Black Relationships : Signs of a woman with a prostitute mentality

@Perfection

This is where logic goes out the window with some people, especially enough BW that love to argue against a man hitting a woman. Instead of focusing on what is really important,. Which is, any individual, regardless of gender or race, should avoid putting themselves in the position of potentially being harmed by another human being.

Too many women want to focus only on the moral and ethical part of the issue, that they believe in. And totally ignore the practical side of the issue, regarding doing everything to preserve their personal safety.

Thats why I love the teachings in the martial arts discipline. One of the 1st principles of self defense, is to avoid and diffuse a negative situation. You defend yourself by not having to defend yourself.
 
You pose a great question. And it's a fair question.

I think it really comes down to how an individual sees the Black Woman. Her history and all that she's been through.

Don't get it twisted, I personally think some ABW (African/Black Women) deserve to get slapped. Facts. I'll be telling you an untruth if I said otherwise.

But I offer a caveat with that: It depends on the facts and circumstances. Rarely would I agree that a man should hit his woman (provoked or not). If a woman slaps her man, let her get that ish off her chest but be sure you give her that "you get only one freebie" look.

In my opinion, real black men understand the nature of women and so, like you even said (and I agree) if a woman starts tripping too much...move on because-as you correctly pointed out--there's plenty of honies to choose from whereby a man doesn't have to tolerate what he chooses not to tolerate.

And, of course, that goes both ways.
The problem here is this.......women dont dictate the rules of engagement between men and women, or her and her man. The rules of engagement depends heavily on what happens in the minds of each individual.

A woman can totally miscalculate a mans side of the issue. That man may not believe in what she believes in. She slaps him 1st, and he retaliates. What is she gonna say then? Oh you werent supposed to hit me, because it says here, Im supposed to hit you, but you arent supposed to hit me back.

It's unrealistic for women, especially narcissistic BW to go around thinking that everyone she encounters is supposed to abide by her biased twisted rules when she decides to get out of control. A woman or man, is going get the response that their adversary comes with. Not what they think they are entitled to.

To mitigate all of that, it's better to try to avoid drama as much as possible. Thats what women should be focusing on. The fact that enough women refuse to address that , fail to acknowledge it, and fully embrace it , that, speaks volumes. Many women want to be ruleless, they only want men to change for them.
 
@Perfection

You did not answer the question I asked. Instead you gave a rendition of Kamala Harris word salad.

The question was :

Why is it unfair for a man to slap a woman back, who assaulted him 1st?
But you think it's fair for a woman to slap back, another woman that hit her 1st. Why the double standard?

Dont deflect by acting like you agree with me. Im not backing off.. Or deflect by telling me about how OTHER people sees the Black Woman. Her history and all that she's been through.

Im not asking you about how other people see this issue, Im asking you point blank, why you believe it's unfair for a man to slap a woman back, who assaulted him 1st? But you think it's fair for a woman to slap a woman back, who slapped her 1st.

Forget the word salad, and fluff.......just answer the question.
 
You did not answer the question I asked. Instead you gave a rendition of Kamala Harris word salad.

The question was :

Why is it unfair for a man to slap a woman back, who assaulted him 1st?
But you think it's fair for a woman to slap back, another woman that hit her 1st. Why the double standard?
You're not paying attention.

Go back and review. I clearly stated my poisition. It depends on the facts and circumstances. But I also wrote I don't think it's cool for a guy to have slapping his woman as an option at the top of his list.

Kinda weird that you write you like the first principles of martial arts but you are so eager to strike the Black Queen.

Have you ever considered that could be misunderstood as weakness?
 
You're not paying attention.

Go back and review. I clearly stated my poisition. It depends on the facts and circumstances. But I also wrote I don't think it's cool for a guy to have slapping his woman as an option at the top of his list.

Kinda weird that you write you like the first principles of martial arts but you are so eager to strike the Black Queen.

Have you ever considered that could be misunderstood as weakness?
No, you did not answer the question. You answered a question I did not ask. The question was why is it unfair for a man to hit a woman, that hits him1st, but it is not unfair for a woman to hit another woman that hits her 1st? Give me the explanation without putting them in a relationship setting.

The question you chose to answer is, what are the caveats or exceptions for a man hitting a woman. That does not answer the question of why is there a double standard of what you think is fair for a woman to hit another woman, but not for a man to hit a woman back. Forget the exceptions or caveats. Just answer the question.

I know you arent the sharpest member on this board, not a good reader nor a good debater, but stop for a moment and think abut the distinct difference in my question, from the deflected question you answered.

Let me give you an example. If I believed that its unfair for a man to hit a woman back that hits him 1st, but I have a different standard for a woman that hits another woman, that hit her 1st.........Im supposed to explain how the double standard works. Not tell somebody about some caveats or exceptions that you agree its ok. That doesnt speak to the double standard. Do you get it now?

You should explain what makes it unfair for a man, and not for a woman?

Let me repeat......when there are no exceptions or caveats, then what makes a man slapping a woman back unfair, if she hit him 1st? And the BTW, I see what you are doing in order to avoid answering a direct question. A man hitting a woman that hits him 1st does not have to be about two people in a relationship. You can answer the question generally.

I want to know generally why it's unfair for a man to slap a woman back, who hits him 1st. When you said it was fair for a woman to hit another woman, that hit her 1st, they werent in a relationship. So you cant make up some BS about their history of BW or they are in a relationship. All of that side tracking, doesnt apply to them.

So take the relationship deflection out of the equation. I want to know generally why do you think it's unfair for a man to slap a woman back, that hit him 1st?

Can you do that, will you do that.........when will you provide that information?
 

Latest profile posts

Destee wrote on Cindy's profile.
YAAAAAAAAAAY @Cindy ... :love:
Destee wrote on frankster's profile.
:wave:
Back
Top