No thanks, I'm already familiar with Rohl's works.......He tries to paint the Kemau in the same light as every other "white Egyptologist", especially the likes of BUDGE and CHAMPAGNE: that of a pagan people given to superstition.
How then is Rohl any different? The last person I'm going to listen to with regards to the history of my people, is a White Cracker Jew on the subject.
In the meantime, what besides Rohl do you have to refute the findings of BLACK historians and archeologists (like the ones I listed in that link) on this subject?