privilege.
Yeh, that vigilante Kyle is a hero!
We should reward him...............with room and board for 30 years to life.