going above and beyond
- Nov 17, 2006
Clyde, I'd also like to mention that your mentioning a tribe of Nubians Kushites whose lineage goes back 200,000 years requires negating the entire Hebrew calendar which started with our father Adam, the first human, 5779 years ago. You either have to choose modern liars falsehood of hundreds of thousands of years of human race or the biblical view which has just been mention.
In addition,, I don't know what your view is on this issue yet, but as some other fake hebrews say, that the white race (really from the assyrian tribe of asshur (gog) which moved to north western europe after the fall of the assyrian empire, that white people descend from Esau, becaus white peope look like they're red when the get sunburn (I heard read this and many other absurdities in relation to it) that they can't both, hold the claim that King David was ruddy (red or redish or reddish white etc.) which is a good thing (according to them) but Esau's redness was a bad thing..
I've read in hadith (muslim traditions) that Jesus was red in color with curly hair and Moses was brown with straight hair, and fromthe available evidence it is clear that not all of the children of Israel look the same and also that they were neither black nor white but middle eastern and not all of them looked the same as one another due to marriages of the 12 sons of Israel to other tribes (Judah with a cananitess etc.
Not to mention, you never actually responded to most, if not all of the proofs I used in the original article which were staggering evidences of the falsity of the black fake hebrew claim. It is clear that the truth is not the goal here but people just want to believe something no matter how clearly false it is because they want to (it makes them feel good). It's like trying to jam a puzzle peice somewhere it clearly doesn't fit (they make it fit somehow (sarcasm)). I just have a pet peeve for falsehood and especially in important issues like this.,
Everyone knows who the chinese indian, european african are, due to mass transmitted historical fact, and there is no legitimate reason why it should be any different with the hebrews (Ashkenazic, Sephardic and Mizrahic) except that jealous people seem to want to steal their geneology from them due to all the patriarchs, judges, kings and prophets from them. Pardon me for the lenght of my post.
The 200,000 year reference appearing in the article was written by Erika Check Hayden and is her view point, not mine. As a young earth believer holding against macro evolution; only the below highlighted portions of the article were cited and deemed noteworthy by me:
"The first humans left Africa some 200,000 years ago, dispersing to populate the rest of the world. But this was not a one-way trip: some people came back. Scientists say that they have traced a reverse migration that, in two steps, carried genes from the rest of the world back to southern Africa, long before European colonizers arrived ..."
Moreover, the above saves us from all the rabbit holes opened up in your lines of reasoning by providing a more sobering view of the original people being black and from Africa, definitely not Europe.