Black People : PETA gave Vick a gang of **** meanwhile PETA Secretly Slaughters Kittens & Puppies!

shaka64

Moderator
MODERATOR
Feb 15, 2007
1,218
865
africa
Occupation
Photographer
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is an organization that publicly claims to represent the best interest of animals -- indeed their "ethical treatment." Yet approximately 2,000 animals pass through PETA's front door every year and very few make it out alive. The vast majority -- 96 percent in 2011 -- exit the facility out the back door after they have been killed, when Pet Cremation Services of Tidewater stops by on their regular visits to pick up their remains. Between these visits, the bodies are stored in the giant walk-in freezer PETA installed for this very purpose. It is a freezer that cost $9,370 and, like the company which incinerates the bodies of PETA's victims, was paid for with the donations of animal lovers who could never have imagined that the money they donated to help animals would be used to end their lives instead. In fact, in the last 11 years, PETA has killed 29,426 dogs, cats, rabbits, and other domestic animals.

Most animal lovers find this hard to believe. But seeing is believing. And if it is true that a picture speaks a thousand words, the following images speak volumes about who and what PETA really stands for.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nathan...b_2979220.html
 
This has been stated and shown quite a few times, but people seem to keep forgetting.

PETA has seemingly nothing to offer but hypocrisy. How can they be so much against cruelty to animals and killing animals for fur and food, when they kill them just to get rid of them? At least doing so for fur and food, you're putting an animal to use after it's dead. Just piling on animal bodies one after the other because you make a claim to having room for the animal but can't come through on it, is worse, from how I see it.

I think they like calling out big names just to get themselves publicity, for I believe they had once called out the president for swatting a fly. This was confusing because some didn't know they made a claim to fighting for insects(?), but I can't say they do, but rather saw an opportunity to criticizing Obama.

They are only being greedy and attention grubbing; they want support but refuse to practice what they preach to others. They love animals far more than the fellow man, and teach people to be cruel and condescending to one another as if showing to compassion to humans and animals alike isn't possible to manage.

I really wish many people would back down from this organization; it doesn't profit people nor animal.
 
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is an organization that publicly claims to represent the best interest of animals -- indeed their "ethical treatment." Yet approximately 2,000 animals pass through PETA's front door every year and very few make it out alive. The vast majority -- 96 percent in 2011 -- exit the facility out the back door after they have been killed, when Pet Cremation Services of Tidewater stops by on their regular visits to pick up their remains. Between these visits, the bodies are stored in the giant walk-in freezer PETA installed for this very purpose. It is a freezer that cost $9,370 and, like the company which incinerates the bodies of PETA's victims, was paid for with the donations of animal lovers who could never have imagined that the money they donated to help animals would be used to end their lives instead. In fact, in the last 11 years, PETA has killed 29,426 dogs, cats, rabbits, and other domestic animals.

Most animal lovers find this hard to believe. But seeing is believing. And if it is true that a picture speaks a thousand words, the following images speak volumes about who and what PETA really stands for.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nathan...b_2979220.html



In the Spirit of Sankofa,




... Welcome back brother shaka64 and thanks for posting this. After doing a little research with the same source, here's what I found to my dismay, which enables PETA to get away with the wrongdoings.

They are registered as a Shelter. They are a nonprofit, tax-exempt 501(c)(3) corporation. It would take local and federal action involving the state of Virginia to overturn and reject their licenses, registration and tax exempt status, smh...



PETA: A Cult-ure of Killing

February 5, 2013 by Nathan J. Winograd
Not only does PETA’s registration with the State of Virginia as a shelter give PETA the ability to acquire the controlled substance sodium pentobarbital which they use to poison animals, but being registered as a shelter allows them to mislead people into believing that the killing that they do is consistent with that being done by shelters, a form of killing which, tragically, has long been tolerated even by people who claim to love animals. Were Ingrid Newkirk to independently—without a staff and organization to back her—seek out thousands of animals a year after saying she will try to find them homes, by taking them from rescue groups and shelters, gathering animals through trapping or acquiring those displaced by natural disasters, only to inject them with poison and kill them—most people would opine that she was a deeply disturbed person inflicting death upon animals in obedience to dark impulses. Unfortunately, her association with PETA and its claim that they are a “shelter of last resort” obscures the issue for many people.


http://www.nathanwinograd.com/?p=11830


And this:

Source: Virginia Department of Agriculture
According to inspection reports by the Virginia Department of Agriculture, the PETA facility "does not contain sufficient animal enclosures to routinely house the number of animals annually reported as taken into custody... The shelter is not accessible to the public, promoted, or engaged in efforts to facilitate the adoption of animals taken into custody."
Routine inspections often found "no animals to be housed in the facility" or, at best "few animals in custody," despite thousands of them impounded by PETA annually. Since they take in thousands per year, where were they? "90% [of the animals] were euthanized within the first 24 hours of custody," according to the Virginia Department of Agriculture inspector. How can people adopt animals from PETA when they kill the animals they acquire within minutes without ever making them available for adoption? How can people adopt animals when they have no adoption hours, do no adoption promotion, and do not show animals for adoption, choosing to kill them without doing so? In fact, when asked by a reporter what efforts they make to find animals homes, PETA had no comment.
2013-03-29-petapostcard.jpg

Source: Nathan Winograd
A postcard written and signed by Ingrid Newkirk, PETA's founder, admitting that PETA does not believe animals have a right to live, despite its public perception of PETA as an "animal rights" organization. The right to life is the most fundamental of all rights. It is fundamental because without it, no other "rights" are possible. How can animals be guaranteed the right to food, water, shelter and protection, when those things can be taken away by killing them?

Peace In,
 
In the Spirit of Sankofa,




... Welcome back brother shaka64 and thanks for posting this. After doing a little research with the same source, here's what I found to my dismay, which enables PETA to get away with the wrongdoings.

They are registered as a Shelter. They are a nonprofit, tax-exempt 501(c)(3) corporation. It would take local and federal action involving the state of Virginia to overturn and reject their licenses, registration and tax exempt status, smh...



PETA: A Cult-ure of Killing

February 5, 2013 by Nathan J. Winograd
Not only does PETA’s registration with the State of Virginia as a shelter give PETA the ability to acquire the controlled substance sodium pentobarbital which they use to poison animals, but being registered as a shelter allows them to mislead people into believing that the killing that they do is consistent with that being done by shelters, a form of killing which, tragically, has long been tolerated even by people who claim to love animals. Were Ingrid Newkirk to independently—without a staff and organization to back her—seek out thousands of animals a year after saying she will try to find them homes, by taking them from rescue groups and shelters, gathering animals through trapping or acquiring those displaced by natural disasters, only to inject them with poison and kill them—most people would opine that she was a deeply disturbed person inflicting death upon animals in obedience to dark impulses. Unfortunately, her association with PETA and its claim that they are a “shelter of last resort” obscures the issue for many people.


http://www.nathanwinograd.com/?p=11830


And this:

Source: Virginia Department of Agriculture
According to inspection reports by the Virginia Department of Agriculture, the PETA facility "does not contain sufficient animal enclosures to routinely house the number of animals annually reported as taken into custody... The shelter is not accessible to the public, promoted, or engaged in efforts to facilitate the adoption of animals taken into custody."
Routine inspections often found "no animals to be housed in the facility" or, at best "few animals in custody," despite thousands of them impounded by PETA annually. Since they take in thousands per year, where were they? "90% [of the animals] were euthanized within the first 24 hours of custody," according to the Virginia Department of Agriculture inspector. How can people adopt animals from PETA when they kill the animals they acquire within minutes without ever making them available for adoption? How can people adopt animals when they have no adoption hours, do no adoption promotion, and do not show animals for adoption, choosing to kill them without doing so? In fact, when asked by a reporter what efforts they make to find animals homes, PETA had no comment.
2013-03-29-petapostcard.jpg

Source: Nathan Winograd
A postcard written and signed by Ingrid Newkirk, PETA's founder, admitting that PETA does not believe animals have a right to live, despite its public perception of PETA as an "animal rights" organization. The right to life is the most fundamental of all rights. It is fundamental because without it, no other "rights" are possible. How can animals be guaranteed the right to food, water, shelter and protection, when those things can be taken away by killing them?

Peace In,

You be on it, Clyde. Nice.

Why do they get so angry with people eating animals then if they don't believe they have a right to life??
 

Donate

Support destee.com, the oldest, most respectful, online black community in the world - PayPal or CashApp

Latest profile posts

HODEE wrote on Etophil's profile.
Welcome to Destee
@Etophil
Destee wrote on SleezyBigSlim's profile.
Hi @SleezyBigSlim ... Welcome Welcome Welcome ... :flowers: ... please make yourself at home ... :swings:
Back
Top