Black People : Single black women being urged to date outside race

Foe The Masochists That Just Dont Get It!

Those are not the figures I got from Wiki for 2006. They seem exceptionally high.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interr...United_States#Interracial_marriage_by_pairing


Census Bureau statistics

The number of interracial marriages registered by the United States Census Bureau has continued to steadily increase since the Supreme Court 's 1967 ruling in Loving v. Virginia , but also continues representing an absolute minority among the total number of marriages being recorded. According to the 1993 Census, 310,000 interracial marriages were registered by 1970, 651,000 by 1980 and 1,161,000 by 1992, accounting for 0.7%, 1.3% and 2.2% of the total marriage numbers during those years, respectively. With the introduction of the "mixed-race" category, the 2000 census showed interracial marriage to be somewhat further widespread, accounting for 2,669,558 such marriages, or 4.9% of the total.[10] These statistics do not take into account the mixing of ancestries within the same "race"; e.g. a marriage involving Indian and Japanese ancestries would not be classified as interracial due to the Census regarding both as the same category. Likewise, since Hispanic is not a race but an ethnicity , Hispanic marriages with non-Hispanics are not registered as interracial if both partners are of the same race (i.e. a Black Hispanic marrying a non-Hispanic Black partner).[10]


Married couples in the United States in 2006




White husband/White Wife: 50,224,000
White husband/Black Wife: 117,000
White husband/Asian Wife 530,000
White husband/Other Wife 489,000

Black husband/White Wife: 286,000
Black husband/Black Wife: 3,965,000
Black husband/Asian Wife: 34,000
Black husband/Other Wife 45,000

Other husband/White Wife: 535,000
Other husband/Black Wife: 23,000
Other husband/Asian Wife: 41,000
Other husband/Other Wife: 558,000

White Americans were statistically the least likely to wed interracially, though in absolute terms they were involved in interracial marriages more than any other racial group due to their demographic majority. 1.9% of married White women and 2.2% of married White men had a non-White spouse. 1.0% of all married White men were married to an Asian American woman, and 1.0% of married White women were married to a man classified as "other".
3.7% of married Black American women and 8.4% of married Black American men had a non-Black spouse. 6.6% of married Black men and 2.8% of married Black women had a White spouse. 0.1% of married Black women were married to Asian American men, representing the least prevalent marital combination.
There is a notable disparity in the rates of exogamy by Asian American males and females. Of all Asian American/White marriages, only 25% involved an Asian American male and a White female, and of all Asian American/Black marriages only 15% involved an Asian American male and a Black female. 19.5% of married Asian American women and 7.2% of married Asian American men had a non-Asian American spouse.
88% of foreign-born White Hispanic males were married to White Hispanic females. In terms of out-marriage, Hispanic males who identified as White had non-Hispanic wives more often than other Hispanic men. U.S-born White women of non-Hispanic heritage were more likely to marry Hispanics who identified as some other race (19%) than White Hispanic women (2%).

Those are not the figures I got from Wiki for 2006. They seem exceptionally high.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interr...United_States#Interracial_marriage_by_pairing


Census Bureau statistics

The number of interracial marriages registered by the United States Census Bureau has continued to steadily increase since the Supreme Court 's 1967 ruling in Loving v. Virginia , but also continues representing an absolute minority among the total number of marriages being recorded. According to the 1993 Census, 310,000 interracial marriages were registered by 1970, 651,000 by 1980 and 1,161,000 by 1992, accounting for 0.7%, 1.3% and 2.2% of the total marriage numbers during those years, respectively. With the introduction of the "mixed-race" category, the 2000 census showed interracial marriage to be somewhat further widespread, accounting for 2,669,558 such marriages, or 4.9% of the total.[10] These statistics do not take into account the mixing of ancestries within the same "race"; e.g. a marriage involving Indian and Japanese ancestries would not be classified as interracial due to the Census regarding both as the same category. Likewise, since Hispanic is not a race but an ethnicity , Hispanic marriages with non-Hispanics are not registered as interracial if both partners are of the same race (i.e. a Black Hispanic marrying a non-Hispanic Black partner).[10]


Married couples in the United States in 2006




White husband/White Wife: 50,224,000
White husband/Black Wife: 117,000
White husband/Asian Wife 530,000
White husband/Other Wife 489,000

Black husband/White Wife: 286,000
Black husband/Black Wife: 3,965,000
Black husband/Asian Wife: 34,000
Black husband/Other Wife 45,000

Other husband/White Wife: 535,000
Other husband/Black Wife: 23,000
Other husband/Asian Wife: 41,000
Other husband/Other Wife: 558,000

White Americans were statistically the least likely to wed interracially, though in absolute terms they were involved in interracial marriages more than any other racial group due to their demographic majority. 1.9% of married White women and 2.2% of married White men had a non-White spouse. 1.0% of all married White men were married to an Asian American woman, and 1.0% of married White women were married to a man classified as "other".
3.7% of married Black American women and 8.4% of married Black American men had a non-Black spouse. 6.6% of married Black men and 2.8% of married Black women had a White spouse. 0.1% of married Black women were married to Asian American men, representing the least prevalent marital combination.
There is a notable disparity in the rates of exogamy by Asian American males and females. Of all Asian American/White marriages, only 25% involved an Asian American male and a White female, and of all Asian American/Black marriages only 15% involved an Asian American male and a Black female. 19.5% of married Asian American women and 7.2% of married Asian American men had a non-Asian American spouse.
88% of foreign-born White Hispanic males were married to White Hispanic females. In terms of out-marriage, Hispanic males who identified as White had non-Hispanic wives more often than other Hispanic men. U.S-born White women of non-Hispanic heritage were more likely to marry Hispanics who identified as some other race (19%) than White Hispanic women (2%).

Those are not the figures I got from Wiki for 2006. They seem exceptionally high.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interr..._States#Interracial_marriage_by_pairingCensus Bureau statisticsThe number of interracial marriages registered by the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_StatesUnited Stateshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Census_Bureau Census Bureau has continued to steadily increase since the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_StatesSupreme Court's 1967 ruling in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._VirginiaLoving v. Virginia, but also continues representing an absolute minority among the total number of marriages being recorded. According to the 1993 Census, 310,000 interracial marriages were registered by 1970, 651,000 by 1980 and 1,161,000 by 1992, accounting for 0.7%, 1.3% and 2.2% of the total marriage numbers during those years, respectively. With the introduction of the "mixed-race" category, the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Census,_20002000 census showed interracial marriage to be somewhat further widespread, accounting for 2,669,558 such marriages, or 4.9% of the total.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/#cite_note-census-9 These statistics do not take into account the mixing of ancestries within the same "race"; e.g. a marriage involving http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_AmericanIndian and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_AmericanJapanese ancestries would not be classified as interracial due to the Census regarding both as the same category. Likewise, since http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HispanicHispanic is not a race but an http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnicityethnicity, Hispanic marriages with non-Hispanics are not registered as interracial if both partners are of the same race (i.e. a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_HispanicBlack Hispanic marrying a non-Hispanic Black partner).http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/#cite_note-census-9Married couples in the United States in 2006http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/#cite_note-census5-10 White husband/White Wife: 50,224,000White husband/Black Wife: 117,000White husband/Asian Wife 530,000White husband/Other Wife 489,000Black husband/White Wife: 286,000Black husband/Black Wife: 3,965,000Black husband/Asian Wife: 34,000Black husband/Other Wife 45,000Other husband/White Wife: 535,000Other husband/Black Wife: 23,000Other husband/Asian Wife: 41,000Other husband/Other Wife: 558,000http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_AmericanWhite Americans were statistically the least likely to wed interracially, though in absolute terms they were involved in interracial marriages more than any other racial group due to their demographic majority. 1.9% of married White women and 2.2% of married White men had a non-White spouse. 1.0% of all married White men were married to an http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asian_AmericanAsian American woman, and 1.0% of married White women were married to a man classified as "other". 3.7% of married http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_AmericanBlack American women and 8.4% of married Black American men had a non-Black spouse. 6.6% of married Black men and 2.8% of married Black women had a White spouse. 0.1% of married Black women were married to Asian American men, representing the least prevalent marital combination. There is a notable disparity in the rates of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exogamyexogamy by Asian American males and females. Of all Asian American/White marriages, only 25% involved an Asian American male and a White female, and of all Asian American/Black marriages only 15% involved an Asian American male and a Black female. 19.5% of married Asian American women and 7.2% of married Asian American men had a non-Asian American spouse. 88% of foreign-born White Hispanic males were married to White Hispanic females. In terms of out-marriage, Hispanic males who identified as White had non-Hispanic wives more often than other Hispanic men. U.S-born White women of non-Hispanic heritage were more likely to marry Hispanics who identified as some other race (19%) than http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_HispanicWhite Hispanic women (2%).







:em0200:

 
Whites are marrying whites more than they are marrying and procreating with anyone else, so this whole theory is nonsense. Interracial marriages/procreation has nothing to do with the low birth rate of whites, in my view.


What are you talking about? Sometimes it helps not to take things out of context. That comment you quoted was in response to the following statement/question posted by Kemakil:


http://destee.com/forums/showpost.php?p=639186&postcount=9


(to which I responded):


http://destee.com/forums/showpost.php?p=639191&postcount=10
 
That's the whole plan (and it isn't new)...to bring them here so that we get lost in the nonblack agenda to control and destroy us. So, if you understand that, what do you propose should be done to prevent it?

Chuck:

First of all?

Please do forgive my awfully late feedback...

Second of all?

Some things are not and would not be acceptable by the white majority, and/or whichever ones are complicit as regards what is actually the agenda of the rich are a part of continuing contain and control schemes etc.

Third of all?

It all did and does revolve around the hypocrisy and deceit ad naseum of the aformentioned, i. e., how it is via how they maintain their desired socio/economic/political status, by the way of keeping the largest so called minority group on the bottom, which once allowed manufactured status to whites merely on the basis of their so called connections to a particular ethnic/racial/etc. group or groups, some rising above and beyond the rest of us not by the way of their loyality--not their merits--etc.

At least that was the idealized viewpoint of some members of the white status quo:

The reality has to do with needing and wanting the best qualified of any ethnic/racial/etc. group to help them make money etc.

I. e., such is what the transnational corporations represent, and/or it was as well as is the main intent/purpose/etc. of today's immigration quotas to lure the best and brightest to this nation...

You ask how do we stem the tide of legal immigration:

We can't...

We can seek out those among those other people who have no more love for the hypocrisy and deceit of white folk, who also meddle in their nation's business, i. e., who back coups and corrupt monarchs, also from such nations some of those aformentioned immigrants fled, from social and political persecution, as well, hopefully new found allies etc.

Our struggles must eventually link us to other people/other lands/etc. and in promotion of a global community, i. e., sick and tired of the old white bosses ad naseum b. s., us here helping to usher in a better civilization etc., for all of the world's people of color etc.

:geek:
 

Latest profile posts

Destee wrote on Ms Drea's profile.
Peace and Blessings My Sister! :love:
Happy Thanksgiving and Happy Holidays to all members of Destee.
Back
Top