http://www.destee.com/forums/showthread.php?t=46796"The black is dominate and the white is recessive...meaning black is stronger and more powerful than the weak white gene"
I keep hearing this from people, but I have never seen any real proof of it - I mean if this were true surely the result of any mixed marriage would always be dark black children and this is obviously not the case - I'm proof of that for one...
Besides I've never seen any scientific proof that there is such a thing as black genes and white genes...
I have heard it said that you can tell someone's race by analysing 3 particular sections of DNA.
However I've also heard that white skin was the result of genetic mutation of a single letter of the DNA code and it is believed that it occured in one individual - if this is actually true you might wonder why there are so many whites in the world today - as I remember the theory went that this white skin was seen as a novelty which was attractive to mates - so this single individual wasn't killed as an aberation but mated and their offspring were again seen as attractive - so if this is all correct some black folk have been attracted to white skin for a very long time...
Also it would suggest that this mutant skin gene is anything but weak if it has persisted for so long.
Another piece of evidence is in the Seychelles islands - I remember reading a National Geographic article that was talking about how every now and again dark folk there have a white baby due to genes from white pirates who landed there way, way back - that would suggest too that this mutant gene lasts for a long time even if it is recessive.
As far as the topic at hand. Not interested in reproducing with a white man. So, they have nothing up on black men for me at all.