Brother AACOOLDRE : Shakespeare's Dark Lady

Discussion in 'AACOOLDRE' started by AACOOLDRE, Sep 22, 2014.

  1. AACOOLDRE

    AACOOLDRE Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2001
    Messages:
    2,447
    Likes Received:
    364
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Teacher
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +400
    SHAKESPEARE’S DARK LADY (SDL) :Amelia Bassano-Lanier
    The mixed-Jewish woman behind Shakespeare’s Plays
    By John Hudson Book Review by Andre Austin

    History’s greatest exemplar of English literature was not the Catholic Shakespeare but a mixed Jewish woman. The late Maya Angelo thought Shakespeare was a black woman. Well she was close.First note that Vespasian almost suffered death from an injury in his foot and Titus suffered permanent injury in his arm help fuel their hatred for the Jews. Shakespeare’s plays were covertly written to literary fight against three Catholic mafia Caesars=Vespasian, Titus and Domitian. A trio of anti-Semitic rulers who commissioned the Gospels to be written to glorify themselves and dehumanize the Jews. Jews didn’t want to submit to the gods, taxation, physical retaliation, dietary laws to Rome so Rome fictionalize the militant Jews into pacifistic, tax paying turn the other Cheek Jews/Christians in the Gospel.

    To understand John Hudson we must first seek out the shout of Acknowledgements: “Special thanks to…Joseph Atwill for suggesting the topic a decade ago” (SDL p.281). This is a crucial fact because in reality Atwill’s and Hudson’s book go hand and hand. Atwill in his book Shakespeare’s Secret Messiah deals with the Cause & Effect of who, what when How and why a Jewish woman ghost wrote Shakespeare plays. Whereas Hudson gloss and floss over this and makes a pyramid mountain of circumstantial evidence, facts and antidotes of information a woman was Shakespeare’s secret pen. Two pages deal with the Cause & effect from which I will cite in this review.

    “To digress, some confusion has arisen over who actually made the discovery that Emilia Bassano was the author of the Shakespearian plays and that they are Typological (One character based on another) reversals of the Flavian’s (3 Roman Caesar’s) comic perspective in the New Testament. To clarify, I would note that after I had made these discoveries I showed them to a colleague, John Hudson, who then went on to produce plays based upon this framework. Hudson has subsequently published a book on this topic, and we discussed these matters in an interview taped by Rodeph Emet on 6/20/2008 (On Youtube). John has assured me that he will assert that these are the facts; that I discovered both that Emilia was the author and that the plays were reversals of the flavians Typology” (Shakespeare’s Secret Messiah By Joe Atwill p.143 also see Atwill’s other book Caesar’s Messiah: The Roman Conspiracy to invent Jesus)

    These facts should be known because no one can properly grow or be enlightened by being ignorant of its own foundation which directly relates to the Cause & Effect.
    Hudson asserts in his book:

    “Amelia’s relationship with Lord Hunsdon would have given her access to the Office of the Revels, which was the only place in England where plays were taken seriously, and where reading plays took place as a real discipline. Readers constantly had to be aware whether a play was heretical or insulting to any of the great nobles, which made for a kind of literary criticism. However, reading plays, as it is reasonable to assume Amelia did, would not have been enough. To become a great playwright she would have needed a mentor. For that, there was really only one man in England equal to the task”. That man was Christopher Marlowe who knew the secret of Christianity of three Roman Caesar’s who had the Gospels written to honor them using not their names.

    Christopher Marlowe: Collaborator & Lover (1589-1592) p.155
    “The early Shakespearean plays are remarkable for having been very substantially influenced by Marlowe; indeed, Marlowe may even have collaborated on some of them. Like Shakespeare, it is highly significant that Marlowe, too, embedded in his plays a system of allegories, albeit fairly crude ones. These allegories reflect, as do those in the Shakespearean plays, the knowledge that Christ was not a historical figure but merely a (Composite) literary character. The gospels were works of literature, not of history, and Christianity itself was therefore was a false religion (see Appendix 8). This was why Marlowe described the literary character Jesus as a ‘deceiver’ in vain and idle tales-literary fictions, not true histories-which as he told Simon Aldrich. Were ‘all one man’s making’. That is they were devised by the Emperor Vespasian (The Wasp & Mule driver) as a matter of policy after the Roman-Jewish war (66Ad-73AD), as the character of Barabas indicates in The Jew of Malta (2.3.9-10). Barabas’s remarks alludes to what is today known as the Flavian hypothesis, as expressed by the Roman Historian Tacitus: “It was only after the rise of the Flavians that we Romans believed in such stories {of Jewish prophecies of a world ruler coming out of Palestine see Numbers 24:17-19 & Daniel 7:13-15) see Histories 1.10 & 5.13, War of Jews 6,5, 312-313 By Josephus Life of Vespasian, 4.5 by Suetonius.

    APPENDIX 8: Marlowe’s Atheism
    Simon Aldrich told Henry Oxinden that “Marlowe was an atheist and had written a book against scripture; how it was all one man’s making, and comprised stories about the deceiver’ Jesus that had been created as a matter of ‘Policy’. Other records claim that Marlowe had ‘better reasons’ for his atheism than any clergyman in the country had for his beliefs and that Christianity was not ‘thought upon’ until after Titus and Vespasian conquered Jerusalem in 70AD as Barabas puts it in The Jew of Malta , (Or see Luke 2:33-35/Matt 24:7-15 Abomination/desolation & Luke 19:43/Luke 21:10-20=Titus military campaign against Jews/Jerusalem compared with War of theJews 5,12,499-501 & WOJ 6 chapter 3.4).

    Marlowe had apparently determined that the New Testament, the Gospels in particular, were written at the instigation of Vespasian and Titus Caesar as Roman satires (parodies & black comedy) against the Jews. In this view, known today in New Testament scholarship as the ‘Flavian hypothesis’, the gospels are not accounts of the ministry of a historical Jewish Jesus compiled by his followers forty years after his death. Rather they are text-war propaganda (Gospel is Greek for “Good news of military Victory),-deliberately created to deceive Messianic Jews into worshiping the Roman Emperors ‘in disguise’. The majority of the key events in the life of Jesus are in fact satirical: each is an elegant literary play on a military battle in which the Jewish armies had been defeated in the Jewish –Roman War.

    Marlowe strongly influenced the writing of Shakespeare/Amelia’s Titus Andronicus on the same model. The Shakespearean plays begin with a crude system of Gospel parallels in Sir Thomas More , reuse the typology from the mystery plays, cover the theology of the Pauline letters and then create a very sophisticated Gospel parodies. Marlowe’s conclusions were rediscovered in modern times and are set out by Dr.Rod blackhirst, a lecturer in Religious studies at La Trobe University, Australia, in his Youtube video ‘The Flavian Thesis: Origin of Christianity; by Cliff Carrington in The Flavian Testament (c. 2002, web document); and most exhaustively by Joseph Atwill in Caesar Messiah.” P.251).
    For example allow me to explain the Typology (A character based on another character) of the Criminal Enterprise of the Catholic Trinity Mafia Inc:
    1. Vespasian (his name means The Wasp and nickname the Mule driver) is based on Osiris who spits in the eyes of the blind and seen as a messianic Tree-god (John 9:6) He plays the role of the Hornet (Wasp) for Joshua/Titus before he goes into Palestine after waiting 40 years or being prophesized to come in 40 years see Josh 24:12, Exodus 23:28)
    2. Titus, son of the Wasp predicted to come as Son of Man within generation of Jesus death 33AD. Titus comes and encircled Jerusalem within a wall and razed the Temple in 70AD exactly 40 years see the citation in appendix 8. Titus Greek name =666 from which all catholic Popes incorporate as Vicarius Filii Dei =666 & substitute of Christ. The first substitute for Christ was Peter and Lazarus both turned into donkeys. The penis of Lazarus was put on the beak of Peter as a rooster/cook. Pliny the elder dedicated a book Natural History and talked about Peter as the cook/Rooster being a good fighter as “Good fighters over government of the world”. The Vatican bronze Penis statue of Peter calls him “savior of the world” from which Jesus wants him to feed the world with Manna/Penis (John 21:17) & if its from the fish bladder for the penis as Vesica Piscis/Viscera Penis.
    3. Domitian (nickname the terrible spirit) he’s best in the book of Revelation as the Caesar who wears a lamb’s wool wig having a entendre or double meaning with Daniel chapter 7. He’s also known for his bedroom torture of pulling women’s hair out. His poet Statius joked about his bald head as a Volcano’s blast in Silvae which may have double meaning in Paul’s Roman’s 12:17-21 talks about leaving “room” for god vengeance of killing rulers with kidness and heap coals over their head. Atwill cites another literal translation of burning coals analogy out of 1 Cor 9:12-20 when speaking of Domitian euaggelion/Gospel good news of victory see (Shakespeare’s Secret Messiah p.351).
      Notes:
      According to archaeologist and historian Acharya S: “Melchizedek is actually the ancient Phoenician god Molech…and corresponds to the Phoenician Moloch (Melech)…human sacrifice especially of children” (Suns of God p.517)
      Paul the anti-Jew or Luke confirms this Jewish sacrifice to Molech in Acts 7:43. Paul makes Jesus a priest of Jesus a priest of Melchizedek in Hebrews chapter 5. The real anti-Roman movement of messianic freedom fighters and keepers of the Dead Sea Scrolls had the messiah come from priesthood of Aaron but he sinned by making an image of a gold calf. So the jews (Roman policy) wanted the Jews sin to be eating human flesh (Lev 26:29, dueteronomy 28 than to sin with an animal.Well that which norish you will destroy you. Everything is Everything and all food is legal including testicals in the shape of manna wafers in all is no more than a cruel joke. The sacrament of Communion is Rome’s cruel joke on Christians. The contemptuous humor that the Romans created regarding the cannibalism of the messianic Jews, evidently springs from the irony they saw in a people with such strict dietary laws eating rancid human flesh and turds during Titus forced famine; the prophecy in Ezekiel chapter 4 & Duteronomy chapter 28 and Lev chapter 26 all said it would happen.
     
  2. AACOOLDRE

    AACOOLDRE Well-Known Member MEMBER

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2001
    Messages:
    2,447
    Likes Received:
    364
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Teacher
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +400
    After Christopher Marlowe’s death in May of 1593, ended his efforts to expose the truth about the origins of Christianity. The book he wrote about the religions origins is gone from history. In his book, the case will be made that another author stepped forward who shared Marlowe’s understanding of the hidden meaning of the Gospels. She owed much to Marlowe for both style and content of her writings. She wrote her plays in the blank verse style of prose that Marlowe had developed, and carried on the satire of the Gospels that he had begun with The Jew of Malta.
    Her name was Emilia Bassano, and she wrote under the name of Shakespeare and you can see various spellings of her name in many of her plays-Joe Atwill
     
Loading...