Black People : The Iceman Inheritance A frightening publication history of Jewish media suppression

Discussion in 'Black People Open Forum' started by Keita Kenyatta, Feb 14, 2012.

  1. Keita Kenyatta

    Keita Kenyatta going above and beyond PREMIUM MEMBER

    Feb 7, 2004
    Likes Received:
    Ironically enough, The Iceman Inheritance was very favourably received after its initial Canadian publication in December 1978.
    Dr. Judith Posner, an anthropology professor at Toronto’s York University, had written in her Introduction: “The Iceman Inheritance is a worthy model to keep in mind when reviewing the long range of human history, and especially when looking into the future.” Several other anthropologists, sociologists and historians were equally encouraging. All agreed that the argument of The Iceman Inheritance was well worth an airing and objective assessment.
    The book was immediately excerpted by three major Canadian daily newspapers: the Globe and Mail (Toronto, 2 pages), The Calgary Herald (1 page) and the Ottawa Journal (1 page). About twenty U.S. newspapers also excerpted it, or else wrote long and generally very favourable reviews. The book was seen as a new and valuable insight into the pattern of human history.
    There were some experts who disagreed with the theory, of course, but two observations were hard to shrug off. First, every single modern political boundary on earth has been drawn or dictated by Caucasians. Second, I provided an anthropological map of “the Iceman’s inheritance” which showed the inexorable Caucasian expansion from 100,000 years ago to now. This made a good TV graphic.

    I was interviewed by Tom Snyder on NBC’s coast-to-coast “Tomorrow” television talk show (the other guest was Bill Cosby) while the book was being promoted at the annual Convention of the American Anthropological Association held in Los Angeles in 1979. I was invited to give a multi-part presentation to the Princeton University Institute for Advanced Study (Symposium on Alternative Futures). This was covered by CBC Radio’s prestigious “Ideas” series.
    A major North American publisher, Warner Books (later Times-Warner), bought the mass-market paperback rights in late 1979 and quickly put out an edition that sold 40,000 copies in the first two weeks.
    Then, in early 1981, someone figured out the implications for Jews in the book’s presentation of evidence…
    I had never considered this myself because it had been a long time since I had taken my own Jewish origins into any account. I had never even thought about any “Jewish implications” of the book. Neither did the Jewish publisher of the original Canadian edition, Larry Goldstein. And, obviously, Dr. Judith Posner had not thought about any “Jewish implications” either when she wrote an Introduction for The Iceman Inheritance – unless, of course, courageous Judy Posner simply had more affinity with all of humanity than with her own ethnic group. Jews were blandly mentioned on half a page in the 226-page book.
    After 1981, some bookstores that had formerly carried the book were threatened with boycott and fire-bombing by Jewish pressure groups.
    Warnings by Jewish anthropologists and complaints by Jewish pressure groups caused Warner Books to drop the book almost instantly, in breach of contract. But my rights to find another publisher were not immediately returned to me as is usually the case in such situations and is also the normal industry practice. Warner Books wanted to co-operate in the strategy of making The Iceman Inheritance totally unavailable to buyers and readers.
    Two speaking tours by the author were cancelled because the organizers could not guarantee my safety in view of threats of violence by the Jewish Defence League. The seriousness of the situation was demonstrated when a Mier Kahane-inspired extremist tried to stab me on the podium at Kennedy-King College in Chicago
    To add insult to near-injury, I found that although The Iceman Inheritance was sufficiently provocative for the Jewish media mafia to suppress it... and also to steal it for profit when convenient... I was not to earn income from it.

    Because of the 1979 anthropological convention in Los Angeles and my appearance on NBC’s “Tomorrow” show with interviewer Tom Snyder and co-guest Bill Cosby (and many other U.S. radio and TV shows), two LA screenwriters heard of the theory. They were inspired to write a movie script called “The Iceman” about a frozen Neanderthal who, on being thawed out by scientists, exhibited aggression and identity problems in the dimension of time. The two writers wrote me a letter in 1981, thanking me not only for their inspiration, but also for the book’s technical anthropology data they were able to include in their screenplay.
    I learned completely by accident a few months later that Canadian producer-director Norman Jewison had acquired this screenplay and planned to produce “The Iceman” in 1983 at a cost of $11-million. At the time, I was otherwise engaged in the Caribbean trying to help, mostly with my own money and some government assistance, impoverished people in the Third World. I was making inexpensive fishing boats and electricity-producing windmills with the help of the Canadian International Development Agency... see the many articles and Hot Air and Ancient Wonders on this Site.
    Although Canadians swear by Jewison’s so-called “integrity” and his encouragement of Canadian creators, none of this applied to me when I appealed politely in several letters to these noble qualities supposedly possessed by Norman Jewison. And when this didn’t work, I didn’t have enough time or money to fight Jewison’s expensive LA lawyers effectively.
    The upshot was that Jewison made the film, released in 1983, but I received no money and not even a screen credit for supplying the entire theme (not the plot, thankfully) of Jewison’s “The Iceman” and supplying most of its research.
    Banned by Jewish social and financial influence in all the so-called “mainstream” (i.e. “white”) American educational institutions, The Iceman Inheritance was partly suppressed and also, of course, no major publisher would touch it because of both legal complications and Jewish opposition.
    But because of the stir caused by the approximately 200,000 Warner Books paperbacks that had been sold by 1981, the public’s growing demand for the book was much greater than the supply. This encouraged the production of at least four pirate editions based on Xerox copies of the Warner Books paperback and one pirate edition based on the original Canadian hardcover. These pirated editions dominated the market for a decade while I focused on Third World aid and development projects.
    Finally, because of the embarrassment caused by these editions (Warner Books’ logo had naturally been Xeroxed along with the text), when the New York Times and Warner Books merged to become Times-Warner, they wrote me a letter saying that they had “no interest” in the book. They denied that they had ever held rights to it and also denied that they had ever even published it!

    The Warner Books logo had been counterfeited by the pirate publishers, they claimed. Chivalrous, those pirates. But this denial of publication was technically correct, although it was a misleading legalism and a distortion of the common-sense truth. Times-Warner had not published The Iceman Inheritance, Warner Books had published it before the merger. Cute, eh?
    In spite of this treatment by a Jewish-owned media giant and the Jewish-edited New York Times, I had nonetheless found the time to do some undercover work for the B’nai Brith over these years. I became concerned about “neo-Nazi” groups that were supposedly operating under the guise of “Odinists” – believers in the old Teutonic god, Odin.

    I had completely by chance stumbled on evidence that these Odinists had possibly killed at least one Jewish woman executive in Toronto (and possibly two others). These deaths had been judged as suicides by the Toronto police. But I investigated the circumstances of these deaths out of my own dangerous sense of curiosity (like the research leading to The Iceman Inheritance). One of the victims had been a friend of mine. I managed to get that case re-opened again as a possible homicide and to have investigations into the two other deaths re-opened as well.
    These same Odinists in Toronto, I was able to tell the B’nai Brith, were very possibly sending arms to groups in South America and also apparently producing and selling underground “snuff movies” in order to pay for weapons. Snuff movies are films that feature an actual and usually prolonged torture-killing, in this case the victims were mostly Caribbean and South American native girls.
    Because of my aid projects, contacts and travels to non-touristy destinations in the Caribbean and Central America, the B’nai Brith and the Toronto police asked me to go underground, using my established cover as a Third World development expert (but one with kinky tastes), and to penetrate the Odinist network. I did this from 1981 until 1983, often at considerable risk, reporting directly to Toronto Police Chief, John Wesley “Jack” Ackroyd.
    I wrote a novel based on this experience called The Valhalla Victims (1983), but withdrew it from submission to publishers at the request of the B’nai Brith. It documented some actual “neo-Nazi” networks much too well and both the B’nai Brith and Israel’s secret service, “the Mossad (I was told)”, were afraid that the novel would push these groups even deeper underground.
    At that time, there were still some major North American publishers that were not Jewish owned or controlled and I had two book offers for the novel and one film offer. But I complied with the B’nai Brith request. I received a letter of commendation for my undercover research and for not publishing the novel.

    With the publication rights of The Iceman Inheritance freed up by the Times-Warner merger, Lushena-Kayode Books, a small New York Afro-American publisher, finally did put out a legal and legitimate edition in 1991. But Lushena-Kayode Books could only afford to print a limited number of copies. Besides that, Lushena-Kayode’s edition was 40% defective and I was never paid royalties on any of the print runs. The owner fled to Trinidad at one point where he continues to publish and sell his now-illegal pirate edition over the Internet.
    This 1981-1991 decade of playing legalisms with the media mafia had not only cost me a great deal of income in royalties lost to pirated editions, but the frequent Jewish telephone threats to maim or murder me between 1981-1991 caused stress that has affected my health.
    Because of the Lushena-Kayode edition of 1991, The Iceman Inheritance started making news again. I was invited to give lectures at Vanderbilt, Yale, Kennedy-King College (again) and many other American universities and colleges – and the tempo of Jewish threats also increased. But some organizers were so incensed at Jewish terrorist tactics that they were willing to pay for beefed-up security. Dr. Len Jeffries began using The Iceman Inheritance at the City College of New York.
    All seven top editors of the New York Times were Jewish in 1991 and they hoped to bury Dr. Jeffries with a media campaign of libel and misrepresentation that started on July 20, 1991. This eventually cost the New York Times some $400,000 in damages.
    Exactly a year later, the New York Times took aim at me and The Iceman Inheritance with a full-page editorial on July 20, 1992 – the now famous (or infamous) “Demagogues and Pseudo- Scholars” – that included not only misquotes, but purely imaginary quotes from The Iceman Inheritance.
    Now, it is true that almost every prominent and progressive Afro-American professor was swiped at in this article, but it is also true that most of them were using The Iceman Inheritance in their classes. My claim that “Demagogues and Pseudo-Scholars” was aimed primarily at me and the book is borne out by the fact that of all those mentioned in the full-page editorial, only I was invited to write a rebuttal reply.
    This reply was duly published several weeks later next to a letter by President Marcos of the Philippines. I have not yet looked up the date of my published reply in my disorganized files, but it should not be hard for any serious researcher to discover.
    I still remember how stunned and hurt I was at the time (July 1992) because of the sudden about-face in a major newspaper’s public editorial judgement of the book and because of the sheer viciousness of the New York Times editorial.
    Even after Times-Warner’s treatment of me, and the axe-job on Jeffries, I still could not believe that the respected New York Times would stoop to printing false “quotes” from a published book. It would be too easy to check... if any “journalist” with integrity bothered to check, that is. But maybe few journalists, and even fewer Jewish ones, can claim any integrity.
    I decided not to expend any money in seeking legal redress, as Dr. Len Jeffries had done. First of all, I did not have the income and security afforded by Jeffries’ CCNY tenure and, being a Caucasian myself, I lacked Len Jeffries’ Afro-American support and personal protection infrastructure. Besides, I was devoting all my resources to the development of a new inter-island trading vessel intended for Caricom (the so-called “Caribbean Common Market”).
    Many Jewish editors in other North American daily newspapers duly followed the New York Times’ unwritten “ethnic” directive of not referring to The Iceman Inheritance ever again and pretending that it didn’t exist.
    Since July 20,1992, not even Canadian newspapers have mentioned this best selling Canadian-authored book. It had been reliably estimated that The Iceman Inheritance has sold more copies than any other Canadian-authored book except for Anne of Green Gables and (arguably) Farley Mowat’s Sibir. This Canadian silence shows just how deep Jewish influence is in North American media, and it also demonstrates the danger to democratic freedom of speech that this inordinate influence represents.
    About 35% to 40% of all reporters and editors in North American newspapers are Jewish, and an even higher percentage of producers, story editors and script writers in electronic media are Jewish. All major media in the United States, including newspapers, publishers and movie production, is financially controlled by Jews when it is not actually Jewish-owned. The same is true in Canada.
    That is why you see so much pro-Jewish, pro-Israeli and anti-Arab propaganda in Hollywood’s so-called “harmless entertainment” – from early summer’s The Return of the Mummy (May 2001) to Leslie Nielsen’s just-released Wrongfully Accused (August 2001). A few years ago, Independence Day was a blatant example of pro-Jewish propaganda and there are too many more Hollywood films that imbed both blatant and subtle pro-Jewish and pro-Israeli bias in the “entertainment.” This includes all of Mel Brooks’ films, for example.
    Almost all North American network TV newscasters and analyst-commentators are Jewish, which is why the 2000 American presidential election was almost hijacked for Gore-Lieberman. These newscasters, led by CNN, agreed to announce what they knew to be fraudulent “returns” when network television coverage began at 7:00 PM Eastern time. At 7:03 they all announced that Gore-Lieberman had carried crucial Florida – while the polls were still open in the western part of the state in the Central Time Zone. Western Florida’s “panhandle” was acknowledged Bush turf.

    Many Bush supporters, hearing incorrectly from all major media sources that their candidate had already lost, didn’t bother to vote. In the subsequent Senate investigations of the media’s election coverage in February-March 2001, it transpired that this so-called “mistake” had cost Bush 40,000 votes. But at the time, in the 37-day aftermath of legal struggles for the presidency during most of November and into early December 2000, the media only once mentioned this attempt to manipulate the Florida vote. All major networks instead gave incessant coverage about the “butterfly ballot” in heavily Jewish West Palm Beach County.
    However… testimony given to the Senate’s investigation of the media’s election coverage during February and March 2001 established that this “butterfly ballot” had been purposefully planted to focus media attention on a heavily Jewish county if, after all, the Florida vote turned out to be close in spite of the media’s “mistake”. Three former Clinton aides also testified to the Senate that several network newscasters pestered outgoing Bill Clinton for presidential pardons during the last days of the Clinton-Gore Administration.
    Media buried these admissions on back pages when they were mentioned in print at all. No network television news or public affairs program ever even mentioned these pleas for presidential pardons by their own newscasters.
    There is much more to this attempted Election 2000 coup d’état – for that is exactly what it was – in the United States by Jews, the media and Israel. Thanks to some Afro-American contacts in the offices of the National Security Advisor and State Department, I have heard rumors about how and why the Gore-Lieberman ticket really backed down. Votes and recounts had little to do with it.
    But enough has been said to show that inordinate Jewish control of media is obviously dangerous for democracy. And Jewish control of North American media is also why you will never see a recap of Israel’s creation, as informative background to Middle East violence, on American television.
    To get back to my own story and The Iceman Inheritance, I was shocked and hurt by the New York Times editorial of July 20, 1992, but I was also very puzzled. What had I written to cause all this insane anger?
    My original Canadian publisher, Larry Goldstein of Dorset Publishing Inc., was not only Jewish, but had served in the Negev on an Israeli kibbutz. Dr. Judy Posner was Jewish. Surely, they would have taken issue with any “anti-Semitic” content of The Iceman Inheritance long before it was published?
    The problem was really that I had always been woefully ignorant about true Jewish origins. And so were most North American Jews. Between 1979-1991, I had been wholly concentrating on development projects in Africa, the Caribbean, South America and Sri Lanka and had had time only to read mostly technical publications and reports. Like most people, I had always thought that “the Jews” had once lived in Palestine, had been expelled by the Romans about AD 70 in the “Diaspora” and had settled in various places, including Central and Eastern Europe.
    But spurred by the vicious and sometimes violent Jewish reaction to The Iceman Inheritance in 1992, I buckled down to do some serious research about episodes of human history that were a little more recent than the Middle and Upper Paleolithic. And I learned the surprising truth.
    Only 4.5% of Jews in the world, according to the Jewish Encyclopaedia (the first post-World War II, 1960 edition), could trace their ancestry back to the Holy Land and they are called “Sephardic” Jews from the Hebrew word for Spain, Sepharad. There are very few of them in the United States, but some live in the southern states bordering the Gulf of Mexico. That explained my own Jewish family heritage, which had always puzzled me. I learned, to my surprise, that my family was Sephardic from Louisiana.
    Many Sephardic Jews presently live in and around the Caribbean where they were the first “Spanish” and “Portuguese” conquistadors and colonists. My Jewish ancestors were thus responsible for the genocide of millions of American Indians and for starting the transatlantic slave trade in Black Africans. Other Sephardic Jews live in Spain, southern France, South America and South Africa.

    The other 95.5% of all “Jews” in the world come from Russian steppe tribesmen who converted to Judaism about 1300 years after the biblical scriptures had been written. They are called “Ashkenazi” Jews and they have no genetic ancestry among Abraham’s biblical Israelites at all.
    They were the prime so-called “Jewish” victims of Hitler’s so-called “Holocaust”. They constituted, from 1948, the vast majority of modern Israel’s population. For many of them who now reside in Israel, Florida, California or New York City, their first language is still Russian.
    These Ashkenazi “Jews” had immigrated massively into the United States between 1870 and 1920 and are the people that ordinary Americans know as “Jews”. Most of them settled in New York City originally. The largest Jewish newspaper in the U.S. is the Forward, published in New York City, and it still puts out an all-Russian edition. The Ashkenazi “Jews” then spread all over the country, and especially to Florida and California, and they are notable for creating Hollywood’s movie industry.
    When I had finally digested all this, which took about six months, the animal-like animosity of the New York Times editorial became crystal clear. The “Jewish” Ashkenazim had come from a region of known late-lingering Neanderthals, the Caucasus Mountains and the neighboring Russian steppes.
    Some typically “Jewish” physical traits were very obviously vestigial Neanderthal ones – generally a short stature and a plump physique, many very short wide-hipped and big- breasted women, extremely hairy men and a tendency toward beetling brows and large beaky “hooked” noses in both genders. Many Ashkenazim have crinkly-curly head hair tending toward dark reddish brown or mahogany in color.
    Among Ashkenazi “Jews” there is also a genetic tendency toward beaky faces, not only just noses, and big mouths (in more ways than one) that “wrap around” the lower face. Barbara Streisand and Julia Roberts provide two lovely and very well known examples of how attractive this genetic trait can be. But these are not “Semitic” physical traits. They are Neanderthal physical characteristics.
    And maybe some Neanderthal emotional and behavioral traits persisted among the Ashkenazim along with the physical ones.
    Their “chosen people” pretension is a typical Neanderthal in-group obsession that is actually a genetic racist predisposition against all other humans. It is a genetically determined “us against them” mentality. Their higher level of known Neanderthal aggression against outsiders is responsible for their disproportional social in

Users found this page by searching for:

  1. iceman inheritance theory