- Sep 12, 2009
- 6,840
- 3,594
I disagree for these reasons.
1. There is not one, not one illness or condition that requires the use of embryo,
that cannot be treated by alternative medecine, or stem cells from the patient.
2. The tests products as well as the harvested embryos will come from exlpoited impoverished
nations and more then likely from Africa hence providing a sizeable residual financial return
from ethnic genocide programs
Ankhur,
I appreciate your comments and I will not challenge them.
However, it's beginning to look as though you are creating a
scenario/condition different from the one I've laid out in my first post.
I'm not speaking on who is or will be exploited. The subject of 'exploitation'
is not pertinent. That is for a different thread.
Stand alone fact:
The excess of eggs are generally as a result of the use of fertility drugs, which ultimately,
they get destroyed or they sit in a freezer. The few that have been "adopted"
(200 or so last I recall), are 'adopted' by those who don't want them used in medical
research. <<I wanna make it clear that I am not and will not dispute that reason.
Whether the adopters will actually use them so that they won't be used in a way
that may be deemed 'unfavorable' is yet to be determined. If they do make use of them...
this can only be achieved via ivf... which in any event brings us back to my original premise.
So let me see if I can keep you, and I, on track.
Assuming that cures are discovered as a result of using embryonic stem cells. Assuming now.
Okay...
If you, or anyone else, are against it (and I have no problem if you are),
because it is "ungodly"/anatural then would it be "ungodly"/anatural
to make use of ivf if either party of a hetero-couple is naturally infertile
provided by the belief that 'god' does not make mistakes? That is to say if 'god'/nature
dealt either (or both) the hand of not being able to have children; they were born with the
inability to have children.
I'm interested in y'alls thoughts, based on and within the context laid out in the above remarks.