you've gone from hastily criticizing my work and labeling it as inaccurate to now saying I need to present it to "relevant journals" for "peer review." with an underlining suggestion that if I don't, then my work about the Perfection of Black Women is null and void. i'm wondering what tools have you to gauge "relevant" and most curious as to who you would deem a "peer." that discussion would then generate several more queries and pertinent subsets.
first, on whose criterion do you bestow those you consider to be embedded in the "relevant journals" who, incidentally, do not subscribe to the Perfection thesis, who would qualify as my "peers"?
if your thoughts are captured by the prisons of antagonism toward the Black Woman, you may find it difficult to "peer" with one who holds her (in all modalities) as a living, breathing personification of eternity.
it's difficult to "peer" with someone when the other does not embrace and share the special knowledge that Black Woman is the black man's everything and that--without her---he is nothing.
having said that, my dear Brotha, my "peers" are those who recognize that Black Woman is the avatar of everything that's beautiful, everything intelligent and everything sophisticated. and I make reference to the primordial beauty which does not mirror the makeshift aesthetics created for the enjoyment of the masses.
dr. john henrik Clarke said it best: "I debate with my equals...all others I teach."
remember this my friend. it's not about "where" you write which makes you great...but "what" you write.
For get the peer review thing, I thought you were making the clam that the Egyptian hieroglyphics had not been deciphered. So I thought this is something the world would want to know.What I meant by peer review is simple you make a claim and others in the same field look at you work and evidence and come to the same conclusion as you. Clearly I was wrong and from this response I see we view the world very differently so there would be no point.
I did not mean for my criticism to be taken as hostile. If all you're say is black women are beautiful and very important to black men that's fine. I agree black women are important to every one they're just not gods; unless you mean it in a poetic or romantic way in which case they are what ever you want them to be. I must have misunderstood you, I thought you said they was a time in black history when ALL black women where seen as gods and that during this period black people did not suffer.
.