Mitt Romney v. President Obama: Showdown in November of 2012 will occur. This is the perfect case of either maintain our leap forward or going back in the time of 1860. Romney represents the nostalgic past of dehumanizing blacks through his religion of Mormonism. While Obama’s former minister Wright represented a liberation in theology. Mormonism didn’t totally eradicate itself from the Babylonian Talmud that cursed ham and Canaan with the badge of black skin and with big eyes, lips, emasculated and yes big penis. The Mormon bible still carries the water of this mythology. I came in contact with a Mormon student who gave me a copy of their bible and I found some ridiculous verses pertaining to black people. In reference to black people they state: The curse on black people was a “skin of blackness” - 2 Nephi 5:21 & Alma 3:6 “They had dwindled in unbelief they became a dark, and loathsome, and filthy people full of idleness and abominations”-1 Nephi 12:23. I then went into their index and read under hate. Hatred would be inflicted by all the nations against Jews because they despised the Holy one. Ham eyes weren’t homosexual. In the Egyptian mythology ham was black because the Nile river deposited black mud/soil when the water inundated the land for seeds to be planted. Which wasn’t too far off from the creation of Adam (Genesis 2:6-7). Cham/Ham eyes were compared to the blackest of soil and warmest and moist portions of the heart, they call by the Chem or Cham/Ham. However, through incorrect religious theology the metaphors were reversed from fruitful positive associations to gay and barren associations. A proper dialogue of theological differences makes selecting a president very easy for me. I want to keep leaping forward and never go back to the upside down civilization of the past just prior to the civil war in 1861.