After reviewing the "thread," seems to ME
there's but ONE VOICE within this "thread,"
that finds this so-called "covenant" w/
black amerika as viewed by tavis smiley
and those symptheizers with him
suspect, or worthy of a much
closer scrutiny. Tell ME Sis (?) Akila,
Have you found the tempered VOICES of
cautious discernment perpetually
distasteful? or are the views of tavis smiley
and those of like-minded-ness w/ him, the final word
in "black authority" or, the "good" of black People?
If this is so...then I agree, there is no need to
engage in your discussion thread at all.....cause WE'D
simply be speaking w/ the intellectually challenged,
or worse, those who sympathize w/ the fundamental
idiom of the original slave-holders tyranny
which is what MY organization, (and THOSE w/ ME,)
fight against. Because I belive this voice is MINE,
(spoken of from the beginning ) I will leave your thread
as it was.....yours.
ROARIN.........
there's but ONE VOICE within this "thread,"
that finds this so-called "covenant" w/
black amerika as viewed by tavis smiley
and those symptheizers with him
suspect, or worthy of a much
closer scrutiny. Tell ME Sis (?) Akila,
Have you found the tempered VOICES of
cautious discernment perpetually
distasteful? or are the views of tavis smiley
and those of like-minded-ness w/ him, the final word
in "black authority" or, the "good" of black People?
If this is so...then I agree, there is no need to
engage in your discussion thread at all.....cause WE'D
simply be speaking w/ the intellectually challenged,
or worse, those who sympathize w/ the fundamental
idiom of the original slave-holders tyranny
which is what MY organization, (and THOSE w/ ME,)
fight against. Because I belive this voice is MINE,
(spoken of from the beginning ) I will leave your thread
as it was.....yours.
ROARIN.........