Greetings Keita,
Many thanks for the response and particularly, the clarification of certain points. Judging from my initial post, it is strikingly obvious that this elucidation was needed.
I realize that this thread has advanced since then but I thought it courteous to respond, with my personal thoughts, having taken some time to reflect on a few very valid points that you raised.
Given your extensive background in this field, it is natural that contention might arise in the views expressed in this forum; this is not a bad thing, and could provide a platform for a healthy debate because after all, no one possesses the monopoly on truth.
Additionally, if you were genuine in your determination to see this done “right” to quote your terminology, I would think you would be proactive and provide this guidance.
You state that the reception for this is lacking, but I beg to differ and would hasten to add that it is a crime to be silent when one should speak. I am certain you will be able comprehend the depth of this statement and hope that you will share your knowledge. An excellent starting point would be a contribution to this thread; what are your thoughts on the Higher Self?
My other point is; surely there must be some methodology of communication that allows for you to express your opposing views or displeasure without needing to resort to negative words? I say this following the vitriol you initially expressed at Metasaience’s post. There are many avenues that serve as effective vehicles to express ones self, that do not spread doubt, fear, and skepticism or anger - themselves tools that achieve that which you are speaking against.
I deeply resent being referred to as being part of a clique, and find the suggestion that there is a herd mentality at play here most insulting. I will use Metasaience as a point of reference. I have always enjoyed reading his contributions; the reasons being many; he seeks to teach consciousness (and indeed the conscious) and not convince intellects; he writes out of compassion, not out of ego. There is sincerity in his words and most importantly, in his intent and it is the reason I ask him questions because I know the value he attaches to his words and feelings to others.
However, after I have logged off and all is said and done, I remember the words of a Gnostic Master “I raise my eyes towards the stars that will come to my liberation; nevertheless, I always guide myself with my Star, which I carry within my Inner Self." There is not a soul here, who does not understand this.
I urge you to see this for the counter-productive exercise that it is, and instead of rejecting or ridiculing us; show a little tolerance and contribute for the sake of the people’s spiritual liberation.
Respectfully submitted,
Amazon1979
Many thanks for the response and particularly, the clarification of certain points. Judging from my initial post, it is strikingly obvious that this elucidation was needed.
I realize that this thread has advanced since then but I thought it courteous to respond, with my personal thoughts, having taken some time to reflect on a few very valid points that you raised.
Given your extensive background in this field, it is natural that contention might arise in the views expressed in this forum; this is not a bad thing, and could provide a platform for a healthy debate because after all, no one possesses the monopoly on truth.
Additionally, if you were genuine in your determination to see this done “right” to quote your terminology, I would think you would be proactive and provide this guidance.
You state that the reception for this is lacking, but I beg to differ and would hasten to add that it is a crime to be silent when one should speak. I am certain you will be able comprehend the depth of this statement and hope that you will share your knowledge. An excellent starting point would be a contribution to this thread; what are your thoughts on the Higher Self?
My other point is; surely there must be some methodology of communication that allows for you to express your opposing views or displeasure without needing to resort to negative words? I say this following the vitriol you initially expressed at Metasaience’s post. There are many avenues that serve as effective vehicles to express ones self, that do not spread doubt, fear, and skepticism or anger - themselves tools that achieve that which you are speaking against.
I deeply resent being referred to as being part of a clique, and find the suggestion that there is a herd mentality at play here most insulting. I will use Metasaience as a point of reference. I have always enjoyed reading his contributions; the reasons being many; he seeks to teach consciousness (and indeed the conscious) and not convince intellects; he writes out of compassion, not out of ego. There is sincerity in his words and most importantly, in his intent and it is the reason I ask him questions because I know the value he attaches to his words and feelings to others.
However, after I have logged off and all is said and done, I remember the words of a Gnostic Master “I raise my eyes towards the stars that will come to my liberation; nevertheless, I always guide myself with my Star, which I carry within my Inner Self." There is not a soul here, who does not understand this.
I urge you to see this for the counter-productive exercise that it is, and instead of rejecting or ridiculing us; show a little tolerance and contribute for the sake of the people’s spiritual liberation.
Respectfully submitted,
Amazon1979