Chevron Dove : The Evidence & Existence of A REAL SUPER STAR

Discussion in 'Chevron Dove' started by Chevron Dove, Apr 28, 2013.

  1. Chevron Dove

    Chevron Dove Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    6,080
    Likes Received:
    2,582
    Gender:
    Female
    Ratings:
    +2,730
    A PUBLICATION MADE PUBLIC again, after 60+ Years, But Why the Change?
    A Planetarium Version of THE STAR OF BETHLEHEM , Cont.
    .
    The Evidence& Existence of A REAL SUPER STAR [III]
    .
    .
    By the word of the LORD were the heavens made; and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth. He gathereth the waters of the sea together as an heap: he layeth up the depth in storehouses. Let all the earth fear the LORD: let all the inhabitants of the world stand in awe of him. For he spake, and it was done; he commanded, and it stood fast.​
    .
    Blessed is the nation whose God is the LORD: …​
    PSALMS 33: 6-9, 12.​
    .
    I do set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between me and the earth. GENESIS 9:13.​
    .
    .[​IMG]

    http://pandasthumb.org/images/wildflowers.jpg

    [​IMG]
    [U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff]http://teresainfortworth.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/over-the-rainbow.jpg[/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U]
    .
    This Texas planetarium show starts out with a quick introduction about the advent of THE STAR OF BETHLEHEM and its purpose, but throughout the film other events and false ideas are deceptively introduced that strikes against ancient records, concepts that have nothing to do with the science and historical accounts that revolve around the new star’s appearance. As the narration proceeds, certain stars are highlighted for their magnificence that as should be expected too, are actually brilliant SUPER STARS on their own merit but again, they have no connection to the records in regards to the description of the Star of Bethlehem. The narrators interject leading exclamations such as ‘the Royal Jupiter’ and ‘the brilliant Sirius’ of which draws attention to these stars but interestingly, the very star that would match not only ancient records but recent records as well, they totally ignore. So amazingly, in their efforts to hide history, they actually prove true history to those who can understand the deception. This new star would also be a unique and incredible Super Star for so many reasons but actually, its purpose was to mark the evidence and existence of the most genuine and real Super Star due to the very presence and miracle of our being, human beings. What known star can possibly match the presence of THE STAR PLANET EARTH and its inhabitants of human beings! In deed, the very purpose and written account of ‘the Star of Bethlehem’ directly relates to the preservation of our creation! But even though the science and history in regards to other moving stars such as, the planet Earth and the planet Jupiter and information in regards to the fixed star, Sirius, and certain other fixed stars contains an immense amount of records, however, their history goes way back in time prior to the advent of the Star of Bethlehem. Nevertheless, this film deceptively raises issues based on these older phenomena and then at the end of the film, they conclude that the Star of Bethlehem, could not possibly be ‘an astrological observation’. But one of the many tricks and turns of phrases in this film can be seen even in this particular phrase because, the records about the Star of Bethlehem never did have anything to do with ‘astrology’ in the first place!
    .
    According to the very definition of the word, ‘astrology’ this Texas film has deceptively attempted to reduce the entire subject down to something that even the very Bible vehemently speaks against and that would be ‘astrology’. At no time in the Bible was it ever concluded that the motion and movements of ‘the Star of Bethlehem’ correlated to ‘astrology’ or ‘that the star of Bethlehem’ affected the motions and movements of any human being whether it be the wise men or the birth and life of the Christ child’! What a trick. The star did not appear so that people could predict what the wise men or what Jesus was going to do based on the star’s movement! The records that give an account for this rare and astonishing astronomical event and the records about the human reaction to this wonder would be no different in comparison to the records made of the human reactions in what occurred as a result of ‘hurricane Katrina’, ‘the earthquake-tsunami of 2004 and 2011’, ‘the supernovae of July 4, AD 1054’ or even the more recent ‘Boston Marathon terrorist attack’. Some people may choose to use astrology to predict people’s movements after certain star events occur, but that would have nothing to do with astronomy, recording an actual event, and people’s reaction as a result of an event. The moon’s position in relation to our earth affects some phenomena such as low tides and high tides, and eclipses or some planetary activities do affect certain earth phenomena as well and have been studied in how they may relate to hurricanes, earthquakes, or tsunamis. But, there would be no astronomical findings in regards to the actions of a terrorist! Some ancient people believed that the Supernovae of AD 1054 or the Comet of AD 1066 was a signal and a mark that something was going to happen to their way of life but that would not be astronomy. It would be true that a new star activity marks time just the way our clocks mark time, the moon cycle marks time, and etc. and anyone can make predictions based upon stars. Nevertheless, neither astronomy nor astrology equal prophecy, they only deal with what has been made tangible.
    .
    Prophecies are not based on star movements but are solely based upon ‘the expressed will and purpose of an higher spiritual being in relation to future events’ and they can be proven to either have come to past or not. This Texas planetarium show, by great deception, has aimed to strike down true factual records of past and present, that prove the prophecy of the Star of Bethlehem has actually come to past. Cleverly, a narrator in the film describes an image of what the sky would look like in the dawn sky on April 17 as the planet Jupiter rises above the horizon first to be followed by two other planets, and he exclaims how extraordinarily unique it was for all three stars to be seen near the narrow moon. He said that it could be ‘a powerful harbinger of the birth of a king’ but then he goes on to describe other events in the months ahead as well. The problem though would be that this Texas show does not agree at all with the other substantial scientific and historical accounts of what occurred on April 17 in regards to the new star’s first appearance. So in addition to the many other false statements put forth about the day the Star of Bethlehem was recorded to appear, following will be a response to particular false statements made in this Texas show:
    .
    First, contrary to the image that the Texas show presented, there were other substantial accounts of which agree that on the first evening of the star’s appearance, it became apart of not only A TRIPLE CONJUNCTION, but also the three planets from the earth’s point of view were in close proximity of each other and they specifically became apart of a particular TRIANGULAR CONFIGURATION and by studying this TRIANGULATION, scientist were able to determine with accuracy that the three planets in this particular Triangular configuration formed a complete straight line! The most recent account was broadcasted and aired on television as a result of another planetary line up that happened in April 2002 and was also reported by scientist today that have admitted the only other time this planetary alignment has happened with the same exact and particular triangular configuration that involved the three particular planet arrangements happened 2000 years ago in Bethlehem-Judaea and matched the same records as in the past. Although there were other recent planetary alignments, the configuration was not what occurred in April 2002 and what occurred 2000 years ago over Bethlehem-Judaea. The grouping or, ‘Triangular Configurations’ that the Star of Bethlehem was reported to have made with the Earth and the two other visible planetary stars situated near the moon that was seen as such from the earth’s viewpoint would be a key factor yet, there was ABSOLUTELY NO MENTION OF THIS MAJOR CELESTIAL PLANETARY LINE UP event or particular grouping at all in the Texas show. The narrator described the three planetary stars rising on April 17 at dawn but the planets were NOT GROUPED TOGETHER:
    .
    *…It’s on the radio, in the newspapers and on TV: the planets are aligning! I can’t go anywhere lately without people approaching me about it. “Where should I look?” they ask. “Did I miss it?”​
    [U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff]http://science.nasa.gov/media/medialibrary/2002/04/23/24apr_relax_resources/mammana_med.jpg[/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U]
    .
    The second blunder put forth byway of the Texas production would be how it contrasted the Biblical records of the past about ‘the new star’s FIRST APPEARANCE IN RELATION TO OUR PLANET EARTH. This Texas version differs from other scientific reports and calculations of today in regards to the new star’s first appearance as well. According to the written account in the Bible, the star moved and eventually stood over the house in Bethlehem, so if this new star moved and eventually stood over the house, it could not have been at an angle near the horizon of the earth in Bethlehem of which was what the Texas show presented in its narration and in its image! The producers of this scientific historic film deceptively presents to us ‘a dawn sky’ and never clarify why they would use ‘a dawn sky’ instead of ‘an evening sky’ of which would be ‘the zero point’ that would relate to not only ‘Hebrew time’ but the very time the wise men would have clocked the star and marked its position when they first saw its appearance as THEY WERE IN THE EAST. They would have marked the star progressively and in relation to earth as it moved and eventually ‘stood over the house’. Just as the recent 2002 planetary alignment, the alignment and grouping of stars occurred at 6:00 P.M. on April 16 IN THE EVENING!--of which was April 17 Hebrew Time. Therefore, when the star moved and stood over the earth where the house was positioned, technically, the star positioned itself over the house at 6:00 P.M. just as it had done previously in the booth when the baby was laid in the manger [trough].
    .
    The star would have been at an 180 degree angle with our planet Earth and directly over the manger in Bethlehem-Judaea and later it would have been at an 180 degree angle over the house at 6:00 P.M. So that would mean that when the wise men first saw this star appear in the east, the star would not have been straight up over their heads but at an angle nearer to the horizon! Therefore, after they obviously realized that this new star was ‘a moving star’ that moved against the backdrop of the fixed constellations, it was for this reason that they eventually organized a caravan and followed it as they journeyed westwards until they were able to see this star, not at an angle near the horizon at 6:00 P.M. anymore, but directly overhead at 6:00 P.M.! However, the Texas show craftily Blasphemes the Bible records and related the Star of Bethlehem to the Earth’s horizon at dawn, but the very basis of their show was as a result of the Bible account! So instead of dealing with Hebrew time and scientific findings of even today, they completely veer from the Biblical script and give a description of THE FIRST APPEARANCE of the Star of Bethlehem on April 17 in A DAWN SKY which would be around 6:00 A.M., and at an angle, and just above the horizon from the supposed viewpoint of Bethlehem!
    .
    The third deception in the Texas film would be that the three planets described to be present on April 17 near the moon was Jupiter, Saturn, and Mercury, but this account completely differs from other scientific and recorded accounts in regards to the star’s first appearance. By other accounts, the three planets that formed a grouping and a triple configuration on the evening the new star first appeared was Jupiter, Saturn, and Mars.
    .
    In fact, other recent accounts have given much more detail in that although both of the planets Mercury and Venus were not apart of the viewable grouping that made the triangular configurations, they were however on the same plane and were apart of the planetary alignment on April 17 both in the past and present. Both of the planets Mercury and Venus were positioned on the other side of the sun and the planet earth was also apart of the alignment of which the sun became the center of this incredible phenomena. By the time the wise men reached the ‘zero point’ of this new star and the earth, it should be expected that the planetary alignment would not have held that complete alignment position. However just like the scientific methods of today, it should become a systematic process to be able to track this new star constantly and determine its positions amongst other stars after its first appearance was recognized and recorded:
    .
    The five brightest planets visible from Earth have lined up to form a spectacular celestial array that will not be seen again until 2040. From April 16 to May 18, 2002, Jupiter, Saturn, Mars, Venus, and Mercury will appear in the western sky, visible in the evening with the naked eye….​
    .
    …In the Middle East, this triangle will hang directly above Bethlehem. This triangular grouping occurred over Bethlehem on April 1, 2 B.C., …​
    [U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff]http://www.wisdomportal.com/PlanetaryAlignment.html[/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U]
    .
    *Note: even though scientist don’t explain, ‘April 1’ would mean ‘April 14’-lunar time.
    .
    The fourth difference of the Texas show in comparison to other scientific records and observations was in regards to THE MOON of which became another major key factor and reference point that marks the advent of the new star and its position in relation to the many other stars in the sky. In fact, the moon has always been a reference point to identify and distinguish the planetary stars [moving stars] and their positions in relation to other fixed stars. Star positions in times past have been able to be tracked and determined too, byway of studying and knowing moon phases in relation to the earth, the solar calendar cycle, and the planetary movements as well. On this wise, the narrator of the Texas show describes and produces an image of ‘A NARROW MOON’ [Crescent moon] on April 17, but this totally differs from other scientific accounts in that they have recorded ‘AN ALMOST FULL MOON’ at the time of the new star’s advent. An ‘almost full moon’ would be consistent with a lunar cycle in which the moon was full on April 14 but then waned [shrunk ] three days later by April 17, or it was ‘almost full’ or not yet full on the 17th and was waxing [growing] and headed to becoming a full moon a few nights later.
    .
    The fifth major discrepancy should prove to be an obvious and deliberate deception. The narrator of the Texas show describes a celestial event with much enthusiasm of how the ‘fast moving’ planet Jupiter passes by the planet Saturn three times and then he excitedly states that it was a conjunction that happened three times in one year as if to describe a rare star event of that same year when the three planets Jupiter, Saturn, and Mercury rose above the horizon on the 17th day in April. This false report was obviously presented, highlighted, and designed to shoot down and take the attention away from other obvious scientific findings and historical records about the first appearance of this new star. The major reason why this TRIPLE CONJUNCTION described would never match any valid records about the time of the new star’s appearance would be because the narrator described a triple conjunction that occurred over the period of about a year, but according to other accounts, THE ADVENT OF THE NEW STAR HAPPENED SWIFTLY AND IN ONE NIGHT! Furthermore, the triple conjunction that other reports described happened in the evening of April 17, occurred in one night! But more importantly, the Bible of which would be the very reason for the show produced by the planetarium, describes the new star’s appearance in one night! So if a Triple Conjunction would have been a significant aspect of the advent, then obviously it would be in relation to the star coming into orbit in one night! According to the Bible, the new star appeared to mark THE BIRTH OF A MALE BABY, right at the very time, the very hour, that the baby was born! Mary gave birth when the star moved into orbit in the sixth hour on April 17 [6:00 P.M., April 16th]!
    .
    The Sixth discrepancy and illusion in this Texas show would be revealed in the form of a contradiction. If as the show suggest that the advent of a new star would be more closely described as ‘a wandering star’, then why would they make the conclusion at the end of the scientific film that basically disproves the very idea? In essence the film suggest that ‘no one really knows or can ever prove when any planet first came into orbit in our solar system’, but in truth, ancient recordings of priest-scientist and even the records of star worshipers proves otherwise. There are no known ancient records of the planet Uranus although it can be seen with the naked eye within the same band of all of the other planets against the backdrop of fixed constellations. This should automatically reveal that, even by methods of calculations, it could possibly be proven when this planet first became apart of our solar system. Due to the use of the telescope in the A.D. 1700s it was stated that Uranus was first seen, but it had to also be reported later, that this planet was seen by others in the A.D. 1600s as well and with the naked eye, therefore, it would be no reason why the ancient observers could not have seen Uranus accept for the obvious reasons in that it had not come into orbit yet! The early Islamic and Chinese civilizations produced masters in astronomy and they kept detailed records of the star field during the Dark Ages. So this omission and unexplained area about PLANET ORIGINS with respect to our solar system gives the basis for further FALSE CONCLUSIONS of which the Texas show has used in the attempt to blot out scientific facts that have been recorded by mankind in ancient times with regards to the advent of the Star of Bethlehem. This production has taken the liberty to highlight ‘the Royal planet Jupiter’ to give an allusion that should any new star be considered it would lean towards the findings based upon Jupiter but at the end, they contradict this notion in order to strike down all ideas, and deliberately draw complete attention away from another star planet that fits the exact descriptions of a new star in those times.
    .
    So, after the producers of this Texas show have painstakingly laid out what they deem to be facts, they make their conclusions and dispel any notion of the Star of Bethlehem as being ‘a new star’. The producers of this planetarium show have based their conclusions upon that one year which was also BASED UPON THE REOCRDS OF JOSEPHUS who wrote in favor of the Romans and who was not even born at the time this phenomena was recorded to have happened. In fact, Josephus was born almost 35 years later after the event and after Jesus had been reportedly born, lived, spread his message throughout the region, and then was Crucified. Therefore just like today, Josephus had to depend upon research and previous records to base his findings all the while, he was privy to the Roman rulers. No matter, the Texas producers of this supposedly scientific production validated their findings based upon a lunar eclipse that was in relation to the death of Herod-the-Great due to the writings of Josephus to base their methods of determining the time the Star of Bethlehem appeared and thereby due to this basis, they concluded that it could not possibly be a literal celestial advent. The narrator stated thus:
    .
    “However, if we accept the literal biblical interpretation that the wise men actually saw and followed a visible star, then we can come to only one conclusion, there observation is NOT AN ASTROLOGICAL OBSERVATION but a miracle.”​
    .
    Nevertheless, if the Texas producers would have included other records from the Bible, which would be the very source of the subject, and if they would have considered other scientific recordings past and present in regards to events that also occurred around the lifetime of Josephus that could be dated, then the findings of the Texas production would have been different. The Bible also recorded a major TOTAL SOLAR ECLIPSE at the time of the Crucifixion. Based upon the age of Jesus at the time of the Crucifixion, he would have been 33 1/2 years old, and this could be applied to other later events that occurred in Jerusalem as well to confirm the correct dates and times of his birth and the new star as well. Now surely if scientist can go that far back in time and determine a lunar eclipse based upon a Passover to attempt to determine the death of Herod, then they could track a lunar cycle to prove or disprove, a total solar eclipse! In order for there to have been a total solar eclipse, there would have been ‘A NEW MOON’ [a Black Moon]. Surely if Josephus lived during the time of the destruction of the Jewish temple, he would have heard about the events that occurred around the time of that Total Solar Eclipse which would have been around the time of his birth. But because Josephus became a friend of the Roman court, his records about the Star of Bethlehem in relation to a lunar eclipse and Herod’s death should not have been the only basis for modern findings in order to prove or disprove the Biblical records without the consideration of other records that could have been checked with the application of scientific methods. If a lunar eclipse that has not been recorded in the Bible can be considered in a finding when the moon and sun come together to determine the death of Herod, then surely a solar eclipse that has been recorded in the Bible can be considered in a finding when the new moon and sun come together to determine the lifetime and death of Jesus that would also correlate to the actual time of the a new star that marked his birth.
    .
    Other significant historical events during those times, such as when the temple of the Jews was destroyed, have been able to be recorded and dated and are not solely based on Josephus’ records but the GOSPEL and by scientific dating methods as well. Therefore, even the birth and death of Jesus, or any event, or publication or etc. should be traceable by the same scientific methods. To rely upon a lunar eclipse that Josephus recorded to base a celestial event of a new star that was recorded by many in those times, which also occurred prior to Josephus’ life, without it being related to ANOTHER DEFINITE MARK such as in relation to the Solar Calendar would be a great deception. A lunar eclipse in regards to a religious event, such as Passover, or any event that could have been changed at anytime by Roman law would be the deception. Under the command of emperor Vespasian and Josephus’ later friend, the Roman emperor Titus, the Jews were viciously attacked! It was reported that about ONE MILLION JEWS were slaughtered in A.D. 66, and many of the remaining thousands were enslaved or driven out of the lands, a time of which Jesus’ friends, the disciples, also endured as well. However too, even though the Jews were attacked, the Herods remained in power until A.D. 92 and only after Herod Agrippa died, did the Romans take full control over Jerusalem [Palestine]. All of these events have been dated and correlate to our date system today! Therefore, it should become apparent that the conclusions made in regards to this Texas scientific production are totally wrong because they have based their findings on a false basis whether it was done intentionally or not. If the producers of this Texas scientific historic document would have considered other possible years for the advent of the Star of Bethlehem, in addition to Josephus’ report, and if they would have included other references, their conclusion would have been definitely different!
    .
    And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple. And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things: verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.​
    ST MATTHEW 24.1-2.​
    .
    Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children. … Then the soldiers of the governor took Jesus into the common hall, and gathered unto him the whole band of soldiers….​
    ST MATTHEW 27:25-27.​

    .[​IMG]
    THE TITUS ARCH OF TRIUMPH--Still stands
    today

    [U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff]http://www.dl.ket.org/latin3/historia/empire/images/titus_arch.jpg[/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U]

    *Note; It still stands today, built about ten years after the temple was destroyed & after *Masada.
    .
    Obviously if the year 6 B.C. did not have any celestial event that could match ancient Biblical and secular records like that of the Roman-Syrian coins and etc. then it would be because THE TEXAS PRODUCERS WERE CONSIDERING THE WRONG YEAR! If the planets made the closest semblance to any description of ‘a new star’ then obviously the year 6 B.C. could not have been that year because the narrators certainly made it known that all of the ancient planets were present in our solar system well before the month in question, the month of April, therefore it had to have been another year for the advent of this ‘new star’ prior to the image of the month and year they presented in their show. Interestingly too, the other two recent SIMULATIONS presented about the day of the advent of the new star showed different varying years as well and all of them contradict the ancient records. One simulation falsely showed the planet Jupiter as being the Star of Bethlehem and passing by the fixed star Regulus three times but failed to make it clear that this OCCURRED OVER A PERIOD OF ABOUT TEN MONTHS and it was in the month of June in the backdrop of the constellation Leo! None of these simulations match written records about the new star appearance and none of them apply the unit A.D. [Anno Dominus] but rather B.C. [Before Christ; or ‘B.C.E.’; Before Common Era] and so, if the Planetary Alignment of A.D. April 16, 2002 [at 6:00 P.M.] was included in on this topic, it should become obvious that the images and simulations shown of 7 B.C., 6 B.C., 2 B.C., and 1 B.C. are wrong. As some modern scientist have admitted, our Calendars are two years off. So the problem with the Texas production would not only be what they have presented but what they have also omitted.
    .
    What the Texas show and others have shown in their images and simulations in regards to the planet movements and arrangements was a constant off and on pattern of certain star conjunctions and configurations after the significant GROUPING and triangular configurations that originally happened when the Star of Bethlehem first came into orbit, and proof of these occurrences can now be seen and fully confirmed due to what just happened recently in A.D. 2002! What they have showed correlates to exactly what happened after the alignment of A.D. 2002 formed. After the Planetary alignment of 2002 formed, the very same off and on patterns of certain triple star configurations, conjunctions, and other various celestial events occurred with various planets and the moon for a few years later! So this new age alignment of A.D. 2002 reveals that the unit of time B.C. that has been applied was done so in gross error. In fact, after the planetary line up in ancient times, it was about 33 years later that there was another full planetary alignment to happen (at the same time of a major Total Solar Eclipse) and then eventually the planets moved out of this pattern completely until about 2000 years later in 2002 and has repeated the same patterns. Scientist today predict that about forty years from the event of 2002, there will be yet another full planet line up and then the planets will probably fall out of that pattern again. Therefore perhaps the image of the Texas show was A.D. 6 instead of 6 B.C. and if the death of Herod can be proven to have happened after a lunar eclipse that followed a Passover, then other dates need to be considered after A.D. 2 and specifically, a lunar eclipse that would have occurred in the autumn season in the month of September or October. Cont.
    ______________________________________________________________________
    .
    *Note; To my surprise, I have just learned that the Romans breached the walls of Masada on April 16 around AD 73/74! After the siege of AD 66, some rebel Jews fled Jerusalem and took refuge at Masada. However, these Jews committed mass suicide on April 15 probably anticipating the actions of the Romans. The two women survivors related the story that was later confirmed through much research and archeological studies. This only connects to the enduring actions of White Supremacist that led to the term ‘Christ killers’, but today this history becomes mute as a result of the Separation of Church and State. Nevertheless, the history still remains and only confirms the birth and life of Jesus Christ! In fact, some of the recent recounts of Masada were posted on April 16, 2013, again confirming that there has been a well kept secret in regards to the actual Birthday of Jesus Christ and the later actions of White Supremacist against the Jews at Masada, other Jews, and the Blacks [original Hebrew Israelites] and etc. Wow!

    [U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff]http://www.realclearhistory.com/2013/04/16/masada_a_fortress_of_jewish_defiance_2078.html[/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U]
    .
    Josephus
    Titus Flavius Josephus
    (37 – c. 100),

    Flavius Josephus fully defected to the Roman side and was granted Roman citizenship. He became an advisor and friend of Vespasian’s son Titus, serving as his translator when Titus led the Siege of Jerusalem, which resulted -- when the Jewish revolt did not surrender -- in the city’s destruction and the looting and destruction of Herod’s Temple (Second Temple).
    .
    Josephus recorded Jewish history, with special emphasis on the 1st century AD and the First Jewish-Roman War, including the Siege of Masada, but the imperial patronage of his work has sometimes caused it to be characterized as pro-Roman propaganda.
    [U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus[/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U]
    .
    All Three planets Mars, Venus, and Saturn will form a colorful equilateral triangle on May 5. In the middle East, the triangle will sit directly over Bethlehem in the West Bank, just as it did on April 1, 2 BC. That fact has led some to suggest that this star formation is the Biblical “Star of Bethlehem,” which led the three Magi to the newborn Jesus.
    [U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff]http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0419/p03s01-ussc.html[/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U]
    .
    BIRTH OF CHRIST RECALCULATED
    The year 3/2 BC was certainly an extraordinary one for visible astronomical exhibitions, as there was no year similar to it for many years on either side (a foretaste had occurred back in 7BC, as Jupiter and Saturn had come into conjunction on 3 occasions: May 26, October 3, and December 1, and this was followed in early 6BC with a close triangulation with Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn….
    [U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff]http://www.versebyverse.org/doctrine/birthofchrist.html[/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U]
    .
    In late April 2002, a rare great conjunction occurred. In this one, Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, Venus, and Mercury were all visible concurrently in the northwestern sky, shortly after sundown. This will happen again in early July 2060, except that on that occasion the quintet will be bunched in the northeastern sky shortly before dawn.

    [U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7f/Lune-Venus-Jupiter.JPG/250px-Lune-Venus-Jupiter.JPG[/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U]
    [U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjunction_(astronomy[/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U]
    )
    .
    Vespasian [Vesp-ASIAN], He was Roman Emperor for 10 years: Reign 1 July 69 - June 79
    …According to Eusebius, Vespasian then ordered all descendants of the royal line of David to be hunted down, causing the Jews to be persecuted from province to province….
    [U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vespasian[/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U]
    .
    [U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f5/Vespasianus03_pushkin.jpg/250px-Vespasianus03_pushkin.jpg[/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U]
    .
    He also began construction of the Colosseum, using funds from the spoils of the Jewish Temple after the Siege of Jerusalem. [34]…
    .
    Vespasian
    (…Latin: Titus Flavius Caesar Vespasianus Augustus;…) [2][3] …subjugating Judaea during the Jewish rebellion of AD 66. [5] ….
    [U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vespasian[/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U]
    .
    *Note; he led attack against the Jews as a military officer and before he became emperor of Rome.
    .
    TITUS, Roman Emperor, but earlier was the one to destroy the Jews. He destroyed the Second Temple of the Jews built during Persian times. It was about a 500 year old temple building.
    Reign 24 June 79 - 13 September 81
    [U][U][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][COLOR=#0000ff]http://0.tqn.com/d/ancienthistory/1/G/n/s/2/titus.jpg[/COLOR][/U][/U][/COLOR][/U][/U]
    Titus
    (Latin: Titus F.lavius Caesar Vespasianus Augustus; [2] …), …
    Prior to becoming Emperor, Titus gained renown as a military commander, serving under his father in Judaea during the First Jewish-Roman War. When Vespasian was declared Emperor on 1 July 69, Titus was left in charge of ending the Jewish rebellion. In 70, he besieged and captured Jerusalem, and destroyed the city and the Second Temple. For this achievement Titus was awarded a triumph; the Arch of Titus commemorates his victory to this day….
    [U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titus[/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U]
    .
    The earliest recorded supernova, SN 185, was viewed by Chinese astronomers in 185 D. The brightest recorded supernova was the SN 1006, which was described in detail by Chinese and Islamic astronomers. [11] The widely observed supernova SN 1054 produced the Crab nebula.
    .
    …In 2009, elevated levels of nitrate ions were found in Antarctic ice, which coincided with the 1066 and 1054 supernovae. Gamma rays from these supernovae could have boosted levels of nitrogen oxides, which became trapped in the ice. [115]
    [U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova[/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U]
    .
    The birth of Jesus is what the gregorian calendar is based on, however they admit they might be out of sync by at least two years, …. 1999 User ID: 8120276 Australia 1/02/2012 08:19 AM
    [U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff][U][U][SIZE=3][COLOR=#0000ff]http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1743052/pg1[/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/U]
    .
    .


    SIMULATION 7 BC, time lapse--



    SIMULATION, from 2 BC to 1 BC



    THE STAR OF BETHLEHEM SHOW

     
  2. rapchild

    rapchild Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    Ghana
    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2006
    Messages:
    446
    Likes Received:
    200
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +209
    Thanks for sharing.
     
Loading...