- May 31, 2004
- 3,809
- 102
Thank you for answering the question. As scholars and people of study we should first be willing to display the difference between good and evil towards The Universe.MenNefer said:My person is willing to capitulate.
My person will assume your inductive premise (Focus predominately on the Chasm) and follow the logic with your person.
My person would logically follow the Supreme Being. I would not even question why the son of the supreme being is offering an opposing view(as long as I am in alignment with the Supreme Being) but I would be extreemly leary of the sons intentions.
I would be extreemly leary of the sons intentions.
Well, remember that duality thingy you were talking about?
Due to the reality that the Supreme Being can have no equal we must be exposed to a non-equal and lesser duality. This becomes the intent of demigods and goddesses.
Isa:14:14: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.
We see the exact same intent in the Dogon Song between Amma and the Ogo. We also see it in the KJV Bible between YHVH ALHYM and Jesus. We see this in several Egyptian Bibles such as mans struggle against Ra because he was old and dribbled spittle from his mouth (from the point of view of Ra worshipers), then we see it between Ra and Apep.
We would all naturally lean on the Supreme Being but the Supreme Being had to create resistance to that and make it a challenge, thus the manifestation of Sons of GOD etc….etc.
Peace and Love.