Okay Brother Edward Williams ... this is all good ... but i think we need to stop and re-evaluate the process. I'm still concerned about the times when the Helper won't agree that the concern presented by the Initiator, is in fact a problem.
We changed #4 to include their agreement, that there is a problem. What if at that point, the Helper says this is not a problem?
Nos. 5 - 9 become unnecessary conversation, as they have not agreed that there is a problem.
It seems that we are going on with the process, assuming that the Helper agrees that there is a problem, even suggesting that they phrase their responses accordingly, and asking them for solutions ... when this may not be the case.
It will be difficult for the Helper to do these things, if they don't agree there is a problem.
I think we need a 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d, etc., explaining what to do if the Helper does not agree that there is a problem.
This works fine, if all agree, but if they don't ...
Whatcha think?
Destee