Explain to me what a strawman tactic really is, pls...or arguments as you say. I wasn't arguing with you. I was stating the case as I see it. What's strawnan about that?
Sometime I feel that when a simple answer is given, the strawman comes in. I've noticed this in other threads.
A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation
of an opponent's position.
To "set up a straw man" or "set up a straw man argument" is to describe
a position that superficially resembles an opponent's actual view but is
easier to refute, then attribute that position to the opponent (for
example, deliberately overstating the opponent's position).
A straw man argument can be a successful rhetorical technique (that is,
it may succeed in persuading people) but it carries little or no real
evidential weight, because the opponent's actual argument has not been refuted.