Very good points Queen Phynxofkmt and Bro. OldiesMan.
Is Pastor Manning speaking about traditional religious marriages, I believe so. One of the main reason for bringing up this subject is for us to shift our thinking just alittle and consider what this concept of being "un-wed" really means.
In our society "un-wed" means you did not go through the procedures of a traditional marriage. You didn't get married in a court setting, church setting or any setting for that matter with a licensed person with the power to marry two people. And this is what we've been calling "marriage."
As if such marriages somehow stop what they are calling an "epidemic" of Black Men not raising their children from happening. I just watched a show not to long ago, that Nanny show where White folks call a Nanny in to teach them how to discipline their own children. You can be married and living at home and not raise your children. The Father was going to work and coming home everyday and refused to spend time with his children, instead he wanted them to play video games all day, and so did the Mother because she wanted to have time to herself. His argument was that he was the only one working and needed his rest to go to work everyday and pay all the bills.
There are many Fathers living in the home who hate their children too. But the real question is, if the Man pays for everything is he required to provide his time for the child as well. No. Even the Gov't says No. So that has nothing to do with marriage, it boils down to money.
So we mean to say if Men were paying ALL the expenses they could have all the babies they wanted to?? Precisely.
Let's think about Kim Porter's close to $35,000 monthly child support check. Would that amount cover the basis for raising one healthy child under America's standards? It should.
So marriage has never been the issue, in fact I would say for those like Pastor Manning this issue will be used to sell religious values as somewhat of a "quick fix" for long generational issues. There is no quick fix for this. There is no" let's get married" and everything will be OK. Life will just figure itself out after you throw that bouquet. No. But in a the real world a Man and Woman are married anyway from two situations.
1) Cohabitation.
2) Having a child.
So the real solution to this problem will arrive when we figure out systems that generate MONEY for OUR children through our child producing Mothers and Fathers. We also have to stop treating the creating of babies as a crime. This is a cursed thought form that is directed at us by those want us to stop producing to being with.
Yet, it's still not just about money, but that's all we have left since our communities is broken. And if the community is broken so is the family, and if the family is broken that means the Man is broke.
Is Pastor Manning speaking about traditional religious marriages, I believe so. One of the main reason for bringing up this subject is for us to shift our thinking just alittle and consider what this concept of being "un-wed" really means.
In our society "un-wed" means you did not go through the procedures of a traditional marriage. You didn't get married in a court setting, church setting or any setting for that matter with a licensed person with the power to marry two people. And this is what we've been calling "marriage."
As if such marriages somehow stop what they are calling an "epidemic" of Black Men not raising their children from happening. I just watched a show not to long ago, that Nanny show where White folks call a Nanny in to teach them how to discipline their own children. You can be married and living at home and not raise your children. The Father was going to work and coming home everyday and refused to spend time with his children, instead he wanted them to play video games all day, and so did the Mother because she wanted to have time to herself. His argument was that he was the only one working and needed his rest to go to work everyday and pay all the bills.
There are many Fathers living in the home who hate their children too. But the real question is, if the Man pays for everything is he required to provide his time for the child as well. No. Even the Gov't says No. So that has nothing to do with marriage, it boils down to money.
So we mean to say if Men were paying ALL the expenses they could have all the babies they wanted to?? Precisely.
Let's think about Kim Porter's close to $35,000 monthly child support check. Would that amount cover the basis for raising one healthy child under America's standards? It should.
So marriage has never been the issue, in fact I would say for those like Pastor Manning this issue will be used to sell religious values as somewhat of a "quick fix" for long generational issues. There is no quick fix for this. There is no" let's get married" and everything will be OK. Life will just figure itself out after you throw that bouquet. No. But in a the real world a Man and Woman are married anyway from two situations.
1) Cohabitation.
2) Having a child.
So the real solution to this problem will arrive when we figure out systems that generate MONEY for OUR children through our child producing Mothers and Fathers. We also have to stop treating the creating of babies as a crime. This is a cursed thought form that is directed at us by those want us to stop producing to being with.
Yet, it's still not just about money, but that's all we have left since our communities is broken. And if the community is broken so is the family, and if the family is broken that means the Man is broke.